Esophageal cancer in young patients: does age affect treatment course and outcomes?

Ethan Y. Song, S. Naffouje, Sabrina Saeed, A. Glaser, Miles E. Cameron, J. Fontaine, L. Peña, M. Friedman, R. Mehta, Sarah Hoffe, J. Frakes, J. Pimiento
{"title":"Esophageal cancer in young patients: does age affect treatment course and outcomes?","authors":"Ethan Y. Song, S. Naffouje, Sabrina Saeed, A. Glaser, Miles E. Cameron, J. Fontaine, L. Peña, M. Friedman, R. Mehta, Sarah Hoffe, J. Frakes, J. Pimiento","doi":"10.21037/AOE-20-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Young patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are believed to have more aggressive disease, thus thought to have worse survival. Herein, we aim to study the impact of younger age on the short- and long-term outcomes of esophagectomy for EC. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC at our institution between 1994–2019 were included. Age 50 was defined as the cutoff for “young” vs . “old”. Patients from each age group were propensity-score matched 1:1 to compare postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: Our database reported 1,031 patients, 112 of whom were in the ‘young’ group. For the unmatched analysis, young patients were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma, higher rates of locally advanced disease, and subsequently higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (79.5% vs . 68.3%; P=0.047). After matching for pre-treatment clinical factors, young patients were less likely to have pulmonary or cardiac complications after surgery, and three times more likely to receive AC despite matching for stage and response to treatment (26.7% vs . 7.9%; P=0.002). Then, we matched patients including receipt of AC to study survival. In the second match, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for young patients was 49.0±26.0 vs . old 27.0±5.4 months (P=0.215). Median overall survival (OS) for young was 73.0±28.9 vs . old 31.0±6.3 months (P=0.073). Conclusions: Young EC patients tend to present with more advanced disease. However, when matched for stage and response to therapies, young patients were three-times more likely to be offered AC. After adjusting for receipt of adjuvant therapy no difference was detected in RFS.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-20-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Young patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are believed to have more aggressive disease, thus thought to have worse survival. Herein, we aim to study the impact of younger age on the short- and long-term outcomes of esophagectomy for EC. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC at our institution between 1994–2019 were included. Age 50 was defined as the cutoff for “young” vs . “old”. Patients from each age group were propensity-score matched 1:1 to compare postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: Our database reported 1,031 patients, 112 of whom were in the ‘young’ group. For the unmatched analysis, young patients were more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma, higher rates of locally advanced disease, and subsequently higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (79.5% vs . 68.3%; P=0.047). After matching for pre-treatment clinical factors, young patients were less likely to have pulmonary or cardiac complications after surgery, and three times more likely to receive AC despite matching for stage and response to treatment (26.7% vs . 7.9%; P=0.002). Then, we matched patients including receipt of AC to study survival. In the second match, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for young patients was 49.0±26.0 vs . old 27.0±5.4 months (P=0.215). Median overall survival (OS) for young was 73.0±28.9 vs . old 31.0±6.3 months (P=0.073). Conclusions: Young EC patients tend to present with more advanced disease. However, when matched for stage and response to therapies, young patients were three-times more likely to be offered AC. After adjusting for receipt of adjuvant therapy no difference was detected in RFS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻食管癌患者:年龄是否影响治疗过程和结果?
背景:年轻食管癌(EC)患者被认为具有更强的侵袭性,因此被认为生存率较差。在此,我们的目的是研究年轻对食管切除术治疗EC的短期和长期结果的影响。方法:纳入1994-2019年在我院接受食管切除术的EC患者。50岁被定义为“年轻”与“年轻”的分界线。“老”。每个年龄组的患者进行倾向评分1:1匹配,以比较术后和生存结果。结果:我们的数据库报告了1031例患者,其中112例属于“年轻”组。在非匹配分析中,年轻患者更容易患鳞状细胞癌,局部晚期疾病的发生率更高,随后新辅助化疗的发生率更高(79.5% vs . 79.5%)。68.3%;P = 0.047)。在匹配治疗前临床因素后,年轻患者术后发生肺部或心脏并发症的可能性较小,尽管分期和治疗反应匹配,但接受AC治疗的可能性是前者的三倍(26.7% vs。7.9%;P = 0.002)。然后,我们匹配包括接受AC的患者来研究生存率。在第二次配对中,年轻患者的中位无复发生存期(RFS)为49.0±26.0。年龄27.0±5.4个月(P=0.215)。年轻人的中位总生存期(OS)为73.0±28.9;老年31.0±6.3个月(P=0.073)。结论:年轻的EC患者往往表现为更晚期的疾病。然而,当分期和对治疗的反应相匹配时,年轻患者接受AC治疗的可能性增加了三倍。在调整接受辅助治疗后,RFS没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1