Seismic fault identification in coal mines based on SOM–GWO–SVM algorithm

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1190/int-2023-0025.1
Yufei Gong, Chenyang Zhu, Guowei Zhu, Lei Zhang, Guangui Zou
{"title":"Seismic fault identification in coal mines based on SOM–GWO–SVM algorithm","authors":"Yufei Gong, Chenyang Zhu, Guowei Zhu, Lei Zhang, Guangui Zou","doi":"10.1190/int-2023-0025.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate fault identification in coal mines is important to improve mine safety and economic benefits. We compared various intelligent algorithms for data pre-processing and optimisation, and analysed the construction methods of seismic attribute datasets and the performance of intelligent optimisation algorithms using fault identification accuracy as the discrimination index to find a better combined model for seismic fault identification. First, the training dataset is constructed by mining the fault and non-fault information revealed by the roadway. The distribution characteristics of the seismic attribute data show similarities among them, and they are non-linearly separable. Directly using the attributes to construct the dataset, the accuracy of fault identification using the support vector machine model was 78.41%. Principal Component Analysis and Self-Organising Mapping Neural Network were used to extract effective information, and then combined with the SVM classification model, the accuracy of fault identification was 83.82% and 87.47%, respectively. Compared with the original data and PCA dimensionality reduction data, the accuracy of fault detection is improved by 9.06% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that SOM can effectively improve the accuracy of fault detection by eliminating similar attributes and reducing the weight of redundant information. Then, through fixed attribute data set, Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization and Grey Wolf Optimizer intelligent optimization algorithms were used to find the optimal kernel function parameter and penalty parameter of SVM classifier, the accuracy rate of SOM-GWO-SVM model reached 91.12%, compared with SOM-PSO-SVM and SOM-GA-SVM, the model accuracy is increased by 5.2% and 5.61%, respectively. Compared with PSO and GA, the GWO algorithm has a better global search ability. The identification result of the SOM-GWO-SVM model is closest to the actual fault exposure, especially for the identification of \"short\" faults and associated faults, which has obvious advantages over the traditional manual interpretation in terms of efficiency and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":51318,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2023-0025.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate fault identification in coal mines is important to improve mine safety and economic benefits. We compared various intelligent algorithms for data pre-processing and optimisation, and analysed the construction methods of seismic attribute datasets and the performance of intelligent optimisation algorithms using fault identification accuracy as the discrimination index to find a better combined model for seismic fault identification. First, the training dataset is constructed by mining the fault and non-fault information revealed by the roadway. The distribution characteristics of the seismic attribute data show similarities among them, and they are non-linearly separable. Directly using the attributes to construct the dataset, the accuracy of fault identification using the support vector machine model was 78.41%. Principal Component Analysis and Self-Organising Mapping Neural Network were used to extract effective information, and then combined with the SVM classification model, the accuracy of fault identification was 83.82% and 87.47%, respectively. Compared with the original data and PCA dimensionality reduction data, the accuracy of fault detection is improved by 9.06% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that SOM can effectively improve the accuracy of fault detection by eliminating similar attributes and reducing the weight of redundant information. Then, through fixed attribute data set, Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization and Grey Wolf Optimizer intelligent optimization algorithms were used to find the optimal kernel function parameter and penalty parameter of SVM classifier, the accuracy rate of SOM-GWO-SVM model reached 91.12%, compared with SOM-PSO-SVM and SOM-GA-SVM, the model accuracy is increased by 5.2% and 5.61%, respectively. Compared with PSO and GA, the GWO algorithm has a better global search ability. The identification result of the SOM-GWO-SVM model is closest to the actual fault exposure, especially for the identification of "short" faults and associated faults, which has obvious advantages over the traditional manual interpretation in terms of efficiency and accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于SOM - GWO - SVM算法的煤矿地震断层识别
煤矿断层的准确识别对提高煤矿安全和经济效益具有重要意义。比较了各种数据预处理和优化的智能算法,并以故障识别精度为判别指标,分析了地震属性数据集的构建方法和智能优化算法的性能,寻找更好的地震故障识别组合模型。首先,通过挖掘巷道显示的故障信息和非故障信息构建训练数据集;地震属性数据的分布特征具有相似性,且具有非线性可分性。直接使用属性构建数据集,使用支持向量机模型进行故障识别的准确率为78.41%。利用主成分分析和自组织映射神经网络提取有效信息,结合支持向量机分类模型,故障识别准确率分别为83.82%和87.47%。与原始数据和PCA降维数据相比,故障检测的准确率分别提高了9.06%和3.66%,表明SOM可以通过消除相似属性和降低冗余信息的权重有效提高故障检测的准确率。然后,通过固定属性数据集,采用遗传算法、粒子群优化算法和灰狼优化算法寻找SVM分类器的最优核函数参数和惩罚参数,SOM-GWO-SVM模型准确率达到91.12%,与SOM-PSO-SVM和SOM-GA-SVM相比,模型准确率分别提高了5.2%和5.61%。与粒子群算法和遗传算法相比,GWO算法具有更好的全局搜索能力。SOM-GWO-SVM模型的识别结果最接近实际故障暴露,特别是对“短”故障和关联故障的识别,在效率和精度上都比传统人工解译有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ***Jointly published by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG)*** Interpretation is a new, peer-reviewed journal for advancing the practice of subsurface interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Seismic resolution enhancement with variational modal based fast matching pursuit decomposition The Lower Silurian Longmaxi rapid-transgressive black shale and organic matter distribution on the Upper Yangtze Platform, China Machine Learning Application to Assess Occurrence and Saturations of Methane Hydrate in Marine Deposits Offshore India Mary Magdalene: A Visual History Women in John’s Gospel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1