INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE INVESTOR–STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Indonesia Law Review Pub Date : 2020-04-30 DOI:10.15742/ILREV.V10N1.615
J. Leonard, Prita Amalia, A. Chandrawulan
{"title":"INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE INVESTOR–STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS","authors":"J. Leonard, Prita Amalia, A. Chandrawulan","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V10N1.615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment includes tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets are often connected with intellectual property which leads to intangible results. The lack of “visibility” in intangible assets makes them difficult to measure. Current international regulations have not also explicitly provided room for enforcement regarding intellectual property rights in terms of foreign investment. Therefore, an emergence of cases is observed in investment disputes within the field of intellectual property rights through the Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. In this research, we discuss cases of foreign investment disputes in such a field. From these cases, we find the factors that determine the occurrence of foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. The ISDS mechanism can be used to resolve foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property. Furthermore, this research discusses the perspective of Indonesian law regarding foreign investment disputes in the mentioned field by using the ISDS mechanism. Qualitative methods and secondary data analysis are also used. The research aims to discover and identify foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V10N1.615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Investment includes tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets are often connected with intellectual property which leads to intangible results. The lack of “visibility” in intangible assets makes them difficult to measure. Current international regulations have not also explicitly provided room for enforcement regarding intellectual property rights in terms of foreign investment. Therefore, an emergence of cases is observed in investment disputes within the field of intellectual property rights through the Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. In this research, we discuss cases of foreign investment disputes in such a field. From these cases, we find the factors that determine the occurrence of foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. The ISDS mechanism can be used to resolve foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property. Furthermore, this research discusses the perspective of Indonesian law regarding foreign investment disputes in the mentioned field by using the ISDS mechanism. Qualitative methods and secondary data analysis are also used. The research aims to discover and identify foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼对知识产权领域外商投资争端解决机制的看法
投资包括有形资产和无形资产。无形资产通常与知识产权联系在一起,知识产权会产生无形的结果。无形资产缺乏“可见性”,因此难以衡量。目前的国际法规也没有明确规定外国投资方面知识产权的执行余地。因此,通过投资者-国家争端解决机制(ISDS)在知识产权领域的投资争端中出现了案例。在本研究中,我们讨论了这一领域的外商投资纠纷案例。从这些案例中,我们发现了决定知识产权领域外商投资纠纷发生的因素。ISDS机制可用于解决知识产权领域的外商投资争端。此外,本研究利用ISDS机制探讨了印尼法律在上述领域中处理外商投资争端的视角。定性方法和二手数据分析也被使用。本研究旨在发现和识别知识产权领域的外商投资纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System Understanding the Role of Consent in Data Protection Regime: How Indonesia Can Learn From the GDPR Simple, Speedy, and Low Cost Trial : A Panacea For Corruption in Indonesia? THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EARTH OBSERVATION DATA IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: A CLOSER LOOK TOWARDS DATA IMAGING CRIMINISTRATIVE LAW: DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1