The Financial State of Local Communities: A Comparative Research of Ukraine and the Czech Republic

D. Kozlov, Yuriy Derev’yanko, V. Piven, L. Melnyk, O. Kubatko
{"title":"The Financial State of Local Communities: A Comparative Research of Ukraine and the Czech Republic","authors":"D. Kozlov, Yuriy Derev’yanko, V. Piven, L. Melnyk, O. Kubatko","doi":"10.2478/eb-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article describes the specific details of local communities functioning in Ukraine and the Czech Republic. It has been examined that Ukraine and the Czech Republic have similar, but not identical systems of local governance. We conducted a comparative analysis of the financial state of local communities in both countries by five indicators. Indicator 1 (total income per capita) characterises the community’s financial potential and reveals that Ukraine’s local communities have fewer financial resources to use. Indicator 2 (total expenditures per capita) describes the ability to provide residents with the resources generated in their community and Czech communities have a higher value of this indicator. Indicator 3 (share of the administrative expenditures) shows the effectiveness of money spent, and local communities in both Ukraine and the Czech Republic spend particularly the same part of their total expenditures on administrative needs. Indicator 4 (capital expenditures per capita) demonstrate how the money generated is spent on urgent capital investments and Ukraine’s communities have much lower capital expenditures per capita than Czech ones. Indicator 5 (the share of capital expenditures in total expenditures) reflects how local communities perceive the importance of investments in capital projects and Ukraine’s communities spend fewer financial resources for capital needs than Czech ones.","PeriodicalId":31810,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Business","volume":"35 1","pages":"165 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article describes the specific details of local communities functioning in Ukraine and the Czech Republic. It has been examined that Ukraine and the Czech Republic have similar, but not identical systems of local governance. We conducted a comparative analysis of the financial state of local communities in both countries by five indicators. Indicator 1 (total income per capita) characterises the community’s financial potential and reveals that Ukraine’s local communities have fewer financial resources to use. Indicator 2 (total expenditures per capita) describes the ability to provide residents with the resources generated in their community and Czech communities have a higher value of this indicator. Indicator 3 (share of the administrative expenditures) shows the effectiveness of money spent, and local communities in both Ukraine and the Czech Republic spend particularly the same part of their total expenditures on administrative needs. Indicator 4 (capital expenditures per capita) demonstrate how the money generated is spent on urgent capital investments and Ukraine’s communities have much lower capital expenditures per capita than Czech ones. Indicator 5 (the share of capital expenditures in total expenditures) reflects how local communities perceive the importance of investments in capital projects and Ukraine’s communities spend fewer financial resources for capital needs than Czech ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方社区的财政状况:乌克兰与捷克的比较研究
文章描述了乌克兰和捷克共和国当地社区运作的具体细节。经审查,乌克兰和捷克共和国有类似但不完全相同的地方治理制度。我们通过五个指标对两国当地社区的财务状况进行了比较分析。指标1(人均总收入)描述了该社区的财政潜力,并表明乌克兰当地社区可使用的财政资源较少。指标2(人均总支出)描述了向居民提供社区产生的资源的能力,捷克社区的这一指标价值较高。指标3(占行政支出的份额)显示了所花资金的有效性,乌克兰和捷克共和国的地方社区将其总支出的同一部分用于行政需求。指标4(人均资本支出)表明,所产生的资金如何用于紧急资本投资,乌克兰社区的人均资本支出远低于捷克社区。指标5(资本支出占总支出的份额)反映了当地社区如何看待资本项目投资的重要性,而乌克兰社区用于资本需求的财政资源比捷克社区少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Basel IV: Implementation, Challenges and Prospects Basel IV: Implementation, Challenges and Prospects Generation Y and Z Preferences Regarding Influencer Marketing Impact of Digital Banking Services on Consumer Satisfaction Political-Economic Eclecticism in Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1