Atopic objects: The afterlives of gold teeth stolen from Holocaust dead

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Material Culture Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1177/1359183520954462
Z. Dziuban
{"title":"Atopic objects: The afterlives of gold teeth stolen from Holocaust dead","authors":"Z. Dziuban","doi":"10.1177/1359183520954462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transfers of property are an integral part of armed conflicts and instances of mass political violence. Not just the state and the military, but also civilians confiscate, dispossess, loot and redistribute wealth across ethnic, national, class or religious lines, in the process re-enacting and sustaining the boundaries of othering and belonging that stand behind the conflict. In this way, economic violence takes on an essentially political dimension. Although, to date, rarely conceptualized as such, even grave robbery perpetrated at the burial sites of a defeated enemy or a member of othered minority constitutes a practice of alterity and dehumanization. And while, in the aftermath of violence, this very fact has the ability to invest things taken from mass graves with a particularly disturbing potential, this article reflects on the practices and affective dynamics surrounding objects of a distinctively unsettling status: golden teeth and dental bridges in their ambivalent condition between material objects (valuables) and bodily remains of the dead. They are considered in this article through the conceptual lens of ‘atopic objects’, a notion designed to bring to the fore both the out-of-place quality and the at once as-well-as/neither-nor character of those things, suspended on the threshold between human remains and material objects, private possessions and body parts of othered and violently dispossessed people. In this article, the author asks how this uneasy ontological status is experienced, acted upon and negotiated by the new (and rarely rightful) ‘owners’ and offers an insight into the practical, affective, political and also legal framings through which ‘atopic objects’ are being constructed and reconstructed either as things or as body parts and, at the cost of their unsettling quality, become embedded in the postwar orders, both in the intimate order of the body and in the political–economic order of the state.","PeriodicalId":46892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Culture","volume":"25 1","pages":"408 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1359183520954462","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183520954462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Transfers of property are an integral part of armed conflicts and instances of mass political violence. Not just the state and the military, but also civilians confiscate, dispossess, loot and redistribute wealth across ethnic, national, class or religious lines, in the process re-enacting and sustaining the boundaries of othering and belonging that stand behind the conflict. In this way, economic violence takes on an essentially political dimension. Although, to date, rarely conceptualized as such, even grave robbery perpetrated at the burial sites of a defeated enemy or a member of othered minority constitutes a practice of alterity and dehumanization. And while, in the aftermath of violence, this very fact has the ability to invest things taken from mass graves with a particularly disturbing potential, this article reflects on the practices and affective dynamics surrounding objects of a distinctively unsettling status: golden teeth and dental bridges in their ambivalent condition between material objects (valuables) and bodily remains of the dead. They are considered in this article through the conceptual lens of ‘atopic objects’, a notion designed to bring to the fore both the out-of-place quality and the at once as-well-as/neither-nor character of those things, suspended on the threshold between human remains and material objects, private possessions and body parts of othered and violently dispossessed people. In this article, the author asks how this uneasy ontological status is experienced, acted upon and negotiated by the new (and rarely rightful) ‘owners’ and offers an insight into the practical, affective, political and also legal framings through which ‘atopic objects’ are being constructed and reconstructed either as things or as body parts and, at the cost of their unsettling quality, become embedded in the postwar orders, both in the intimate order of the body and in the political–economic order of the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特摄对象:从大屠杀死者身上偷走的金牙的后遗症
财产转让是武装冲突和大规模政治暴力事件的一个组成部分。不仅是国家和军队,平民也不分种族、民族、阶级或宗教,没收、剥夺、掠夺和重新分配财富,在这个过程中,冲突背后的“他者”和“归属感”的界限被重新制定和维持。这样,经济暴力就具有了本质上的政治维度。虽然到目前为止,很少有这样的概念,但即使是在被打败的敌人或其他少数民族成员的墓地进行的盗墓行为也构成了一种另类和非人性化的做法。虽然在暴力事件发生后,这一事实本身就有可能使从万人坑中取出的东西具有特别令人不安的潜力,但本文反映了围绕具有独特令人不安地位的物品的实践和情感动态:金牙和牙桥在物质物品(贵重物品)和死者遗体之间的矛盾状态。本文通过“特应性物品”的概念镜头来考虑它们,这一概念旨在突出这些物品的不合时宜的品质和立即以及/非或非的特征,暂停在人类遗骸和物质物品之间的门槛上,私人财产和其他暴力剥夺者的身体部位。在这篇文章中,作者询问了这种不安的本体论地位是如何被新的(很少是合法的)“所有者”体验、行动和谈判的,并提供了对实践、情感、政治和法律框架的洞察,通过这些框架,“特应对象”被构建和重建为物品或身体部位,并以其令人不安的品质为代价,嵌入战后秩序。无论是在身体的亲密秩序中,还是在国家的政治经济秩序中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Culture is an interdisciplinary journal designed to cater for the increasing interest in material culture studies. It is concerned with the relationship between artefacts and social relations irrespective of time and place and aims to systematically explore the linkage between the construction of social identities and the production and use of culture. The Journal of Material Culture transcends traditional disciplinary and cultural boundaries drawing on a wide range of disciplines including anthropology, archaeology, design studies, history, human geography, museology and ethnography.
期刊最新文献
Memory and materiality: The becoming of biographic objects after war and forced displacement. The commercial and regional imagery of big things: Establishing a foundation for the study of oversized roadside landmarks Rethinking gender from the ethnographic museum. Introduction to the special issue Straw craft, imperial education and ethnographic exhibitions as tightly braided sites of gender production in Haiti and Curaçao COVID, clay, and the digital: The role of digital media in pottery skill development during the COVID-19 pandemic in Britain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1