FAIR Guidelines and Data Regulatory Framework for Digital Health in Nigeria

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Intelligence Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1162/dint_a_00174
A. Kawu, Joseph Elijah, Ibrahim Abdullahi, Jamilu Yahaya Maipanuku, Sakinat Folorunso, Mariam Basajja, Francisca Onaolapo Oladipo, Hauwa Limanko Ibrahim
{"title":"FAIR Guidelines and Data Regulatory Framework for Digital Health in Nigeria","authors":"A. Kawu, Joseph Elijah, Ibrahim Abdullahi, Jamilu Yahaya Maipanuku, Sakinat Folorunso, Mariam Basajja, Francisca Onaolapo Oladipo, Hauwa Limanko Ibrahim","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Adopting the FAIR Guidelines—that data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR)—in the health data system in Nigeria will help protect data against use by unauthorised parties, while also making data more accessible to legitimate users. However, little is known about the FAIR Guidelines and their compatibility with data and health laws and policies in Nigeria. This study assesses the governance framework for digital and health/eHealth policies in Nigeria and explores the possibility of a policy window opening for the FAIR Guidelines to be adopted and implemented in Nigeria's eHealth sector. Ten Nigerian policy documents were examined for mention of the FAIR Guidelines (or FAIR Equivalent terminology) and the 15 sub-criteria or facets. The analysis found that although the FAIR Guidelines are not explicitly mentioned, 70% of the documents contain FAIR Equivalent terminology. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation contained the most FAIR Equivalent principles (73%) and some of the remaining nine documents also contained some FAIR Equivalent principles (between 0–60%). Accordingly, it can be concluded that a policy window is open for the FAIR Guidelines to be adopted and implemented in Nigeria's eHealth sector.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"4 1","pages":"839-851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Adopting the FAIR Guidelines—that data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR)—in the health data system in Nigeria will help protect data against use by unauthorised parties, while also making data more accessible to legitimate users. However, little is known about the FAIR Guidelines and their compatibility with data and health laws and policies in Nigeria. This study assesses the governance framework for digital and health/eHealth policies in Nigeria and explores the possibility of a policy window opening for the FAIR Guidelines to be adopted and implemented in Nigeria's eHealth sector. Ten Nigerian policy documents were examined for mention of the FAIR Guidelines (or FAIR Equivalent terminology) and the 15 sub-criteria or facets. The analysis found that although the FAIR Guidelines are not explicitly mentioned, 70% of the documents contain FAIR Equivalent terminology. The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation contained the most FAIR Equivalent principles (73%) and some of the remaining nine documents also contained some FAIR Equivalent principles (between 0–60%). Accordingly, it can be concluded that a policy window is open for the FAIR Guidelines to be adopted and implemented in Nigeria's eHealth sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚数字卫生公平准则和数据监管框架
在尼日利亚的卫生数据系统中采用公平准则——数据应该是可查找的、可访问的、可互操作的和可重复使用的(FAIR)——将有助于保护数据不被未经授权的各方使用,同时也使合法用户更容易访问数据。然而,人们对《公平准则》及其与尼日利亚的数据和卫生法律和政策的兼容性知之甚少。本研究评估了尼日利亚数字和卫生/电子卫生政策的治理框架,并探讨了在尼日利亚电子卫生部门采用和实施公平准则的政策窗口打开的可能性。审查了10份尼日利亚政策文件,以确定是否提及公平准则(或公平等效术语)和15个子标准或方面。分析发现,虽然没有明确提及FAIR指南,但70%的文件包含FAIR等效术语。《尼日利亚数据保护条例》包含了最公平的等效原则(73%),其余9份文件中的一些也包含了一些公平等效原则(0-60%)。因此,可以得出结论,为尼日利亚的电子卫生部门采用和实施公平准则打开了一个政策窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT Rule Mining Trends from 1987 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Classification and quantification of timestamp data quality issues and its impact on data quality outcome BIKAS: Bio-Inspired Knowledge Acquisition and Simulacrum—A Knowledge Database to Support Multifunctional Design Concept Generation Exploring Attentive Siamese LSTM for Low-Resource Text Plagiarism Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1