Sensitivity and Specificity of a Short Questionnaire to Screen Frailty in the Community-Dwelling Older Population

Pub Date : 2018-05-31 DOI:10.4236/aar.2018.73005
A. Capanna, P. Scarcella, F. Gilardi, S. Mancinelli, L. Palombi, M. Marazzi, F. Riccardi, G. Liotta
{"title":"Sensitivity and Specificity of a Short Questionnaire to Screen Frailty in the Community-Dwelling Older Population","authors":"A. Capanna, P. Scarcella, F. Gilardi, S. Mancinelli, L. Palombi, M. Marazzi, F. Riccardi, G. Liotta","doi":"10.4236/aar.2018.73005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Frailty represents a major risk factor for death and Use of Hospital Services (UHS) among older adults. A simple tool to detect frailty might permit stratification of the community-dwelling older population according to the risk of negative outcomes. The present study aims at determining the sensitivity and specificity in predicting mortality and UHS of the Short Functional Geriatric Evaluation (SFGE), a short questionnaire to screen for frailty in community-dwelling older citizens. Methods. The study is a secondary analysis of all the data collected through an observational longitudinal cohort study carried out in Lazio region (Italy). The SFGE is compared with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation (FGE) questionnaire to define sensitivity and specificity for mortality and for UHS during the first year following its administration. Results. The SFGE classifies 36.3% of the respondents as frail and shows a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 78.3% compared to the FGE (area under the ROC: 0.928; CL95%: 0.910 - 0.947; p-value < 0.001). Those respondents identified by the SFGE as frail also include some of those classified by the FGE as pre-frail, who also show a high rate of UHS. The results show that the SFGE score predicts the UHS more accurately than it does the mortality rate. Conclusion. The SFGE identifies as frail a larger portion of the enrolled population than the FGE. Those people so identified show a high rate of UHS. Because of its easy and quick administration, it can be considered a useful primary screening tool but it must be followed up with a more extensive assessment of those identified as frail. The small time needed to fill in the tool and the possibility of administering it by telephone makes the SFGE a useful tool to screen for frailty and to plan the provision of care services at both individual and population level.","PeriodicalId":90413,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"07 1","pages":"52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/aar.2018.73005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction. Frailty represents a major risk factor for death and Use of Hospital Services (UHS) among older adults. A simple tool to detect frailty might permit stratification of the community-dwelling older population according to the risk of negative outcomes. The present study aims at determining the sensitivity and specificity in predicting mortality and UHS of the Short Functional Geriatric Evaluation (SFGE), a short questionnaire to screen for frailty in community-dwelling older citizens. Methods. The study is a secondary analysis of all the data collected through an observational longitudinal cohort study carried out in Lazio region (Italy). The SFGE is compared with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation (FGE) questionnaire to define sensitivity and specificity for mortality and for UHS during the first year following its administration. Results. The SFGE classifies 36.3% of the respondents as frail and shows a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 78.3% compared to the FGE (area under the ROC: 0.928; CL95%: 0.910 - 0.947; p-value < 0.001). Those respondents identified by the SFGE as frail also include some of those classified by the FGE as pre-frail, who also show a high rate of UHS. The results show that the SFGE score predicts the UHS more accurately than it does the mortality rate. Conclusion. The SFGE identifies as frail a larger portion of the enrolled population than the FGE. Those people so identified show a high rate of UHS. Because of its easy and quick administration, it can be considered a useful primary screening tool but it must be followed up with a more extensive assessment of those identified as frail. The small time needed to fill in the tool and the possibility of administering it by telephone makes the SFGE a useful tool to screen for frailty and to plan the provision of care services at both individual and population level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一份简短问卷对社区居住老年人群虚弱筛查的敏感性和特异性
介绍虚弱是老年人死亡和使用医院服务(UHS)的主要风险因素。一个检测虚弱的简单工具可能会根据负面结果的风险对居住在社区的老年人群进行分层。本研究旨在确定短期功能性老年评估(SFGE)在预测死亡率和UHS方面的敏感性和特异性,SFGE是一种筛查社区老年人虚弱程度的短期问卷。方法。该研究是对在拉齐奥地区(意大利)进行的观察性纵向队列研究收集的所有数据的二次分析。将SFGE与功能性老年评估(FGE)问卷进行比较,以确定其给药后第一年死亡率和UHS的敏感性和特异性。后果SFGE将36.3%的受访者归类为虚弱,与FGE相比,其敏感性为90.4%,特异性为78.3%(ROC下面积:0.928;CL95%:0.910-0.947;p值<0.001)。SFGE确定为虚弱的受访者还包括一些被FGE归类为前虚弱的受访者,他们也显示出高UHS发生率。结果表明,SFGE评分预测UHS比预测死亡率更准确。结论SFGE将登记人群中比FGE更大的一部分确定为体弱。这些被确认的人显示出UHS的高发病率。由于其简单快速的给药,它可以被认为是一种有用的初级筛查工具,但必须对那些被确定为虚弱的人进行更广泛的评估。填写该工具所需的时间很短,并且有可能通过电话进行管理,这使得SFGE成为一个有用的工具,可以筛查虚弱情况,并计划在个人和人群层面提供护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1