Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing ozone-assisted process parameters for formaldehyde removal

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y
Amin Nemati Tamar, Mohadeseh Karbasi, Mohammad Reza Khani, Tayebeh Hamzehlouyan, Babak Shokri
{"title":"Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing ozone-assisted process parameters for formaldehyde removal","authors":"Amin Nemati Tamar,&nbsp;Mohadeseh Karbasi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Khani,&nbsp;Tayebeh Hamzehlouyan,&nbsp;Babak Shokri","doi":"10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formaldehyde, a volatile organic compound (VOC), is one of the main gaseous pollutants from commercial cooking. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a laboratory-scale ozone-assisted indirect plasma method for formaldehyde removal using response surface methodology (RSM). A dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor was used for ozone generation. Inlet HCHO concentration, ozone concentration, and residence time were considered the design parameters, and formaldehyde removal efficiency (response 1) and energy yield (response 2) were considered response parameters. The optimized models showed a positive correlation between the predicted and experimental outcomes. Inlet ozone concentration, the most significant parameter in the removal efficiency model, represented a positive correlation with this response in most parts of the operating region. The optimal point with the highest desirability (i.e., D<sub>1</sub> point) was obtained at the inlet HCHO concentration of 120 ppm, inlet ozone concentration of 40 ppm, and reaction time of 11.35 s within the parameter ranges studied, resulting in 64% removal efficiency and 2.64 g/kWh energy yield. At the point with the second highest desirability (D<sub>2</sub>), 100% removal efficiency along with 0.7 g/kWh energy yield was achieved indicating the very good performance of the process. The indirect plasma approach used in this study presented a successful performance in terms of removal efficiency along with acceptable energy yield compared to other plasma-assisted processes reported in the literature. The results suggested that ozone-assisted indirect plasma treatment can be utilized as an efficient alternative method for formaldehyde removal in commercial kitchens, while efficiency or energy yield should be prioritized for optimizing operating conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-023-00873-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formaldehyde, a volatile organic compound (VOC), is one of the main gaseous pollutants from commercial cooking. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a laboratory-scale ozone-assisted indirect plasma method for formaldehyde removal using response surface methodology (RSM). A dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor was used for ozone generation. Inlet HCHO concentration, ozone concentration, and residence time were considered the design parameters, and formaldehyde removal efficiency (response 1) and energy yield (response 2) were considered response parameters. The optimized models showed a positive correlation between the predicted and experimental outcomes. Inlet ozone concentration, the most significant parameter in the removal efficiency model, represented a positive correlation with this response in most parts of the operating region. The optimal point with the highest desirability (i.e., D1 point) was obtained at the inlet HCHO concentration of 120 ppm, inlet ozone concentration of 40 ppm, and reaction time of 11.35 s within the parameter ranges studied, resulting in 64% removal efficiency and 2.64 g/kWh energy yield. At the point with the second highest desirability (D2), 100% removal efficiency along with 0.7 g/kWh energy yield was achieved indicating the very good performance of the process. The indirect plasma approach used in this study presented a successful performance in terms of removal efficiency along with acceptable energy yield compared to other plasma-assisted processes reported in the literature. The results suggested that ozone-assisted indirect plasma treatment can be utilized as an efficient alternative method for formaldehyde removal in commercial kitchens, while efficiency or energy yield should be prioritized for optimizing operating conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响应面法优化臭氧辅助除甲醛工艺参数
甲醛是一种挥发性有机化合物(VOC),是商业烹饪中的主要气体污染物之一。本研究使用响应面法(RSM)评估了实验室规模臭氧辅助间接等离子体法去除甲醛的有效性。介质阻挡放电(DBD)反应器用于臭氧产生。入口六氯环己烷浓度、臭氧浓度和停留时间被视为设计参数,甲醛去除效率(响应1)和能量产量(响应2)被视为响应参数。优化后的模型显示预测结果与实验结果呈正相关。入口臭氧浓度是去除效率模型中最重要的参数,在操作区域的大部分区域与该响应呈正相关。在所研究的参数范围内,当入口六氯环己烷浓度为120ppm,入口臭氧浓度为40ppm,反应时间为11.35s时,获得了具有最高期望值的最佳点(即D1点),去除效率为64%,能量产率为2.64 g/kWh。在具有第二高期望值(D2)的点,实现了100%的去除效率以及0.7g/kWh的能量产率,表明该方法具有非常好的性能。与文献中报道的其他等离子体辅助工艺相比,本研究中使用的间接等离子体方法在去除效率和可接受的能量产出方面表现出了成功的性能。结果表明,臭氧辅助间接等离子体处理可以作为商业厨房除甲醛的一种有效替代方法,同时应优先考虑效率或能源产量以优化操作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: -Water pollution and treatment -Wastewater treatment and reuse -Air control -Soil remediation -Noise and radiation control -Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology -Food safety and hygiene
期刊最新文献
Polystyrene nanoplastics: optimized removal using magnetic nano-adsorbent and toxicity assessment in zebrafish embryos The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review Production of biosurfactant by Bacillus megaterieum using agro-food wastes and its application in petroleum sludge oil recovery Investigations on the surface disinfection efficacy of far-UVC 222 nm germicidal irradiance device in a controlled environment and field test Determining the optimization of seawater concentrate discharge of coastal desalination plants into the marine environment, based on numerical modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1