G.B. Riccioli’s geo-heliocentric use of Epicepicycles, ellipses and spirals

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Journal for the History of Astronomy Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/00218286231165331
F. Marcacci
{"title":"G.B. Riccioli’s geo-heliocentric use of Epicepicycles, ellipses and spirals","authors":"F. Marcacci","doi":"10.1177/00218286231165331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598–1671), planets describe orbits in a fluid heaven in a helio-geocentric model of cosmos. In his Almagestum Novum (1651) he stresses the need for a novel and rigorous geometrical explanation for the motion of heavenly bodies, which considers a separate Primum Mobile as an unnecessary hypothesis. Riccioli rejects the standard eccentric-epicycle theory as unsatisfactory and argues for what he calls “Eccentrepicyclos” or “Epicepicycles.” He takes the Keplerian elliptical theory into account and includes a variable oscillation of both the mobile eccentric center and the variation of the epicycle’s diameter. As a result, planets move along spiral orbits that have variable sizes. The inequalities, which astronomers had always tried to explain, are now justified: the spiral trajectory, obtained by means of the oscillation of the eccentric center, warrants the first inequality, about the variation of the planets’ velocity. The variable amplitude of the spirals, obtained by the variation of the epicycle’s diameter, explains the second inequality, namely the apparent retrograde or progressive planetary motion. In the later work Astronomia Reformata (1665), Riccioli uses explicitly the term “ellipse.” Riccioli’s innovations are of great interest and help to understand the complexity of the astronomical debates about the best world-system.","PeriodicalId":56280,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","volume":"54 1","pages":"171 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286231165331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598–1671), planets describe orbits in a fluid heaven in a helio-geocentric model of cosmos. In his Almagestum Novum (1651) he stresses the need for a novel and rigorous geometrical explanation for the motion of heavenly bodies, which considers a separate Primum Mobile as an unnecessary hypothesis. Riccioli rejects the standard eccentric-epicycle theory as unsatisfactory and argues for what he calls “Eccentrepicyclos” or “Epicepicycles.” He takes the Keplerian elliptical theory into account and includes a variable oscillation of both the mobile eccentric center and the variation of the epicycle’s diameter. As a result, planets move along spiral orbits that have variable sizes. The inequalities, which astronomers had always tried to explain, are now justified: the spiral trajectory, obtained by means of the oscillation of the eccentric center, warrants the first inequality, about the variation of the planets’ velocity. The variable amplitude of the spirals, obtained by the variation of the epicycle’s diameter, explains the second inequality, namely the apparent retrograde or progressive planetary motion. In the later work Astronomia Reformata (1665), Riccioli uses explicitly the term “ellipse.” Riccioli’s innovations are of great interest and help to understand the complexity of the astronomical debates about the best world-system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
G.B.里乔利的地心说运用了本轮、椭圆和螺旋
根据乔瓦尼·巴蒂斯塔·里乔利(1598-1671)的理论,行星以日心说的宇宙模型描述了在一个流动的天堂中的轨道。在他的著作《新星》(1651)中,他强调需要一种新颖而严格的天体运动几何解释,这种解释认为单独的原初运动是一个不必要的假设。里乔利拒绝了标准的偏心本轮理论,认为它不令人满意,并提出了他所谓的“偏心本轮”或“本轮”。他把开普勒椭圆理论考虑在内,包括了移动偏心中心和本轮直径变化的可变振荡。因此,行星沿着大小不一的螺旋轨道运行。天文学家们一直试图解释的不平等现在得到了证明:通过偏心中心的振荡得到的螺旋轨迹证明了第一个关于行星速度变化的不平等。由本轮直径的变化得到的螺旋振幅的变化,解释了第二个不等式,即行星明显的逆行或前进运动。在后来的著作《天文改革》(Astronomia Reformata, 1665)中,里乔利明确使用了“椭圆”一词。里乔利的创新非常有趣,有助于理解关于最佳世界体系的天文学辩论的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Journal for the History of Astronomy 地学天文-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science History Publications Ltd is an academic publishing company established in 1971 and based in Cambridge, England. We specialize in journals in history of science and in particular history of astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Plato and planetary order: Uncertainty in the positions of Mercury and Venus The solar eclipse of A.D. 1221 May 23 and the value of ΔT Physicists becoming astronomers Present status of UBAI plate archive A Ptolemaic lunar model of the 17th century: François Viète and his first lunar model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1