Can Civil Society Be Inclusive? Strategies for Endowed Foundations

IF 0.7 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Foundation Review Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.9707/1944-5660.1539
Irene M. H. Davids, Lucas Meijs
{"title":"Can Civil Society Be Inclusive? Strategies for Endowed Foundations","authors":"Irene M. H. Davids, Lucas Meijs","doi":"10.9707/1944-5660.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literature on inclusion and exclusion within civil society distinguishes two broad approaches: the managerial, based on the private sphere, and the democratic, based upon the public sphere. Regardless of the approach, however, the influence of cultural distance or proximity between endowed foundations and grassroots associations has remained understudied. This article shares results of a quantitative comparison of the patterns of funding awarded by a regional endowed foundation in the Netherlands to immigrant grassroots associations and to other grassroots organizations. The results reveal differences in funding despite the foundation’s inclusive strategy. While the literature on the nonprofit sector is increasingly dominated by a businesslike approach, such practices may not necessarily improve grantmaking for endowed foundations. The galvanizing public murder of George Floyd and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Black and Hispanic people have put structural racism and its influence on wealth inequality in the U.S. into stark relief. As multiracial groups express outrage at these visible disparities, we risk missing the other side of the coin: that wealth inequality in turn fans structural racism. Understanding and then breaking this vicious cycle are essential to realizing our renewed commitment to a country that works for everyone. This article seeks to draw renewed attention to the damaging impacts of wealth inequality, its root causes, and strategies for overcoming it. This article specifically applies systems thinking to identify the root causes of wealth inequality, including structural racism, and then proposes four primary strategies for both fairly distributing and generating new wealth. The service areas of nonprofit infrastructure organizations can be divided into three categories: those that support the nonprofit sector as a whole, those that assist nonprofit organizations and their staffs, and those that devote their resources to the communities or region they serve. This article presents a case study of one region in which all three types of organizations were asked to share their responses to nonprofits that sought help in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic. The diversity of services and business models revealed in the sample illustrates the range of complementary resources that benefit service-delivery nonprofits and their communities. and its partners launched a systems philanthropy strategy to address income inequality and stimulate inclusive growth. The strategy involves a multipronged approach aimed at amplifying the county’s strengths, launching inclusive-growth initiatives, expanding workforce training and skill development to increase a broad target population’s earning potential and net worth, incentivizing and supporting small-business resiliency and growth, and revitalizing and reinventing struggling local industries. To measure progress, the foundation maintains quality of life indicators for data on income, equity, businesses, education, and jobs. This article shares insights into systems philanthropy, the roles played by the foundation and its business and community partners, and how funders can reduce income inequality by investing systemically in inclusive growth. Foundation practice — how a foundation goes about its work — plays a significant role in determining the results of the work, particularly for foundations that take on roles that position them as part of the action rather than solely as sources of funds. This article aims to build upon the lessons from past place-based work and provide new knowledge by examining the practices of The California Endowment as it designed, implemented, and learned from Building Healthy Communities, a $1.75 billion ten-year initiative to promote health equity. The article suggests strategies that appeared key to effective board governance of BHC over a ten-year period. The article includes reflections about what it takes for a private foundation to succeed in such a complex and long-term enterprise.","PeriodicalId":42766,"journal":{"name":"Foundation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literature on inclusion and exclusion within civil society distinguishes two broad approaches: the managerial, based on the private sphere, and the democratic, based upon the public sphere. Regardless of the approach, however, the influence of cultural distance or proximity between endowed foundations and grassroots associations has remained understudied. This article shares results of a quantitative comparison of the patterns of funding awarded by a regional endowed foundation in the Netherlands to immigrant grassroots associations and to other grassroots organizations. The results reveal differences in funding despite the foundation’s inclusive strategy. While the literature on the nonprofit sector is increasingly dominated by a businesslike approach, such practices may not necessarily improve grantmaking for endowed foundations. The galvanizing public murder