Duplex Surveillance after Primary Balloon Angioplasty or Directional Atherectomy for Treating Infrainguinal Arterial Disease

Kyungpyo Hong, Sungsin Cho, J. Joh
{"title":"Duplex Surveillance after Primary Balloon Angioplasty or Directional Atherectomy for Treating Infrainguinal Arterial Disease","authors":"Kyungpyo Hong, Sungsin Cho, J. Joh","doi":"10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Received October 5, 2019 Revised November 18, 2019 Accepted November 26, 2019 Purpose: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) shows an attractive outcome for treating infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease (IAOD). However, this procedure requires repeated revascularization and additional stenting. Directional atherectomy (DA) has been reported to be a modality that requires less frequent use of stenting. The aim of this study was to compare the duplex-based outcomes between PTA and DA for treating IAOD. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with IAOD treated with PTA and DA was completed. The demographics and procedural data were obtained. A provisional stent was placed in those cases with flow-limiting dissection and residual stenosis after PTA or DA. Technical success was defined as a residual stenosis < 30%. The primary patency rate was evaluated by performing duplex scanning. The clinical outcomes and frequency of stent placement for each procedure were evaluated. For statistical analysis, the data was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp, Chicago, Ill). All P values were considered significant if less than 0.05. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 71.5 ± 10.2 years. The male-to-female ratio was 49:22. Thirty-three patients underwent PTA. DA was performed in 38 patients (42 limbs). Technical success was achieved in all the patients. The duplex-based clinical outcome and limb salvage rate were similar in the two groups. Bailout stent placement was performed in 8 of 33 patients (24.2%) in the PTA group and in no patient in the DA group. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes were similar for both the DA and primary PTA groups. Atherectomy reduced the need for bailout stent placement as compared with bailout stent placement in primary PTA.","PeriodicalId":33937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Received October 5, 2019 Revised November 18, 2019 Accepted November 26, 2019 Purpose: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) shows an attractive outcome for treating infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease (IAOD). However, this procedure requires repeated revascularization and additional stenting. Directional atherectomy (DA) has been reported to be a modality that requires less frequent use of stenting. The aim of this study was to compare the duplex-based outcomes between PTA and DA for treating IAOD. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with IAOD treated with PTA and DA was completed. The demographics and procedural data were obtained. A provisional stent was placed in those cases with flow-limiting dissection and residual stenosis after PTA or DA. Technical success was defined as a residual stenosis < 30%. The primary patency rate was evaluated by performing duplex scanning. The clinical outcomes and frequency of stent placement for each procedure were evaluated. For statistical analysis, the data was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp, Chicago, Ill). All P values were considered significant if less than 0.05. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 71.5 ± 10.2 years. The male-to-female ratio was 49:22. Thirty-three patients underwent PTA. DA was performed in 38 patients (42 limbs). Technical success was achieved in all the patients. The duplex-based clinical outcome and limb salvage rate were similar in the two groups. Bailout stent placement was performed in 8 of 33 patients (24.2%) in the PTA group and in no patient in the DA group. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes were similar for both the DA and primary PTA groups. Atherectomy reduced the need for bailout stent placement as compared with bailout stent placement in primary PTA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性球囊血管成形术或定向动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗腹股沟下动脉疾病后的双重监测
接收日期2019年10月5日修订日期2019年11月18日接受日期2019年12月26日目的:经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)在治疗腹股沟下动脉闭塞性疾病(IAOD)方面显示出有吸引力的疗效。然而,这种手术需要反复进行血运重建和额外的支架植入。据报道,定向斑块切除术(DA)是一种不太频繁使用支架的方式。本研究的目的是比较PTA和DA治疗IAOD的双重疗效。方法:对连续接受PTA和DA治疗的IAOD患者进行回顾性分析。获得了人口统计数据和程序数据。在PTA或DA后出现限流夹层和残余狭窄的病例中放置临时支架。技术成功定义为残余狭窄<30%。初次通畅率通过双重扫描进行评估。评估每种手术的临床结果和支架置入频率。为了进行统计分析,使用SPSS 22.0软件(IBM Corp,Chicago,IL)对数据进行分析。如果小于0.05,则所有P值均被认为是显著的。结果:71名患者被纳入研究。平均年龄71.5±10.2岁。男女比例为49:22。33名患者接受了PTA。对38例患者(42条肢体)进行了DA检查。所有患者都取得了技术上的成功。两组患者的双相临床结果和肢体挽救率相似。PTA组33名患者中有8名(24.2%)进行了Bailout支架置入,DA组没有患者进行。结论:DA组和原发性PTA组的临床结果相似。与原发性PTA中的辅助支架放置相比,动脉粥样硬化切除术减少了辅助支架放置的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Leg Ulcers Accompanied by Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Lymphedema Caused by IgG4-Related Disease Ultrasound Risk Stratification System of Thyroid Nodule Effects of Ultrasound Targeted Destruction of Echogenic Nanobubbles Containing Doxorubicin in Rat Liver Correlation of Resistive Index Values Using Spectral Doppler Ultrasound with Histopathological Results in Breast Tumors Diagnostic Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1