Threatening or Benevolent Hegemon?

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.3167/GPS.2020.380305
I. Karolewski, Maciej Olejnik
{"title":"Threatening or Benevolent Hegemon?","authors":"I. Karolewski, Maciej Olejnik","doi":"10.3167/GPS.2020.380305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the political science literature, we can find various approaches to Germany’s “alleged” hegemony. In the article we examine the images of Germany among the Polish political parties between 2014 and 2017 to better understand their different attitudes toward Germany in the context of Polish foreign policy. We distinguish four types of images of Germany: benevolent hegemon, malicious hegemon, tamed hegemon, and non-hegemon. The left and center parties (the Nowoczesna, the PO, the SLD) viewed Germany as a benevolent hegemon, strengthening Poland’s position at the international level, and also as a tamed hegemon (restricted by the EU and NATO). The right-wing and nationalist parties (the Kukiz 15, the PiS, the SP) perceived Germany as a malicious hegemon that conducts hostile foreign policy against Poland. Two remaining parties adopted “peculiar” approaches toward Germany: the PSL treated Germany simultaneously as a benevolent and malicious hegemon, whereas TR treated Germany only as a tamed one.","PeriodicalId":44521,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","volume":"38 1","pages":"77-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2020.380305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the political science literature, we can find various approaches to Germany’s “alleged” hegemony. In the article we examine the images of Germany among the Polish political parties between 2014 and 2017 to better understand their different attitudes toward Germany in the context of Polish foreign policy. We distinguish four types of images of Germany: benevolent hegemon, malicious hegemon, tamed hegemon, and non-hegemon. The left and center parties (the Nowoczesna, the PO, the SLD) viewed Germany as a benevolent hegemon, strengthening Poland’s position at the international level, and also as a tamed hegemon (restricted by the EU and NATO). The right-wing and nationalist parties (the Kukiz 15, the PiS, the SP) perceived Germany as a malicious hegemon that conducts hostile foreign policy against Poland. Two remaining parties adopted “peculiar” approaches toward Germany: the PSL treated Germany simultaneously as a benevolent and malicious hegemon, whereas TR treated Germany only as a tamed one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威胁霸权还是仁慈霸权?
在政治学文献中,我们可以找到对德国“所谓”霸权的各种说法。在本文中,我们考察了2014年至2017年间波兰各政党对德国的形象,以更好地理解他们在波兰外交政策背景下对德国的不同态度。我们将德国的形象划分为四种类型:仁慈的霸权、恶意的霸权、驯服的霸权和非霸权。左翼和中间政党(Nowoczesna, PO, SLD)认为德国是一个仁慈的霸主,加强了波兰在国际层面的地位,也是一个驯服的霸主(受到欧盟和北约的限制)。右翼和民族主义政党(Kukiz 15, PiS, SP)认为德国是一个恶意的霸权,对波兰实施敌对的外交政策。剩下的两个政党对德国采取了“特殊”的态度:PSL同时将德国视为一个仁慈和恶意的霸主,而TR只将德国视为一个驯服的霸主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
In Government and Scientists We Trust Does the Immigration Issue Divide German Attitudes toward Social Welfare? Hitler's American Countermodel Questioned Nationalism Obituary: Peter Pulzer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1