of George Floyd and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Black and Hispanic people have put structural racism and its influence on wealth inequality in the U.S. into stark relief. As multiracial groups express outrage at these visible disparities, we risk missing the other side of the coin: that wealth inequality in turn fans structural racism. Understanding and then breaking this vicious cycle are essential to realizing our renewed commitment to a country that works for everyone. This article seeks to draw renewed attention to the damaging impacts of wealth inequality, its root causes, and strategies for overcoming it. This article specifically applies systems thinking to identify the root causes of wealth inequality, including structural racism, and then proposes four primary strategies for both fairly distributing and generating new wealth. The service areas of nonprofit infrastructure organizations can be divided into three categories: those that support the nonprofit sector as a whole, those that assist nonprofit organizations and their staffs, and those that devote their resources to the communities or region they serve. This article presents a case study of one region in which all three types of organizations were asked to share their responses to nonprofits that sought help in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic. The diversity of services and business models revealed in the sample illustrates the range of complementary resources that benefit service-delivery nonprofits and their communities. and its partners launched a systems philanthropy strategy to address income inequality and stimulate inclusive growth. The strategy involves a multipronged approach aimed at amplifying the county’s strengths, launching inclusive-growth initiatives, expanding workforce training and skill development to increase a broad target population’s earning potential and net worth, incentivizing and supporting small-business resiliency and growth, and revitalizing and reinventing struggling local industries. To measure progress, the foundation maintains quality of life indicators for data on income, equity, businesses, education, and jobs. This article shares insights into systems philanthropy, the roles played by the foundation and its business and community partners, and how funders can reduce income inequality by investing systemically in inclusive growth. Foundation practice — how a foundation goes about its work — plays a significant role in determining the results of the work, particularly for foundations that take on roles that position them as part of the action rather than solely as sources of funds. This article aims to build upon the lessons from past place-based work and provide new knowledge by examining the practices of The California Endowment as it designed, implemented, and learned from Building Healthy Communities, a $1.75 billion ten-year initiative to promote health equity. The article suggests strategies that appeared key to effective board governance of BHC over a ten-year period. The article includes reflections about what it takes for a private foundation to succeed in such a complex and long-term enterprise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民社会能包容吗?捐赠基金会的策略
关于民间社会包容和排斥的文献区分了两种广泛的方法:基于私人领域的管理方法和基于公共领域的民主方法。然而,无论采用何种方法,捐赠基金会和基层协会之间的文化距离或接近程度的影响仍然研究不足。本文分享了荷兰一个地区捐赠基金会向移民基层协会和其他基层组织提供资金模式的定量比较结果。研究结果显示,尽管基金会采取了包容性战略,但在资金方面存在差异。虽然非营利部门的文献越来越多地被商业化的方法所主导,但这种做法可能不一定能改善捐赠基金会的拨款。乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被公开谋杀以及新冠肺炎对黑人和西班牙裔人的不成比例的影响,使结构性种族主义及其对美国财富不平等的影响得到了明显缓解。当多种族群体对这些明显的差异表示愤怒时,我们有可能错过硬币的另一面:财富不平等反过来又助长了结构性种族主义。理解并打破这种恶性循环对于实现我们对一个为每个人服务的国家的新承诺至关重要。本文试图重新引起人们对财富不平等的破坏性影响、根源和克服策略的关注。本文特别运用系统思维来识别财富不平等(包括结构性种族主义)的根源,然后提出了公平分配和创造新财富的四个主要策略。非营利基础设施组织的服务领域可分为三类:支持整个非营利部门的服务领域、帮助非营利组织及其员工的服务领域,以及将资源投入其服务的社区或地区的服务领域。这篇文章介绍了一个地区的案例研究,在该地区,所有三种类型的组织都被要求分享他们对寻求帮助应对冠状病毒大流行的非营利组织的回应。样本中揭示的服务和商业模式的多样性说明了有利于服务提供非营利组织及其社区的互补资源的范围。其合作伙伴推出了一项系统慈善战略,以解决收入不平等问题,刺激包容性增长。该战略涉及一种多管齐下的方法,旨在扩大该县的优势,启动包容性增长举措,扩大劳动力培训和技能发展,以提高广泛的目标人群的收入潜力和净值,激励和支持小企业的弹性和增长,振兴和重塑陷入困境的当地产业。为了衡量进展,该基金会为收入、公平、商业、教育和就业等数据维护生活质量指标。本文分享了对系统慈善事业的见解,基金会及其商业和社区合作伙伴所扮演的角色,以及资助者如何通过系统投资于包容性增长来减少收入不平等。基金会实践——基金会如何开展工作——在决定工作结果方面发挥着重要作用,尤其是对于那些将基金会定位为行动的一部分而不仅仅是资金来源的基金会来说。本文旨在借鉴过去基于地方的工作的经验教训,并通过研究加州捐赠基金会设计、实施的做法,以及从建设健康社区中吸取的教训,提供新的知识,这是一项17.5亿美元的十年计划,旨在促进健康公平。文章提出了银行控股公司董事会在十年内有效治理的关键策略。这篇文章包括对私人基金会如何在如此复杂和长期的企业中取得成功的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foundation Review
Foundation Review SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Foundation Review is the first peer-reviewed journal of philanthropy, written by and for foundation staff and boards and those who work with them. Each quarterly issue provides peer-reviewed reports about the field of philanthropy, including reports by foundations on their own work. The Foundation Review is a hybrid journal, with a mix of subscriber-only and open-access content. Sponsored issues may be completely open access. Authors may pay to have articles made open access. All articles become open access two years after publication.
期刊最新文献
Theory of a Philanthropic Alliance: The Case of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food Place-Based Initiatives by National Funders: Reflections from a Recovering Place-Based Funder Evaluating Evaluation Policy in the X Foundation Achieving Sustainability in Community Health Initiatives: Follow the Money TFR 15.1 Full Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1