Rotational Thromboelastometry Values After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Maria S Gauger, P. Kaufmann, Firmin Kamber, J. Quitt, D. Berdajs, D. Bolliger, E. Mauermann
{"title":"Rotational Thromboelastometry Values After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery – A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Maria S Gauger, P. Kaufmann, Firmin Kamber, J. Quitt, D. Berdajs, D. Bolliger, E. Mauermann","doi":"10.1177/10892532221088216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Viscoelastic coagulation monitoring is recommended for coagulation management after cardiac surgery, but optimum target values are poorly defined. Aims To determine “to-be-expected” values in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) after heparin reversal, to correlate ROTEM parameters with fibrinogen levels and platelet count, and to estimate the effect of hemoglobin levels on these measurements. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 571 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from 12/2018 to 08/2020. ROTEM and conventional laboratory measurements were performed 5 to 10 minutes after protamine administration. Results Clotting times in EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM were significantly prolonged (72.6%, 96.1%, and 31.8% above reference ranges, respectively). Clot firmness parameters in EXTEM and INTEM were relevantly reduced (7.9% to 14.4% and 9.1% to 32.3% below the reference ranges, respectively). There was an excellent linear correlation of FIBTEM amplitude after 10 min (A10) and of maximal clot firmness (MCF) with fibrinogen concentrations (r = .81 and .80). Areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for identifying hypofibrinogenemia <1.5 g/L were between .80 and .87. No effect of hematocrit was observed. We also found a linear correlation of EXTEM, INTEM, and EXTEM-FIBTEM at both A10 and MCF with platelet counts (.32 to .68). The AUROCs for identifying thrombocytopenia (<100,000/μL) were .79 to .84, and were greater for A10 than for MCF measurements (P=.074, .001, and <.001, respectively). Conclusions “To-be-expected” ROTEM values after CPB are different from the published reference ranges. ROTEM parameters might allow for reliable estimation of fibrinogen level and platelet count without being influenced by hematocrit.","PeriodicalId":46500,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892532221088216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Viscoelastic coagulation monitoring is recommended for coagulation management after cardiac surgery, but optimum target values are poorly defined. Aims To determine “to-be-expected” values in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) after heparin reversal, to correlate ROTEM parameters with fibrinogen levels and platelet count, and to estimate the effect of hemoglobin levels on these measurements. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 571 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from 12/2018 to 08/2020. ROTEM and conventional laboratory measurements were performed 5 to 10 minutes after protamine administration. Results Clotting times in EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM were significantly prolonged (72.6%, 96.1%, and 31.8% above reference ranges, respectively). Clot firmness parameters in EXTEM and INTEM were relevantly reduced (7.9% to 14.4% and 9.1% to 32.3% below the reference ranges, respectively). There was an excellent linear correlation of FIBTEM amplitude after 10 min (A10) and of maximal clot firmness (MCF) with fibrinogen concentrations (r = .81 and .80). Areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for identifying hypofibrinogenemia <1.5 g/L were between .80 and .87. No effect of hematocrit was observed. We also found a linear correlation of EXTEM, INTEM, and EXTEM-FIBTEM at both A10 and MCF with platelet counts (.32 to .68). The AUROCs for identifying thrombocytopenia (<100,000/μL) were .79 to .84, and were greater for A10 than for MCF measurements (P=.074, .001, and <.001, respectively). Conclusions “To-be-expected” ROTEM values after CPB are different from the published reference ranges. ROTEM parameters might allow for reliable estimation of fibrinogen level and platelet count without being influenced by hematocrit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无泵心脏手术后旋转血栓弹性测量值-一项回顾性队列研究
背景:粘弹性凝血监测被推荐用于心脏手术后的凝血管理,但最佳目标值尚未明确。目的确定肝素逆转后旋转血栓弹性测量(ROTEM)的“预期”值,将ROTEM参数与纤维蛋白原水平和血小板计数相关联,并估计血红蛋白水平对这些测量的影响。方法回顾性分析2018年12月至2020年8月连续571例接受心脏手术合并体外循环的成人患者。在鱼精蛋白给药后5至10分钟进行ROTEM和常规实验室测量。结果EXTEM、interm和FIBTEM的凝血时间明显延长(分别比参考范围延长72.6%、96.1%和31.8%)。EXTEM和INTEM的凝块硬度参数相应降低(分别比参考范围低7.9%至14.4%和9.1%至32.3%)。10 min后fitem振幅(A10)和最大凝块硬度(MCF)与纤维蛋白原浓度呈极好的线性相关(r = 0.81和0.80)。识别<1.5 g/L的低纤维蛋白原血症的受试者工作特征下面积(AUROC)在0.80 ~ 0.87之间。未观察到红细胞压积的影响。我们还发现A10和MCF的EXTEM、INTEM和EXTEM- fitem与血小板计数呈线性相关。32到0.68)。鉴定血小板减少症(<100,000/μL)的auroc为0.79 ~ 0.84,A10的auroc高于MCF (P=。074、0.001和<。001年,分别)。结论CPB后“预期”ROTEM值与已公布的参考范围存在差异。ROTEM参数可能允许可靠的估计纤维蛋白原水平和血小板计数,而不受红细胞压积的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Tracheal Bronchus and Successful Right-Sided Isolation With a Bronchial Blocker. Perioperative Point of Care Ultrasound for Hemodynamic Assessment: A Narrative Review. Endobronchial Intubation With the King Vision® and McGrath® Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways by Novices (eKingMath). Ultrasound-Guided Radial Arterial Catheterization in Patients With Regurgitant and Stenotic Left-Sided Cardiac Valvular Lesions. Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube vs EZ-Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1