{"title":"National Cultural Dimensions and Adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (SMEs)","authors":"Karim Mhedhbi, Moez Essid","doi":"10.1142/s1094406022500044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research problem: This study investigates whether the adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for small- and medium-sized entities (SMEs) is linked to national culture. Motivation or theoretical reasoning: Little is known about the role of cultural dimensions in explaining countries’ adoption of the IFRS for SMEs. Focusing on this topic could contribute to a better understanding of the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs and would enrich the international accounting literature. Conducting a specific empirical investigation into the IFRS for SMEs is motivated by the difference between the full IFRS and the IFRS for SMEs, by the inherent characteristics of SMEs, and by differences between the number of countries that adopted the full IFRS and those that have adopted the IFRS for SMEs. The test hypotheses: We used Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture (Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long-term Orientation, and Indulgence) to capture a country’s culture. We expected that these six dimensions would play a crucial role in countries’ decision to adopt the IFRS for SMEs. Based on previous relevant studies, we developed a research hypothesis for each of the mentioned cultural dimensions. Target population: We selected the 101 countries included in Hofstede’s study. For each country, we looked at the data available on the IFRS website to identify its position in relation to the IFRS for SMEs. The final sample included 97 countries. Adopted methodology: After classifying countries in three groups (Non-Adopters, Voluntary Adopters, and Mandatory Adopters), we performed several statistical regressions with adoption of the IFRS for SMEs as the dependent variable and the cultural dimensions as the relevant independent variables. Analyses: Among others, we used several logistic regressions to estimate the association between national culture and the use of the IFRS for SMEs. We initially performed a statistical estimation for each of the six dimensions of national culture. Then, we included all cultural dimensions simultaneously. Finally, we performed robustness tests by applying multinomial regressions and focusing on the group of full IFRS adopters. Findings: Empirical results revealed that the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs was less likely in countries with the highest levels of individualism. This conclusion held for both Mandatory and Voluntary Adopters. In contrast, the other dimensions of national culture were not significant in explaining the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs by national accounting regulators.","PeriodicalId":47122,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1094406022500044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The research problem: This study investigates whether the adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for small- and medium-sized entities (SMEs) is linked to national culture. Motivation or theoretical reasoning: Little is known about the role of cultural dimensions in explaining countries’ adoption of the IFRS for SMEs. Focusing on this topic could contribute to a better understanding of the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs and would enrich the international accounting literature. Conducting a specific empirical investigation into the IFRS for SMEs is motivated by the difference between the full IFRS and the IFRS for SMEs, by the inherent characteristics of SMEs, and by differences between the number of countries that adopted the full IFRS and those that have adopted the IFRS for SMEs. The test hypotheses: We used Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture (Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long-term Orientation, and Indulgence) to capture a country’s culture. We expected that these six dimensions would play a crucial role in countries’ decision to adopt the IFRS for SMEs. Based on previous relevant studies, we developed a research hypothesis for each of the mentioned cultural dimensions. Target population: We selected the 101 countries included in Hofstede’s study. For each country, we looked at the data available on the IFRS website to identify its position in relation to the IFRS for SMEs. The final sample included 97 countries. Adopted methodology: After classifying countries in three groups (Non-Adopters, Voluntary Adopters, and Mandatory Adopters), we performed several statistical regressions with adoption of the IFRS for SMEs as the dependent variable and the cultural dimensions as the relevant independent variables. Analyses: Among others, we used several logistic regressions to estimate the association between national culture and the use of the IFRS for SMEs. We initially performed a statistical estimation for each of the six dimensions of national culture. Then, we included all cultural dimensions simultaneously. Finally, we performed robustness tests by applying multinomial regressions and focusing on the group of full IFRS adopters. Findings: Empirical results revealed that the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs was less likely in countries with the highest levels of individualism. This conclusion held for both Mandatory and Voluntary Adopters. In contrast, the other dimensions of national culture were not significant in explaining the adoption of the IFRS for SMEs by national accounting regulators.
期刊介绍:
The aim of The International Journal of Accounting is to advance the academic and professional understanding of accounting theory, policies and practice from the international perspective and viewpoint. The Journal editorial recognizes that international accounting is influenced by a variety of forces, e.g., governmental, political and economic. Thus, the primary criterion for manuscript evaluation is the incremental contribution to international accounting literature and the forces that impact the field. The Journal aims at understanding the present and potential ability of accounting to aid in analyzing and interpreting international economic transactions and the economic consequences of such reporting. These transactions may be within a profit or non-profit environment. The Journal encourages a broad view of the origins and development of accounting with an emphasis on its functions in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The Journal also welcomes manuscripts that help explain current international accounting practices, with related theoretical justifications, and identify criticisms of current policies and practice. Other than occasional commissioned papers or special issues, all the manuscripts published in the Journal are selected by the editors after the normal double-blind refereeing process.