A Usability Evaluation of Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA): Examining the Impact of Learner Differences in Pedagogical Usability

Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442
Rong Tang, Zhan Hu, Nicole Henry, Ashley Thomas
{"title":"A Usability Evaluation of Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA): Examining the Impact of Learner Differences in Pedagogical Usability","authors":"Rong Tang, Zhan Hu, Nicole Henry, Ashley Thomas","doi":"10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper reports the results of a usability and user experience (UX) investigation into the Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA) course site, a free online learning platform developed through community effort. Remote synchronous usability test sessions were run with 42 participants. Participants completed a pre-session interview, performed tasks related to the course orientation unit and two content units, and filled out a post-session questionnaire. Significant differences were found among people with different demographic attributes, educational backgrounds, occupations, and levels of research data management (RDM) training, in areas related to self-rating, task performance, and post-task and post-session evaluations of RDMLA. Significant correlations occurred among participants’ pre-session, post-task, and post-session ratings, as well as performance measures. Qualitative descriptions of the participants’ perceptions of the future of RDM in LIS were also reported. The study results indicate a need to add a new criterion - diverse learner population - into the framework of pedagogical usability.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports the results of a usability and user experience (UX) investigation into the Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA) course site, a free online learning platform developed through community effort. Remote synchronous usability test sessions were run with 42 participants. Participants completed a pre-session interview, performed tasks related to the course orientation unit and two content units, and filled out a post-session questionnaire. Significant differences were found among people with different demographic attributes, educational backgrounds, occupations, and levels of research data management (RDM) training, in areas related to self-rating, task performance, and post-task and post-session evaluations of RDMLA. Significant correlations occurred among participants’ pre-session, post-task, and post-session ratings, as well as performance measures. Qualitative descriptions of the participants’ perceptions of the future of RDM in LIS were also reported. The study results indicate a need to add a new criterion - diverse learner population - into the framework of pedagogical usability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
研究数据管理馆员学院(RDMLA)的可用性评估:考察学习者差异对教学可用性的影响
摘要本文报告了研究数据管理图书馆员学院(RDMLA)课程网站的可用性和用户体验(UX)调查结果,RDMLA是一个通过社区努力开发的免费在线学习平台。远程同步可用性测试会话由42名参与者进行。参与者完成了一次会前访谈,完成了与课程定位单元和两个内容单元相关的任务,并填写了一份会后问卷。不同人口统计属性、教育背景、职业和RDM培训水平的人群在RDM自评、任务绩效、任务后和会话后评价等方面存在显著差异。参与者在会议前、任务后和会议后的评分以及表现指标之间存在显著的相关性。还报告了参与者对LIS中RDM未来的看法的定性描述。研究结果表明,有必要在教学可用性的框架中增加一个新的标准——多样化的学习者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1