Beyond the Buzzword: A Framework for an Indigenous Relational Evaluation in Traditional Communities in Ghana

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY American Journal of Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1177/10982140211048459
E. Boadu, I. Ile
{"title":"Beyond the Buzzword: A Framework for an Indigenous Relational Evaluation in Traditional Communities in Ghana","authors":"E. Boadu, I. Ile","doi":"10.1177/10982140211048459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notions of indigenous knowledge and cultural philosophies are becoming ubiquitous in many social inquiries and evaluation is no exception. Nonetheless, the pursuit to making evaluation impulses embedded in indigenous philosophies relevant in evaluation activities is yet to succeed. Thus, the article discusses the indigenous relational philosophies, approaches and practices of evaluation. Using qualitative research approaches, the study interviewed 43 indigenous development leaders and other local representatives in three local government areas in Ghana. Utilising evidence synthesis approaches through a triangulation process, the paper realised that indigenous knowledge and other cultural ethos were distinct in community-based development evaluation process. The study grasped that there is an elusive intersection between indigenous and contemporary evaluation paradigms. It was observed that former has principles such as community spirit, mutual trust, self-organisation, relational patterns or networks, “ubuntu” ideals, consensus building, collectiveness inter alia that can complement the latter for effective and efficient evaluation of community development programmes and social policies. The article identified key indigenous elements and other indigenous relational assessment patterns to design an indigenously driven relational evaluation framework. The evaluative competencies embedded in indigenous philosophies are vast, thus, a call for future research is proposed.","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211048459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The notions of indigenous knowledge and cultural philosophies are becoming ubiquitous in many social inquiries and evaluation is no exception. Nonetheless, the pursuit to making evaluation impulses embedded in indigenous philosophies relevant in evaluation activities is yet to succeed. Thus, the article discusses the indigenous relational philosophies, approaches and practices of evaluation. Using qualitative research approaches, the study interviewed 43 indigenous development leaders and other local representatives in three local government areas in Ghana. Utilising evidence synthesis approaches through a triangulation process, the paper realised that indigenous knowledge and other cultural ethos were distinct in community-based development evaluation process. The study grasped that there is an elusive intersection between indigenous and contemporary evaluation paradigms. It was observed that former has principles such as community spirit, mutual trust, self-organisation, relational patterns or networks, “ubuntu” ideals, consensus building, collectiveness inter alia that can complement the latter for effective and efficient evaluation of community development programmes and social policies. The article identified key indigenous elements and other indigenous relational assessment patterns to design an indigenously driven relational evaluation framework. The evaluative competencies embedded in indigenous philosophies are vast, thus, a call for future research is proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越流行语:加纳传统社区原住民关系评估框架
土著知识和文化哲学的概念在许多社会调查和评价中变得无处不在,也不例外。尽管如此,使嵌入在评价活动中的评价冲动与土著哲学相关的追求尚未取得成功。因此,本文探讨了中国本土的关系评价理念、方法和实践。该研究采用定性研究方法,采访了加纳三个地方政府领域的43名土著发展领导人和其他地方代表。本文利用三角测量过程中的证据综合方法,认识到土著知识和其他文化精神在社区发展评估过程中是独特的。该研究发现,本土评价范式与当代评价范式之间存在着难以捉摸的交集。有人指出,前者具有诸如社区精神、相互信任、自我组织、关系模式或网络、“集体”理想、建立协商一致意见、集体等原则,这些原则可以补充后者,以便有效地评价社区发展方案和社会政策。本文确定了关键的土著要素和其他土著关系评估模式,以设计一个土著驱动的关系评估框架。在本土哲学中嵌入的评估能力是巨大的,因此,提出了对未来研究的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
期刊最新文献
The Garden of Evaluation Approaches From the Section Editors: Teaching & Learning Section Vision: Innovate, Evaluate, Disseminate From the Co-Editors: Evolving Evaluation Theory, Methods, and Practice Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis as a Methodological Framework in Academic–Clinical Partnership Evaluation A Protocol for Participatory Data Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1