Supporting students’ active learning with a computer based tool

IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Active Learning in Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI:10.1177/14697874221100465
Dana Opre, C. Serban, A. Vescan, Romiță Iucu
{"title":"Supporting students’ active learning with a computer based tool","authors":"Dana Opre, C. Serban, A. Vescan, Romiță Iucu","doi":"10.1177/14697874221100465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the use of information technology to promote active learning in higher education has raised great interest. Teachers are continuously challenged to identify new research-informed approaches and educational practices for supporting students to actively learn and apply their knowledge. The present study tests the effects on students’ learning outcomes of an ad hoc developed learning tool (QLearn) which integrates three active learning strategies, previously empirically validated in face-to-face educational contexts. By using the QLearn software, students can generate questions, explain and develop answers, receive feedback from teacher and test their knowledge. Using a quasi-experimental design, we analyzed whether, in various course settings and instructional contexts, the students who use QLearn, as a support in their learning process, demonstrate a different learning performance compared to students who learn the same content by using their preferred learning strategies. The interventions were offered on a voluntary basis and implied participants from different fields (computer science, psychology) and different study levels (undergraduate and master’s level). The results showed that some groups of our participants significantly benefits from the use of QLearn platform. The outcomes of the present research advanced our understanding of the efficiency of technology-sustained learning in educational contexts and offer a promising strategy for facilitating the active involvement of students in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":47411,"journal":{"name":"Active Learning in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Active Learning in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221100465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent years, the use of information technology to promote active learning in higher education has raised great interest. Teachers are continuously challenged to identify new research-informed approaches and educational practices for supporting students to actively learn and apply their knowledge. The present study tests the effects on students’ learning outcomes of an ad hoc developed learning tool (QLearn) which integrates three active learning strategies, previously empirically validated in face-to-face educational contexts. By using the QLearn software, students can generate questions, explain and develop answers, receive feedback from teacher and test their knowledge. Using a quasi-experimental design, we analyzed whether, in various course settings and instructional contexts, the students who use QLearn, as a support in their learning process, demonstrate a different learning performance compared to students who learn the same content by using their preferred learning strategies. The interventions were offered on a voluntary basis and implied participants from different fields (computer science, psychology) and different study levels (undergraduate and master’s level). The results showed that some groups of our participants significantly benefits from the use of QLearn platform. The outcomes of the present research advanced our understanding of the efficiency of technology-sustained learning in educational contexts and offer a promising strategy for facilitating the active involvement of students in the learning process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以电脑为基础的工具支持学生的主动学习
近年来,利用信息技术促进高等教育中的主动学习引起了人们的极大兴趣。教师不断面临挑战,要确定新的基于研究的方法和教育实践,以支持学生积极学习和应用他们的知识。本研究测试了一种专门开发的学习工具(QLearn)对学生学习结果的影响,该工具集成了三种积极的学习策略,这些策略之前在面对面教育环境中得到了实证验证。通过使用QLearn软件,学生可以生成问题、解释和开发答案、接收老师的反馈并测试他们的知识。使用准实验设计,我们分析了在各种课程设置和教学环境中,使用QLearn作为学习过程支持的学生与使用自己喜欢的学习策略学习相同内容的学生相比,是否表现出不同的学习表现。干预措施是在自愿的基础上提供的,参与者来自不同领域(计算机科学、心理学)和不同的学习水平(本科生和硕士生水平)。结果显示,我们的一些参与者群体从QLearn平台的使用中显著受益。本研究的结果促进了我们对教育背景下技术持续学习效率的理解,并为促进学生积极参与学习过程提供了一个有前景的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Active Learning in Higher Education
Active Learning in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Active Learning in Higher Education is an international, refereed publication for all those who teach and support learning in higher education (HE) and those who undertake or use research into effective learning, teaching and assessment in universities and colleges. The journal is devoted to publishing accounts of research covering all aspects of learning and teaching concerning adults in higher education. Non-discipline specific and non-context/country specific in nature, it comprises accounts of research across all areas of the curriculum; accounts which are relevant to faculty and others involved in learning and teaching in all disciplines, in all countries.
期刊最新文献
Psychological safety in online interdisciplinary student teams: What teachers can do to promote an effective climate for knowledge sharing, collaboration and problem-solving Self-study in higher education: Its role in productive discussions and learning outcomes Higher education students’ conceptions of learning gain Beyond goal setting and planning: An examination of college students’ self-regulated learning forethought processes How does virtual peer presence relate to learning from video lectures and subsequent explanation generation? The moderated mediating roles of motivation and explanation characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1