‘All those Rocks….were Talking to Each Other’: Three Scenes of Archaeologists at Work

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Norwegian Archaeological Review Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00293652.2019.1705890
S. Jackson, Joshua C. Wright, L. A. Brown
{"title":"‘All those Rocks….were Talking to Each Other’: Three Scenes of Archaeologists at Work","authors":"S. Jackson, Joshua C. Wright, L. A. Brown","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2019.1705890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are very appreciative of Patricia McAnany’s and Sarah Newman’s responses to our article. Their thoughtful comments challenge us to clarify and extend our thinking on this topic. Additionally, the meaningful intersections between our work and McAnany’s and Newman’s significant research contributions to the field of Maya studies point towards several important areas that need to be grappled with further. In our reply, we focus on three thematic areas, while also incorporating specific responses to some (though, for reasons of space, not all) of the comments and critiques raised by McAnany and Newman. We organize our response around three vignettes. These brief scenes provide openings for discussion of issues raised by the commenters, related to three questions: Are we ‘countermapping’ in the sense that it is widely understood? To what extent does our undertaking successfully frame dynamic, relational, or multiple knowledge in productive, non-binary ways? And, how do we position the impact of this work, and, in particular, our methodological choices? 1. WHAT ARE WE DOING?","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"144 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00293652.2019.1705890","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2019.1705890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are very appreciative of Patricia McAnany’s and Sarah Newman’s responses to our article. Their thoughtful comments challenge us to clarify and extend our thinking on this topic. Additionally, the meaningful intersections between our work and McAnany’s and Newman’s significant research contributions to the field of Maya studies point towards several important areas that need to be grappled with further. In our reply, we focus on three thematic areas, while also incorporating specific responses to some (though, for reasons of space, not all) of the comments and critiques raised by McAnany and Newman. We organize our response around three vignettes. These brief scenes provide openings for discussion of issues raised by the commenters, related to three questions: Are we ‘countermapping’ in the sense that it is widely understood? To what extent does our undertaking successfully frame dynamic, relational, or multiple knowledge in productive, non-binary ways? And, how do we position the impact of this work, and, in particular, our methodological choices? 1. WHAT ARE WE DOING?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“所有的岩石....“我们在互相交谈”:考古学家在工作的三个场景
我们非常感谢Patricia McAnany和Sarah Newman对我们文章的回应。他们深思熟虑的评论要求我们澄清和扩展我们对这一主题的思考。此外,我们的工作与McAnany和Newman对玛雅研究领域的重大研究贡献之间的有意义的交叉点指向了几个需要进一步解决的重要领域。在我们的答复中,我们侧重于三个主题领域,同时也纳入了对McAnany和Newman提出的一些评论和批评的具体回应(尽管出于篇幅原因,并非全部)。我们围绕三个小插曲来组织我们的回应。这些简短的场景为评论人士提出的问题提供了讨论的机会,涉及三个问题:我们是否在被广泛理解的意义上“反映射”?我们的事业在多大程度上成功地以生产性、非二元的方式构建了动态、关系或多重知识?我们如何定位这项工作的影响,特别是我们的方法选择?1.我们在做什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Norwegian Archaeological Review published since 1968, aims to be an interface between archaeological research in the Nordic countries and global archaeological trends, a meeting ground for current discussion of theoretical and methodical problems on an international scientific level. The main focus is on the European area, but discussions based upon results from other parts of the world are also welcomed. The comments of specialists, along with the author"s reply, are given as an addendum to selected articles. The Journal is also receptive to uninvited opinions and comments on a wider scope of archaeological themes, e.g. articles in Norwegian Archaeological Review or other journals, monographies, conferences.
期刊最新文献
Evidence of Large Vessels and Sail in Bronze Age Scandinavia Contrasts of the Nordic Bronze Age: Essays in Honour of Christopher Prescott Freunde und Feinde – Dania Slavica: Grenzegebiete und Grenzlinien in der Küstenlandschaft auf Sudseeland, Lolland, Falster und Møn in der Wikingerzeit und Hochmittelalter Here and Now: Towards an Experiential Archaeological Fieldwork First Farmers on the Island of Bornholm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1