{"title":"Colloquy with Steven Van de Walle on trust in Public Administration","authors":"M. Canel","doi":"10.1080/23753234.2020.1820884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This interview with Professor Steven Van de Walle was framed by the fact that it was conducted during the lockdown caused by COVID-19, a crisis that has shown a globally shared vulnerability and that might be challenging the trustworthiness of governments. The talk starts at a conceptual level, looking at what trust in Public Administration is about. There follows an exploration of the sources of trust. Van de Walle deploys a typology to illustrate how information, rational calculus and emotions might shape a person’s judgement about whether to trust. Based on recent research evidence from cross-country comparative data, he elaborates on the issue of what matters the most for citizens when deciding to trust. He deals with several relevant current debates regarding communication research and practice: the gap between real and perceived performance, the relation to post-truth, the impact of transparency, and the challenge of dealing with distrustful citizens. One major topic is how to measure trust: methods, research designs, available data, and current challenges. He also makes some comparative considerations between trust in Public Administration and trust in other organizations such as the Church and NGOs. The final part of the interview is a reflection about how COVID-19 might be affecting citizens’ trust in government.","PeriodicalId":36858,"journal":{"name":"Church, Communication and Culture","volume":"5 1","pages":"484 - 498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23753234.2020.1820884","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1820884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This interview with Professor Steven Van de Walle was framed by the fact that it was conducted during the lockdown caused by COVID-19, a crisis that has shown a globally shared vulnerability and that might be challenging the trustworthiness of governments. The talk starts at a conceptual level, looking at what trust in Public Administration is about. There follows an exploration of the sources of trust. Van de Walle deploys a typology to illustrate how information, rational calculus and emotions might shape a person’s judgement about whether to trust. Based on recent research evidence from cross-country comparative data, he elaborates on the issue of what matters the most for citizens when deciding to trust. He deals with several relevant current debates regarding communication research and practice: the gap between real and perceived performance, the relation to post-truth, the impact of transparency, and the challenge of dealing with distrustful citizens. One major topic is how to measure trust: methods, research designs, available data, and current challenges. He also makes some comparative considerations between trust in Public Administration and trust in other organizations such as the Church and NGOs. The final part of the interview is a reflection about how COVID-19 might be affecting citizens’ trust in government.
对史蒂芬·范德华教授的采访是在COVID-19造成的封锁期间进行的,这场危机显示出全球共同的脆弱性,并可能挑战政府的可信度。讲座从概念层面开始,探讨公共管理中的信任是什么。接下来是对信任来源的探索。Van de Walle运用了一种类型学来说明信息、理性演算和情感如何影响一个人对是否信任的判断。基于最近跨国比较数据的研究证据,他详细阐述了在决定信任时,对公民来说最重要的是什么。他处理了当前关于传播研究和实践的几个相关争论:真实表现和感知表现之间的差距,与后真相的关系,透明度的影响,以及处理不信任公民的挑战。一个主要的话题是如何衡量信任:方法、研究设计、可用数据和当前的挑战。他还对公共行政信任与教会、非政府组织等其他组织的信任进行了比较思考。采访的最后一部分是关于COVID-19如何影响公民对政府的信任的思考。