Men and cockfight through the lens of multispecies ethnography: from the symbolism of masculinity to multispecies collaboration

IF 0.6 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal for Cultural Research Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/14797585.2021.1999172
P. Sanjatmiko
{"title":"Men and cockfight through the lens of multispecies ethnography: from the symbolism of masculinity to multispecies collaboration","authors":"P. Sanjatmiko","doi":"10.1080/14797585.2021.1999172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper calls for another perspective on cockfight and the symbolism of masculinity. Previous research on cockfighting has its own perspective and interesting findings, one such work on the matter was that of Geertz who focused on the symbolism of cockfighting within the context of Balinese culture. I argue that, as anthropological studies develop a number of anthropological approaches that produce a more holistic ethnography also evolve. One of them is multispecies ethnography. This approach places culture and nature on one equal level of analysis. This research involves Kampung Laut People in Segara Anakan, Indonesia. The data is collected through observation and in-depth interviews through the ‘art of noticing’ method. The findings of this research show a different perspective in understanding the practice of cockfighting through interspecies collaboration. In terms of scientific contributions, this paper introduces a multispecies ethnographic approach as another approach to understanding the socio-cultural phenomenon of cockfighting and human interactions with non-human species. This perspective complements Geertz’s symbolic cultural perspective. In terms of its contribution to humanitarian issues, the holistic multispecies perspective employed within this research advocates for a balanced interrelation between humans and other species in creating a sustainable ecological system.","PeriodicalId":44587,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Cultural Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"327 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2021.1999172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper calls for another perspective on cockfight and the symbolism of masculinity. Previous research on cockfighting has its own perspective and interesting findings, one such work on the matter was that of Geertz who focused on the symbolism of cockfighting within the context of Balinese culture. I argue that, as anthropological studies develop a number of anthropological approaches that produce a more holistic ethnography also evolve. One of them is multispecies ethnography. This approach places culture and nature on one equal level of analysis. This research involves Kampung Laut People in Segara Anakan, Indonesia. The data is collected through observation and in-depth interviews through the ‘art of noticing’ method. The findings of this research show a different perspective in understanding the practice of cockfighting through interspecies collaboration. In terms of scientific contributions, this paper introduces a multispecies ethnographic approach as another approach to understanding the socio-cultural phenomenon of cockfighting and human interactions with non-human species. This perspective complements Geertz’s symbolic cultural perspective. In terms of its contribution to humanitarian issues, the holistic multispecies perspective employed within this research advocates for a balanced interrelation between humans and other species in creating a sustainable ecological system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种族人种学视角下的男人与斗鸡:从男子气概的象征到多种族合作
本文从另一个角度探讨斗鸡和男子气概的象征意义。以前对斗鸡的研究有自己的观点和有趣的发现,其中一个这样的工作是Geertz,他专注于巴厘文化背景下斗鸡的象征意义。我认为,随着人类学研究的发展,产生更全面的民族志的许多人类学方法也在发展。其中之一是多物种人种学。这种方法把文化和自然放在一个平等的分析水平上。这项研究涉及印度尼西亚塞加拉阿纳坎的甘榜劳人。数据是通过观察和深度访谈,通过“注意的艺术”方法收集的。这项研究的结果显示了通过物种间合作来理解斗鸡实践的不同视角。在科学贡献方面,本文介绍了一种多物种人种志方法,作为理解斗鸡和人类与非人类物种相互作用的社会文化现象的另一种方法。这一观点与格尔茨的象征文化观点相辅相成。就其对人道主义问题的贡献而言,本研究中采用的整体多物种视角倡导人类与其他物种之间的平衡关系,以创造一个可持续的生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Cultural Research
Journal for Cultural Research CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: JouJournal for Cultural Research is an international journal, based in Lancaster University"s Institute for Cultural Research. It is interested in essays concerned with the conjuncture between culture and the many domains and practices in relation to which it is usually defined, including, for example, media, politics, technology, economics, society, art and the sacred. Culture is no longer, if it ever was, singular. It denotes a shifting multiplicity of signifying practices and value systems that provide a potentially infinite resource of academic critique, investigation and ethnographic or market research into cultural difference, cultural autonomy, cultural emancipation and the cultural aspects of power.
期刊最新文献
'Inchallah boza: between the forest, the bush and the town': migrants' language practices in Morocco. “Trauma scrambles things, trauma fragments…” A cross-cultural conversation with Corban Addison in the context of A Walk Across the Sun Revolutionary women, body, and the limits of nationalist ideology in colonial Bengal: re-reading the memoirs of Bina Das and Kamala Dasgupta The internalisation of cruelty: Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Masoch Dealing with fear: what dangers do incantations ward off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1