Interpersonal communication competence and the responsivity principle among inmates: implications for institutional misconduct

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1080/10509674.2022.2062517
Laurie Drapela, Amelia W. Cole, Vail Fletcher, Nick McRee
{"title":"Interpersonal communication competence and the responsivity principle among inmates: implications for institutional misconduct","authors":"Laurie Drapela, Amelia W. Cole, Vail Fletcher, Nick McRee","doi":"10.1080/10509674.2022.2062517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Inmate misconduct threatens two critically important functions of prison life: offender rehabilitation and facility safety. While many offender change programs focus on empathy development as a tool for reducing inmate misconduct, few studies elucidate how an inmate’s communication competence plays a role in the empathy-misconduct relationship. Drawing upon the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) framework, we conduct a multi-site investigation of prisons in a US state to assess the association between inmates’ self-assessed levels of interpersonal communication competence (ICC) and the incidence of inmate misconduct, net of controls and demographics. Results reveal higher levels of interpersonal communication competence are related to fewer major behavioral infractions but have no observed relationship with minor infractions while incarcerated. Empathy measures had no effect on either type of infraction. Theory and policy implications of our findings for correctional practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2062517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Inmate misconduct threatens two critically important functions of prison life: offender rehabilitation and facility safety. While many offender change programs focus on empathy development as a tool for reducing inmate misconduct, few studies elucidate how an inmate’s communication competence plays a role in the empathy-misconduct relationship. Drawing upon the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) framework, we conduct a multi-site investigation of prisons in a US state to assess the association between inmates’ self-assessed levels of interpersonal communication competence (ICC) and the incidence of inmate misconduct, net of controls and demographics. Results reveal higher levels of interpersonal communication competence are related to fewer major behavioral infractions but have no observed relationship with minor infractions while incarcerated. Empathy measures had no effect on either type of infraction. Theory and policy implications of our findings for correctional practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
囚犯之间的人际沟通能力和责任原则:对机构不当行为的影响
摘要囚犯的不当行为威胁着监狱生活的两个至关重要的功能:罪犯康复和设施安全。虽然许多罪犯改造项目侧重于移情发展,将其作为减少囚犯不当行为的工具,但很少有研究阐明囚犯的沟通能力如何在移情不当行为关系中发挥作用。根据风险需求响应(RNR)框架,我们对美国一个州的监狱进行了多点调查,以评估囚犯自我评估的人际沟通能力水平(ICC)与囚犯不当行为发生率、控制和人口统计之间的关系。结果显示,较高水平的人际沟通能力与较少的重大行为违规有关,但与监禁期间的轻微违规没有观察到的关系。同理心措施对这两种违规行为都没有影响。讨论了我们的研究结果对矫正实践的理论和政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Offender Rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary journal of innovation in research, services and programs in criminal justice and corrections. The journal is an essential professional resource for practitioners, educators and researchers who work with individuals involved in the criminal justice system and study the dynamics of rehabilitation and individual and system change. Original research using qualitative or quantitative methodology, theoretical discussions, evaluations of program outcomes, and state of the science reviews will be considered.
期刊最新文献
“Nobody is really going to hire a 69-year-old man with a felony record”: challenges finding employment for older, formerly incarcerated individuals Just Care: usability testing of e-learning modules for peer caregivers living in prison The effect of drug treatment court on recidivism: a comparison with traditional court intervention Forgiveness and rehabilitation of Portuguese incarcerated individuals: what do they think about forgiveness? Exploring the impacts of individual residential mobility, housing, and social disorganization on recidivism among parolees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1