Design and Validation of Professional Spiritual Health Questionnaire for Professors (Soft War Officers)

Q3 Medicine Journal of Military Medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI:10.30491/JMM.22.12.1209
M. Asadzandi, Leila Lotfian, Seyed Majid Hosseini, Hasan Abolghasemi
{"title":"Design and Validation of Professional Spiritual Health Questionnaire for Professors (Soft War Officers)","authors":"M. Asadzandi, Leila Lotfian, Seyed Majid Hosseini, Hasan Abolghasemi","doi":"10.30491/JMM.22.12.1209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Assessing the spiritual health of professors (soft war officers) is essential to deepen the spirituality of the university environment and counteract cultural invasion. The professional spiritual health assessment should be done without measuring religiosity and inquisition. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a self-assessment questionnaire for the professional spiritual health of professors (soft war officers). Methods: This was a sequential exploratory study of instrument making. Data were collected in sequential chronological order. In the results interpretation part, data correlation was performed. In qualitative phase using the concept analysis method of Schwartz and Kim hybrid model with deductive/inductive analysis approach was done in three stages: a theoretical review of religious and scientific evidence, fieldwork with in-depth individual interviews and discussion in focus groups, final data analysis based on \"Contractual Content Analysis Method\", the initial version of the questionnaire was developed in the form of 73 initial measurable items. To determine the validity of the questionnaire, face validity, qualitative and quantitative content (CVR and CVI), structural validity, to determine reliability of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and stability were performed. Results: The CVR score in 67 items was higher than the Lewsheh table number (0.33). Five items without the required score were removed from the questionnaire. The results of CVI calculation showed that all items received a CVI score higher than 0.79. The final questionnaire had 67 items. The results of exploratory factor analysis showed the existence of a 7-factor model (model of spirituality, courage, kindness, wisdom, modesty, self-respect, justice) in the structure of items. Internal consistency of the questionnaire (with Cronbach's alpha of 0.9) showed that all items had a high correlation and were significant at the level of p <0.05. Conclusion: Using this questionnaire allows professors (soft war officers) to examine professional spiritual distress and diagnose spiritual problems. The use of spiritual care guidelines, daily self-calculation, enables cultivation so that they, in the position of spiritual mentors, can achieve the Islamization of the university and the fight against soft war.","PeriodicalId":16394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.22.12.1209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Assessing the spiritual health of professors (soft war officers) is essential to deepen the spirituality of the university environment and counteract cultural invasion. The professional spiritual health assessment should be done without measuring religiosity and inquisition. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a self-assessment questionnaire for the professional spiritual health of professors (soft war officers). Methods: This was a sequential exploratory study of instrument making. Data were collected in sequential chronological order. In the results interpretation part, data correlation was performed. In qualitative phase using the concept analysis method of Schwartz and Kim hybrid model with deductive/inductive analysis approach was done in three stages: a theoretical review of religious and scientific evidence, fieldwork with in-depth individual interviews and discussion in focus groups, final data analysis based on "Contractual Content Analysis Method", the initial version of the questionnaire was developed in the form of 73 initial measurable items. To determine the validity of the questionnaire, face validity, qualitative and quantitative content (CVR and CVI), structural validity, to determine reliability of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and stability were performed. Results: The CVR score in 67 items was higher than the Lewsheh table number (0.33). Five items without the required score were removed from the questionnaire. The results of CVI calculation showed that all items received a CVI score higher than 0.79. The final questionnaire had 67 items. The results of exploratory factor analysis showed the existence of a 7-factor model (model of spirituality, courage, kindness, wisdom, modesty, self-respect, justice) in the structure of items. Internal consistency of the questionnaire (with Cronbach's alpha of 0.9) showed that all items had a high correlation and were significant at the level of p <0.05. Conclusion: Using this questionnaire allows professors (soft war officers) to examine professional spiritual distress and diagnose spiritual problems. The use of spiritual care guidelines, daily self-calculation, enables cultivation so that they, in the position of spiritual mentors, can achieve the Islamization of the university and the fight against soft war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教授(软战军官)职业精神健康问卷的设计与验证
背景和目的:评估教授(软战争军官)的精神健康对于深化大学环境的精神性和抵制文化入侵至关重要。专业的精神健康评估应该在不测量宗教信仰和宗教调查的情况下进行。本研究旨在设计并验证教授(软战军官)职业精神健康自评问卷。方法:本研究是一项关于仪器制作的连续探索性研究。数据按时间顺序收集。在结果解释部分,进行了数据关联。在定性阶段,使用Schwartz和Kim混合模型的概念分析方法和演绎/归纳分析方法分三个阶段进行:宗教和科学证据的理论回顾、深入的个人访谈和焦点小组讨论的实地调查、基于“合同内容分析法”的最终数据分析,调查问卷的初始版本是以73个初始可测量项目的形式编制的。为了确定问卷的有效性,进行了面孔有效性、定性和定量内容(CVR和CVI)、结构有效性、确定内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha)和稳定性的可靠性。结果:67个项目的CVR得分高于Lewsheh表数(0.33)。从问卷中删除了5个没有要求得分的项目。CVI计算结果显示,所有项目的CVI得分均高于0.79。最后的问卷共有67项。探索性因素分析结果表明,在项目结构中存在一个7因素模型(精神、勇气、善良、智慧、谦逊、自尊、正义的模型)。问卷的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha为0.9)表明,所有项目都具有高度相关性,并且在p<0.05的水平上具有显著性。结论:使用该问卷可以让教授(软战军官)审视职业精神困境,诊断精神问题。精神关怀指导方针的使用,日常的自我计算,使他们能够在精神导师的位置上进行培养,从而实现大学的伊斯兰化和对抗软战争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Military Medicine
Journal of Military Medicine Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Military Medicine is a Bimonthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering research and developments in the field of health and medicine in military and crisis settings. The journal was established in 1999. It publishes original research reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Need for Tele-Mental Health of Veterans during the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic (COVID-19) Comparing the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Strategic Purchasing of Medicines in the Iran Armed Forces Health Insurance Organization Review the Psychometric Properties of Iranian Version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI) in the Military Personnel and Compilation of Polygraph Scale for It مطالعه توصیفی آمادگی جسمانی در رزم در نیروهای رسته پیاده یک مرکز نظامی در سال 1397
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1