Using Cross-Cultural Collaboration to Establish a Working Coalition for An Equitable COVID-19 Vaccine Program

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Humanistic Psychology Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1177/00221678221140625
Floyd Thompkins, P. Goldblum, Tammy Lai, Jahmeer Reynolds, Randi B. Lachter, Pooja G. Mhatre, Shirin Vakharia, Sheila M. Thompson, L. M. Brown
{"title":"Using Cross-Cultural Collaboration to Establish a Working Coalition for An Equitable COVID-19 Vaccine Program","authors":"Floyd Thompkins, P. Goldblum, Tammy Lai, Jahmeer Reynolds, Randi B. Lachter, Pooja G. Mhatre, Shirin Vakharia, Sheila M. Thompson, L. M. Brown","doi":"10.1177/00221678221140625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coalitions and collaborations with African Americans in the United States are often between people with equal humanity but unequal power. Endeavors between historically harmed communities and representatives of systems that continue to harm them frequently lead to intentional and unintentional miscommunication, mistrust, and distrust. The causes for health inequity are complex and should include consideration of systemic racism. In most standard public health models, departments typically take the lead and invite select members of the community to help. This article describes a collaboration that took place in Marin City, California, between African American churches, the department of public health, and community-based organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This example focuses on the value of African American history and cosmology as a foundation for respectful cross-cultural collaboration in implementing a COVID-19 vaccination effort. A cross-cultural collaborative model was developed for use by this coalition to guide the development and implementation of community response teams. Unique and shared responsibilities provided by the coalition partners are examined. Humanistic principles, including empathy, positive regard, trust, and grace, are held as central to the model when planning, implementing, and evaluating activities undertaken by cross-cultural coalitions. Sustainability issues are considered concerning staffing, funding, and public policy.","PeriodicalId":47290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678221140625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coalitions and collaborations with African Americans in the United States are often between people with equal humanity but unequal power. Endeavors between historically harmed communities and representatives of systems that continue to harm them frequently lead to intentional and unintentional miscommunication, mistrust, and distrust. The causes for health inequity are complex and should include consideration of systemic racism. In most standard public health models, departments typically take the lead and invite select members of the community to help. This article describes a collaboration that took place in Marin City, California, between African American churches, the department of public health, and community-based organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This example focuses on the value of African American history and cosmology as a foundation for respectful cross-cultural collaboration in implementing a COVID-19 vaccination effort. A cross-cultural collaborative model was developed for use by this coalition to guide the development and implementation of community response teams. Unique and shared responsibilities provided by the coalition partners are examined. Humanistic principles, including empathy, positive regard, trust, and grace, are held as central to the model when planning, implementing, and evaluating activities undertaken by cross-cultural coalitions. Sustainability issues are considered concerning staffing, funding, and public policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用跨文化合作建立公平的COVID-19疫苗计划工作联盟
在美国,与非裔美国人的联盟和合作往往是在具有平等人性但不平等权力的人之间进行的。历史上伤害社区和继续伤害他们的系统代表之间的努力经常导致有意和无意的误解、不信任和不信任。卫生不平等的原因很复杂,应考虑到系统性种族主义。在大多数标准的公共卫生模式中,部门通常会带头,并邀请社区的精选成员提供帮助。本文描述了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,非裔美国人教会、公共卫生部门和社区组织在加利福尼亚州马林市进行的合作。这个例子强调了非裔美国人的历史和宇宙学的价值,这是在实施COVID-19疫苗接种工作中相互尊重的跨文化合作的基础。该联盟开发了一种跨文化合作模式,用于指导社区响应团队的发展和实施。审查了联盟伙伴提供的独特和共同的责任。在规划、实施和评估跨文化联盟开展的活动时,人本主义原则,包括移情、积极关注、信任和优雅,被认为是该模型的核心。可持续性问题涉及人员配置、资金和公共政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Humanistic Psychology is an interdisciplinary forum for contributions, controversies and diverse statements pertaining to humanistic psychology. It addresses personal growth, interpersonal encounters, social problems and philosophical issues. An international journal of human potential, self-actualization, the search for meaning and social change, the Journal of Humanistic Psychology was founded by Abraham Maslow and Anthony Sutich in 1961. It is the official journal of the Association for Humanistic Psychology.
期刊最新文献
From Wonder to Transformation: The Lived Experience of Profound Awe Medical School Civic Engagement During COVID-19: Activating Institutions for Equitable Community Response College Students’ Experiences of Freedom, Isolation, Meaninglessness, and Death: A Qualitative Examination Tom Greening—The Incomparable (Tribute Through Tears) The Mourning of the New Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1