Comparative Study of Intravenous Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Severe COVID -19 Patients Requiring Respiratory Support in Intensive Care Unit

L. Rajbanshi, A. Rayamajhi, A. Bajracharya, R. Shah
{"title":"Comparative Study of Intravenous Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Severe COVID -19 Patients Requiring Respiratory Support in Intensive Care Unit","authors":"L. Rajbanshi, A. Rayamajhi, A. Bajracharya, R. Shah","doi":"10.3126/jcmsn.v18i3.47897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Numerous steroids have been used to combat the intense cytokine storms in severe COVID pneumonia. The study compares the use methylprednisolone and dexamethasone as an adjuvant steroid therapy in severe COVID-19 pneumonia.\nMethods: Prospective comparative study including total of 190 COVID-19 severe pneumonia cases admitted in intensive care unit with 93 patients randomly allocated to receive dexamethasone 6 mg and 97 patients allocated to receive methylprednisolone 1mg/kg in two divided doses both by intravenous route for 7 days. Mortality was compared as primary objective while oxygenation parameters and inflammatory markers, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of ventilation, length of ICU-stay, incidence of multiorgan failure were assessed as secondary variables.\nResults: At day zero, the patient in methylprednisolone group had significantly lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio (258.3950.36 vs 285.1868.62, P=0.002). At day seven, methylprednisolone significantly improved PaO2/FIO2 ratio (266.5260.73 vs 244.8175.36, P=0.029) and there was substantial decrease in inflammatory markers CRP, Ferritin (P<0.05). PEEP requirement was significantly less with methylprednisolone (P=0.007). Methylprednisolone significantly reduced the incidence of multiorgan failure, need of invasive mechanical ventilation and duration of mechanical ventilation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in terms of duration of ICU stay and 30 days in hospital mortality between the two groups\nConclusions: Intravenous methylprednisolone significantly improved the oxygenation of COVID -19 pneumonia patients and decreased the inflammatory reactions as compared to similar dose of dexamethasone when given for week duration. However, methylprednisolone did not seem to be superior to dexamethasone in terms of improving mortality.","PeriodicalId":15436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v18i3.47897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous steroids have been used to combat the intense cytokine storms in severe COVID pneumonia. The study compares the use methylprednisolone and dexamethasone as an adjuvant steroid therapy in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: Prospective comparative study including total of 190 COVID-19 severe pneumonia cases admitted in intensive care unit with 93 patients randomly allocated to receive dexamethasone 6 mg and 97 patients allocated to receive methylprednisolone 1mg/kg in two divided doses both by intravenous route for 7 days. Mortality was compared as primary objective while oxygenation parameters and inflammatory markers, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of ventilation, length of ICU-stay, incidence of multiorgan failure were assessed as secondary variables. Results: At day zero, the patient in methylprednisolone group had significantly lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio (258.3950.36 vs 285.1868.62, P=0.002). At day seven, methylprednisolone significantly improved PaO2/FIO2 ratio (266.5260.73 vs 244.8175.36, P=0.029) and there was substantial decrease in inflammatory markers CRP, Ferritin (P<0.05). PEEP requirement was significantly less with methylprednisolone (P=0.007). Methylprednisolone significantly reduced the incidence of multiorgan failure, need of invasive mechanical ventilation and duration of mechanical ventilation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in terms of duration of ICU stay and 30 days in hospital mortality between the two groups Conclusions: Intravenous methylprednisolone significantly improved the oxygenation of COVID -19 pneumonia patients and decreased the inflammatory reactions as compared to similar dose of dexamethasone when given for week duration. However, methylprednisolone did not seem to be superior to dexamethasone in terms of improving mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射地塞米松与甲基强的松龙治疗重症监护病房呼吸支持重症患者的比较研究
引言:许多类固醇已被用于对抗严重新冠肺炎中的强烈细胞因子风暴。该研究比较了甲基强的松龙和地塞米松作为严重新冠肺炎肺炎的辅助类固醇治疗。方法:前瞻性比较研究,包括190例入住重症监护室的新冠肺炎重症肺炎病例,其中93例患者随机分配接受地塞米松6mg,97例患者分配接受甲基强的松龙1mg/kg,分两次静脉注射,每次7天。死亡率作为主要目标进行比较,而氧合参数和炎症标志物、有创机械通气的需要、通气持续时间、ICU住院时间、多器官衰竭的发生率作为次要变量进行评估。结果:第0天,甲基强的松龙组患者的PaO2/FIO2比值显著降低(258.3950.36 vs 285.1886.62,P=0.002)。第7天,甲基强的松龙显著改善了PaO2/FIO2比值(266.5260.73 vs 244.8175.36,P=0.029),炎症标志物CRP显著降低,Ferritin(P<0.05)。甲基强的松龙对PEEP的需求显著降低(P=0.007)。甲基强的松显著降低了多器官衰竭的发生率、有创机械通气的需要和机械通气的持续时间(P<0.05),两组患者的ICU住院时间和住院30天死亡率无显著差异。结论:与相同剂量的地塞米松相比,静脉注射甲基强的松龙可显著改善COVID-19肺炎患者的氧合,减少炎症反应。然而,在提高死亡率方面,甲基强的松龙似乎并不优于地塞米松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parental Satisfaction Regarding Online Education of Their Children During COVID-19 Pandemic Blood Pressure and Hematoma Expansion in Hemorrhagic Stroke Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower Calyceal Stones of ≤ 2 cm Potential Nephrotoxic Sequel of the Kidney Following Exposure to Turmeric Extract in Adult Wistar Rats Clinical Psychopathology During Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1