Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Response Times and Fixation Counts: Providing Comprehensive Feedback and Accurate Diagnosis

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI:10.3102/10769986221111085
P. Zhan, K. Man, Stefanie A. Wind, Jonathan Malone
{"title":"Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Response Times and Fixation Counts: Providing Comprehensive Feedback and Accurate Diagnosis","authors":"P. Zhan, K. Man, Stefanie A. Wind, Jonathan Malone","doi":"10.3102/10769986221111085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respondents’ problem-solving behaviors comprise behaviors that represent complicated cognitive processes that are frequently systematically tied to one another. Biometric data, such as visual fixation counts (FCs), which are an important eye-tracking indicator, can be combined with other types of variables that reflect different aspects of problem-solving behavior to quantify variability in problem-solving behavior. To provide comprehensive feedback and accurate diagnosis when using such multimodal data, the present study proposes a multimodal joint cognitive diagnosis model that accounts for latent attributes, latent ability, processing speed, and visual engagement by simultaneously modeling response accuracy (RA), response times, and FCs. We used two simulation studies to test the feasibility of the proposed model. Findings mainly suggest that the parameters of the proposed model can be well recovered and that modeling FCs, in addition to RA and response times, could increase the comprehensiveness of feedback on problem-solving-related cognitive characteristics as well as the accuracy of knowledge structure diagnosis. An empirical example is used to demonstrate the applicability and benefits of the proposed model. We discuss the implications of our findings as they relate to research and practice.","PeriodicalId":48001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","volume":"47 1","pages":"736 - 776"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986221111085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Respondents’ problem-solving behaviors comprise behaviors that represent complicated cognitive processes that are frequently systematically tied to one another. Biometric data, such as visual fixation counts (FCs), which are an important eye-tracking indicator, can be combined with other types of variables that reflect different aspects of problem-solving behavior to quantify variability in problem-solving behavior. To provide comprehensive feedback and accurate diagnosis when using such multimodal data, the present study proposes a multimodal joint cognitive diagnosis model that accounts for latent attributes, latent ability, processing speed, and visual engagement by simultaneously modeling response accuracy (RA), response times, and FCs. We used two simulation studies to test the feasibility of the proposed model. Findings mainly suggest that the parameters of the proposed model can be well recovered and that modeling FCs, in addition to RA and response times, could increase the comprehensiveness of feedback on problem-solving-related cognitive characteristics as well as the accuracy of knowledge structure diagnosis. An empirical example is used to demonstrate the applicability and benefits of the proposed model. We discuss the implications of our findings as they relate to research and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合反应时间和注视次数的认知诊断模型:提供全面反馈和准确诊断
受访者解决问题的行为包括代表复杂认知过程的行为,这些认知过程经常系统地相互联系。生物特征数据,如视觉注视计数(FC),这是一个重要的眼睛跟踪指标,可以与反映解决问题行为不同方面的其他类型的变量相结合,以量化解决问题行为的可变性。为了在使用这种多模式数据时提供全面的反馈和准确的诊断,本研究提出了一种多模式联合认知诊断模型,该模型通过同时建模反应准确性(RA)、反应时间和FC来考虑潜在属性、潜在能力、处理速度和视觉参与。我们使用了两个模拟研究来测试所提出的模型的可行性。研究结果主要表明,所提出的模型的参数可以很好地恢复,建模FC,除了RA和响应时间外,还可以提高对问题解决相关认知特征的反馈的全面性以及知识结构诊断的准确性。通过实例验证了该模型的适用性和优点。我们讨论了我们的发现对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, sponsored jointly by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, publishes articles that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also of interest. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority. The Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics provides an outlet for papers that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis, provide properties of these methods, and an example of use in education or behavioral research. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also sometimes accepted. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority.
期刊最新文献
Improving Balance in Educational Measurement: A Legacy of E. F. Lindquist A Simple Technique Assessing Ordinal and Disordinal Interaction Effects A Comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation in Educational Measurement Sample Size Calculation and Optimal Design for Multivariate Regression-Based Norming Corrigendum to Power Approximations for Overall Average Effects in Meta-Analysis With Dependent Effect Sizes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1