Naar een diachrone blik op de verdiensten van Nederlandstalige auteurs

Q3 Arts and Humanities Nederlandse Letterkunde Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.5117/nedlet2020.1.002.slei
R. Sleiderink, H. V. D. Braber, N. Geerdink, L. Ham
{"title":"Naar een diachrone blik op de verdiensten van Nederlandstalige auteurs","authors":"R. Sleiderink, H. V. D. Braber, N. Geerdink, L. Ham","doi":"10.5117/nedlet2020.1.002.slei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article argues that it is both important and viable to develop a diachronic perspective on the profits of literary authors in the Low Countries. Up to now, conceptual and theoretical boundaries between different subdisciplines within Dutch literary studies have resulted in a compartmentalized, fragmentary narrative of the economic, social and symbolic profits of literary authors throughout the centuries. On the basis of a survey of the theoretical frameworks dominant in the subdisciplines of medieval, early modern and modern Dutch literature, we highlight the opportunities and difficulties for a diachronic perspective on financial advancement, focusing both on practice and discourse. In addition, we propose a schematic model that tries to overcome the difficulties and enables us to profit from the opportunities. This proposal allows for a sharper focus on both the practice of and discourse on literary authors’ economic gain from a diachronic perspective.","PeriodicalId":39266,"journal":{"name":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlandse Letterkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/nedlet2020.1.002.slei","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that it is both important and viable to develop a diachronic perspective on the profits of literary authors in the Low Countries. Up to now, conceptual and theoretical boundaries between different subdisciplines within Dutch literary studies have resulted in a compartmentalized, fragmentary narrative of the economic, social and symbolic profits of literary authors throughout the centuries. On the basis of a survey of the theoretical frameworks dominant in the subdisciplines of medieval, early modern and modern Dutch literature, we highlight the opportunities and difficulties for a diachronic perspective on financial advancement, focusing both on practice and discourse. In addition, we propose a schematic model that tries to overcome the difficulties and enables us to profit from the opportunities. This proposal allows for a sharper focus on both the practice of and discourse on literary authors’ economic gain from a diachronic perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从历时的角度审视荷兰语作家的优点
本文认为,从历时的角度考察低地文学作家的利益,既重要又可行。到目前为止,荷兰文学研究中不同分支学科之间的概念和理论边界导致了对几个世纪以来文学作者的经济、社会和象征利益的划分和零碎叙述。在对中世纪、现代早期和现代荷兰文学分支学科中占主导地位的理论框架进行调查的基础上,我们强调了从历时视角看待金融进步的机会和困难,既关注实践,也关注话语。此外,我们提出了一个试图克服困难并使我们能够从机会中获利的示意模型。这一建议允许从历时的角度更加关注文学作家经济利益的实践和话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlandse Letterkunde
Nederlandse Letterkunde Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Wat maakt elektronische literatuur (niet) toegankelijk? Aandacht voor irrelevantie. Voskuils Het Bureau als proto-databankroman Van oude mannen en de dames die erbij staan. De liefdesopvattingen van de Rose-Cassamus Een goddelijke braakbal. Maxim Februari’s Klont en de esthetiek van dataficering De verbeelding van het internet in de Nederlandse literatuur van de jaren negentig
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1