Squaring the Circle: Aesthetics and Its History

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE New Literary History Pub Date : 2021-08-12 DOI:10.1353/nlh.2021.0010
Christopher Braider
{"title":"Squaring the Circle: Aesthetics and Its History","authors":"Christopher Braider","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The following essay tries to square the circle formed by two opposing yet inextricably entangled ways of thinking about aesthetics: as a subfield of philosophy and as the product of a uniquely dateable historical event. This invites us to interrogate the relationship between philosophy and history generally, disciplines that have eyed each other with suspicion from the moment both set about professionalizing their standards and methods in Enlightenment Europe—the very moment that witnesses the advent of aesthetics itself, most notably in David Hume and Immanuel Kant. I argue that this relationship was already fully dialectical even if that idea did not come to formal self-consciousness until Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel placed it at the center of his own philosophical system. What made aesthetics loom so large in Enlightenment circles was the degree to which problems of beauty, sublimity, and taste put philosophy to the test of historical experience. But the reverse was true as well. In putting philosophy to an historical test, aesthetics opened the way for Hegel’s effort to put history to the test of philosophical reason. I hope that aesthetics will come into sharper focus when seen as both a philosophical discipline and an historical dilemma. Aesthetics’ dual status as discipline and dilemma reveals more clearly not only why it emerged when and where it did but also how the eighteenth century of Hume and Kant foreshadowed the historical, philosophical, and aesthetic program that took shape in Hegel.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"52 1","pages":"211 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The following essay tries to square the circle formed by two opposing yet inextricably entangled ways of thinking about aesthetics: as a subfield of philosophy and as the product of a uniquely dateable historical event. This invites us to interrogate the relationship between philosophy and history generally, disciplines that have eyed each other with suspicion from the moment both set about professionalizing their standards and methods in Enlightenment Europe—the very moment that witnesses the advent of aesthetics itself, most notably in David Hume and Immanuel Kant. I argue that this relationship was already fully dialectical even if that idea did not come to formal self-consciousness until Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel placed it at the center of his own philosophical system. What made aesthetics loom so large in Enlightenment circles was the degree to which problems of beauty, sublimity, and taste put philosophy to the test of historical experience. But the reverse was true as well. In putting philosophy to an historical test, aesthetics opened the way for Hegel’s effort to put history to the test of philosophical reason. I hope that aesthetics will come into sharper focus when seen as both a philosophical discipline and an historical dilemma. Aesthetics’ dual status as discipline and dilemma reveals more clearly not only why it emerged when and where it did but also how the eighteenth century of Hume and Kant foreshadowed the historical, philosophical, and aesthetic program that took shape in Hegel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圈地:美学及其历史
摘要:本文试图打破两种对立但又纠缠不清的美学思维方式所形成的困境:美学是哲学的一个分支领域,美学是一个独特的历史事件的产物。这就要求我们审视哲学与历史之间的关系,这两门学科从启蒙时代的欧洲开始将各自的标准和方法专业化的那一刻起,就以怀疑的目光相互注视着对方——这一时刻见证了美学本身的出现,最著名的是大卫·休谟和伊曼努尔·康德。我认为这种关系已经是完全辩证的,即使这个概念直到乔治·威廉·弗里德里希·黑格尔把它放在他自己的哲学体系的中心才成为正式的自我意识。美学之所以在启蒙运动的圈子里显得如此重要,是因为美、崇高和品味的问题在多大程度上使哲学经受了历史经验的考验。但反之亦然。在对哲学进行历史检验的过程中,美学为黑格尔对哲学理性进行历史检验的努力开辟了道路。我希望美学在被视为一门哲学学科和一个历史困境时,能得到更清晰的关注。美学作为学科和困境的双重地位更清楚地揭示了它出现的时间和地点,以及18世纪休谟和康德如何预示了在黑格尔那里形成的历史、哲学和美学计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Literary History
New Literary History LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
期刊最新文献
"Let me look again": The Moral Philosophy and Literature Debate at 40 Aesthetic Affairs: Art, Architecture, and the Illusion of Detachment Medieval Futures and the Postwork Romance Idols of the Fragment: Barthes and Critique Metaphorical Figures for Moral Complexity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1