Using Dialogic Writing Assessment to Support the Development of Historical Literacy

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1111/lit.12309
Sarah W. Beck, Andrew O. del Calvo
{"title":"Using Dialogic Writing Assessment to Support the Development of Historical Literacy","authors":"Sarah W. Beck,&nbsp;Andrew O. del Calvo","doi":"10.1111/lit.12309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Though discipline-specific approaches to literacy instruction can support adolescents' academic literacy and identity development, scant attention has been paid to ways of targeting such instruction to address individual student needs. Dialogic writing assessment is an approach to conducting writing conferences that foregrounds students' composing process so that teachers can assess and support that process with instructional feedback. Because such feedback is immediate, teachers can observe how students take it up. While dialogic assessment has shown promise as an approach to revealing and supporting students' writing processes in English Language Arts classrooms, it remains to be explored how this approach can support developing writers in other subject areas. This paper offers an analytic narrative account of how a high school social studies teacher used this method to support the writing process of one student, exploring what the method revealed about the challenges the student faced in writing about history, the gaps and misconceptions in their understanding of history and the intersection between the two. We discuss how certain ‘mediational moves’ the teacher employed enabled the student to compose collaboratively with the teacher, and in this collaborative composing, to capture ideas that she later used in her independent writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"57 1","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.12309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though discipline-specific approaches to literacy instruction can support adolescents' academic literacy and identity development, scant attention has been paid to ways of targeting such instruction to address individual student needs. Dialogic writing assessment is an approach to conducting writing conferences that foregrounds students' composing process so that teachers can assess and support that process with instructional feedback. Because such feedback is immediate, teachers can observe how students take it up. While dialogic assessment has shown promise as an approach to revealing and supporting students' writing processes in English Language Arts classrooms, it remains to be explored how this approach can support developing writers in other subject areas. This paper offers an analytic narrative account of how a high school social studies teacher used this method to support the writing process of one student, exploring what the method revealed about the challenges the student faced in writing about history, the gaps and misconceptions in their understanding of history and the intersection between the two. We discuss how certain ‘mediational moves’ the teacher employed enabled the student to compose collaboratively with the teacher, and in this collaborative composing, to capture ideas that she later used in her independent writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用对话写作评价支持历史素养的发展
虽然特定学科的扫盲教学方法可以支持青少年的学术扫盲和身份发展,但很少注意有针对性的这种教学方法来满足学生的个人需求。对话式写作评估是一种召开写作会议的方法,它突出了学生的写作过程,以便教师可以通过教学反馈来评估和支持这一过程。因为这样的反馈是即时的,老师可以观察到学生是如何接受的。虽然对话评估作为一种揭示和支持学生在英语语言艺术课堂上写作过程的方法已经显示出前景,但这种方法如何支持其他学科领域的发展作家仍有待探索。本文分析了一名高中社会研究教师如何使用这种方法来支持一名学生的写作过程,探讨了这种方法揭示了学生在写历史时面临的挑战,他们对历史的理解中的差距和误解,以及两者之间的交集。我们讨论了老师使用的某些“冥想动作”如何使学生能够与老师合作写作,并在这种合作写作中捕捉她后来在独立写作中使用的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial: The Writing Realities Framework and new directions in writing research, instruction and learning ‘Something I've carried with me’: Visibility and vulnerability within the writing journeys of preservice secondary English teachers Daybooks: Writers' notebooks reveal the processes, genre choices and reflections of fourth-grade writers Using constructs of ‘good’ writing to develop ‘a voice of one's own’ in the primary school classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1