Geopolitics, Paralysis and Health Policy: On the Implications of the Dayton Peace Accords for Bosnia & Herzegovina’s Transplantation System

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geopolitics Pub Date : 2022-06-04 DOI:10.1080/14650045.2022.2078705
J. Miggelbrink, F. Meyer
{"title":"Geopolitics, Paralysis and Health Policy: On the Implications of the Dayton Peace Accords for Bosnia & Herzegovina’s Transplantation System","authors":"J. Miggelbrink, F. Meyer","doi":"10.1080/14650045.2022.2078705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT More than 25 years after Dayton Peace Accords (DPA), the shadows of the Yugoslav and of the subsequent construction of independent states based on ethnic division still looms over Bosnia & Hercegovina (BiH), its population, and the everyday life of people. The construction of its two major political entities – the Federation of Bosnia & Hercegovina (FBiH) and the Republika Srpska (RS) – is reflected in the health care system where it unfolds highly detrimental effects. Here, we can witness the severe impact on BiH’s ability to establish an effective system for organ donation and transplantation. Based on a series of 26 interviews with patients, patients’ organisations, clinicians and politicians BiH and its neighbours, the article identifies obstacles in clinical practices, post-Dayton bureaucracy as well as mistrust and corruption as major themes articulated by our respondents, ultimately imprisoning them in a Post-Dayton paralysis. Desperation amid the deadlocked structural conditions and contemplating alternatives ways of getting access to transplantation seem logical outcomes of a system widely regarded as deficient. This exemplifies the prosaic legacies of wars and the fragile state of BiH’s politico-administrative system.","PeriodicalId":47839,"journal":{"name":"Geopolitics","volume":"28 1","pages":"1562 - 1588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2078705","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT More than 25 years after Dayton Peace Accords (DPA), the shadows of the Yugoslav and of the subsequent construction of independent states based on ethnic division still looms over Bosnia & Hercegovina (BiH), its population, and the everyday life of people. The construction of its two major political entities – the Federation of Bosnia & Hercegovina (FBiH) and the Republika Srpska (RS) – is reflected in the health care system where it unfolds highly detrimental effects. Here, we can witness the severe impact on BiH’s ability to establish an effective system for organ donation and transplantation. Based on a series of 26 interviews with patients, patients’ organisations, clinicians and politicians BiH and its neighbours, the article identifies obstacles in clinical practices, post-Dayton bureaucracy as well as mistrust and corruption as major themes articulated by our respondents, ultimately imprisoning them in a Post-Dayton paralysis. Desperation amid the deadlocked structural conditions and contemplating alternatives ways of getting access to transplantation seem logical outcomes of a system widely regarded as deficient. This exemplifies the prosaic legacies of wars and the fragile state of BiH’s politico-administrative system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地缘政治、瘫痪与卫生政策——兼论《代顿和平协定》对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那移植系统的影响
摘要《代顿和平协议》(DPA)签署25年多后,南斯拉夫及其后建立的基于种族分裂的独立国家的阴影仍然笼罩着波黑、波黑人口和人民的日常生活。其两个主要政治实体——波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那联邦(FBiH)和塞族共和国(RS)——的建设反映在医疗保健系统中,在那里它产生了非常有害的影响。在这里,我们可以看到波黑建立有效器官捐献和移植系统的能力受到严重影响。这篇文章基于对患者、患者组织、临床医生和政治家波黑及其邻国的26次采访,将临床实践中的障碍、后代顿官僚作风以及不信任和腐败确定为我们的受访者所阐述的主要主题,最终使他们陷入后代顿瘫痪。在陷入僵局的结构条件下绝望,并考虑获得移植的替代方法,似乎是一个被广泛认为有缺陷的系统的合乎逻辑的结果。这体现了战争的平淡遗产和波黑政治行政系统的脆弱状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geopolitics
Geopolitics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The study of geopolitics has undergone a major renaissance during the past decade. Addressing a gap in the published periodical literature, this journal seeks to explore the theoretical implications of contemporary geopolitics and geopolitical change with particular reference to territorial problems and issues of state sovereignty . Multidisciplinary in its scope, Geopolitics includes all aspects of the social sciences with particular emphasis on political geography, international relations, the territorial aspects of political science and international law. The journal seeks to maintain a healthy balance between systemic and regional analysis.
期刊最新文献
From ‘Territorial Peace’ to ‘Total Peace’ in Colombia: A Geopolitical Balance Between ‘ Trochas ’, Orphans and Mourning: Migrant Mobilities and the Effects of US ‘Soft’ Remote Control in Ecuador Regionalism and Alliances in the Middle East, 2011-2021: From a “Flash in the Pan” of Regional Cooperation to Liquid Alliances Veterans, Families and the Domestic Geopolitics of Remembering War Entangled Vulnerabilities: Gendered and Racialised Bodies and Borders in EU External Border Security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1