Is it a Tenebrae Moment Again?: On Crisis in Liturgical Theology as an Opportunity for Renewal

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Liturgy Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154519
Kristine Suna-Koro
{"title":"Is it a Tenebrae Moment Again?: On Crisis in Liturgical Theology as an Opportunity for Renewal","authors":"Kristine Suna-Koro","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The language of crisis in liturgical theology and practice in the Western context is not a mere figure of speech. In the second decade of the twenty-first century enormous contradictions and fissures permeate all terrains of life. The late postmodern fragmentation of reality, veracity, and common experience is reaching hyperbolized dimensions—a hypermodernity of fragmentation and inequality. At the same time, a broad range of postcolonial and decolonial currents insistently unveil the metastasizing persistence of the coloniality of being, power, knowledge, and feeling. For liturgical theology and practices of worship in the West, this global entanglement of crosscurrents plays out not only during the present-day geriatric phase of Christendom (as a distinct religio-political regime) but also during a gradually solidifying moment of “after” Christianity (as a self-evident religio-cultural regime). In this context, we can ask whether liturgical theology is experiencing (yet another) Tenebrae moment, another moment of anxious twilight–a crisis? If so, as Nicholas Denysenko has recently argued, then we still need to ask: Whose crisis it is really? In the North American—and more broadly, Western—context, what currents are churning up trouble in the pews and for the practice of liturgical theology? Most importantly, what avenues might liturgical theologians discern as vital for thinking through this crisis? I believe that every crisis can be an apocalyptic, revelatory, and potentially transformative gateway toward more vibrant worship and more life-giving theological endeavors.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The language of crisis in liturgical theology and practice in the Western context is not a mere figure of speech. In the second decade of the twenty-first century enormous contradictions and fissures permeate all terrains of life. The late postmodern fragmentation of reality, veracity, and common experience is reaching hyperbolized dimensions—a hypermodernity of fragmentation and inequality. At the same time, a broad range of postcolonial and decolonial currents insistently unveil the metastasizing persistence of the coloniality of being, power, knowledge, and feeling. For liturgical theology and practices of worship in the West, this global entanglement of crosscurrents plays out not only during the present-day geriatric phase of Christendom (as a distinct religio-political regime) but also during a gradually solidifying moment of “after” Christianity (as a self-evident religio-cultural regime). In this context, we can ask whether liturgical theology is experiencing (yet another) Tenebrae moment, another moment of anxious twilight–a crisis? If so, as Nicholas Denysenko has recently argued, then we still need to ask: Whose crisis it is really? In the North American—and more broadly, Western—context, what currents are churning up trouble in the pews and for the practice of liturgical theology? Most importantly, what avenues might liturgical theologians discern as vital for thinking through this crisis? I believe that every crisis can be an apocalyptic, revelatory, and potentially transformative gateway toward more vibrant worship and more life-giving theological endeavors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这又是一个黑暗时刻吗?论礼仪神学的危机是更新的机会
在西方语境中,礼仪神学和实践中的危机语言不仅仅是一种修辞手法。在二十一世纪的第二个十年里,巨大的矛盾和裂痕渗透到生活的各个方面。后现代后期对现实、真实性和共同经验的碎片化正在达到夸张的程度——一种碎片化和不平等的超现代性。与此同时,广泛的后殖民和去殖民潮流不断地揭示了存在、权力、知识和情感的殖民性的转移性。对于西方的礼拜神学和礼拜实践来说,这种全球性的纠葛不仅在当今基督教世界的老年阶段(作为一种独特的宗教-政治制度),而且在“后”基督教(作为一种不言而喻的宗教-文化制度)逐渐固化的时刻发挥作用。在这种情况下,我们可以问礼仪神学是否正在经历(又一个)tenbrae时刻,另一个焦虑的黄昏时刻——危机?如果是这样,正如尼古拉斯•丹尼申科(Nicholas Denysenko)最近所指出的那样,那么我们仍然需要问:这场危机到底是谁的?在北美,更广泛地说,在西方的背景下,是什么潮流在长凳和礼仪神学的实践中制造麻烦?最重要的是,礼仪神学家认为哪些途径对于思考这场危机至关重要?我相信每一次危机都是启示性的、启示性的、潜在的变革之门,通向更有活力的敬拜和更赋予生命的神学努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Taizé: Brand or Anti-Brand? UnMute Yourself: Musings on the Obstacles of Worship’s Impact on Ethics When a Brand is Tainted: The Ethics of Song Selection in Corporate Worship “What Is Not Assumed Is Not Redeemed”: Worship Lifestyle Branding at Bethel Church UnMute Yourself: Surfing the Synthesis of the Academic and Pastoral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1