Indonesia’s Interests in the World Trade Organization and the Appellate Body Impasse: Questioning the Existence of Special and Differential Treatment

Yuridika Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38933
Setyo Utomo
{"title":"Indonesia’s Interests in the World Trade Organization and the Appellate Body Impasse: Questioning the Existence of Special and Differential Treatment","authors":"Setyo Utomo","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Trade Organization’s role in resolving international trade disputes is crucial, particularly in multilateral trade, which continues to grow alongside information disclosure and technology advancements. Dispute settlement systems often depend on the existence of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body. However, in 2019, the United States prevented new members from joining this body, resulting in dysfunction and instability. Moreover, in 2020, the term of the last sitting Appellate Body member expired. As members of the World Trade Organization, Indonesia and other developing nations receive preferential treatment, which frequently backfires when dealing with developed nations. The special and differential treatment provided to developing nations is supposed to minimize the distinctions between developed and developing nations. This study identified possible actions that Indonesia and other developing nations could take to put an end to the World Trade Organization’s impasse. To do this, they could use non-alignment diplomacy and waive their special and differential treatment. Both a conceptual approach and a literature review were used in this study.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Trade Organization’s role in resolving international trade disputes is crucial, particularly in multilateral trade, which continues to grow alongside information disclosure and technology advancements. Dispute settlement systems often depend on the existence of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body. However, in 2019, the United States prevented new members from joining this body, resulting in dysfunction and instability. Moreover, in 2020, the term of the last sitting Appellate Body member expired. As members of the World Trade Organization, Indonesia and other developing nations receive preferential treatment, which frequently backfires when dealing with developed nations. The special and differential treatment provided to developing nations is supposed to minimize the distinctions between developed and developing nations. This study identified possible actions that Indonesia and other developing nations could take to put an end to the World Trade Organization’s impasse. To do this, they could use non-alignment diplomacy and waive their special and differential treatment. Both a conceptual approach and a literature review were used in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚在世界贸易组织中的利益和上诉机构的僵局:质疑特殊和差别待遇的存在
世界贸易组织在解决国际贸易争端方面的作用至关重要,特别是在多边贸易中,随着信息披露和技术进步,多边贸易继续增长。争端解决制度往往取决于世界贸易组织上诉机构的存在。然而,2019年,美国阻止新成员加入该机构,导致功能失调和不稳定。此外,在2020年,最后一位现任上诉机构成员的任期届满。作为世界贸易组织的成员,印度尼西亚和其他发展中国家获得优惠待遇,这在与发达国家打交道时经常适得其反。向发展中国家提供特殊和差别待遇是为了尽量减少发达国家和发展中国家之间的区别。这项研究确定了印度尼西亚和其他发展中国家可能采取的行动,以结束世界贸易组织的僵局。要做到这一点,他们可以使用不结盟外交,放弃特殊和差别待遇。本研究采用了概念方法和文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Responsibilities of Medical Practice through Digital Health Platforms Estimating The Exploration And Production (E&P) Industry's Rig Contract Business Owner The WTO Dispute Settlement System and How It Incentivizes Imparity Between Indonesia’s Executive and Parliament Legal Protection for Child Victims of Bullying from the Perspective of Child Protection Law Enhancing Human Rights Protections in Ukrainian Law Enforcement: National Compliance with EU Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1