GROUPING OF THE EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES AND EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES ACCORDING TO THE DEGREE OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY IN BASIC FOOD PRODUCTS

IF 0.9 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI:10.30858/ZER/100700
A. Jankowska
{"title":"GROUPING OF THE EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES AND EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES ACCORDING TO THE DEGREE OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY IN BASIC FOOD PRODUCTS","authors":"A. Jankowska","doi":"10.30858/ZER/100700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the European Union (EU) candidate countries (CC) and the Eastern Partnership countries (EPC) in terms of their self-sufficiency in basic food products by analysing the average consumption of these products between 1992 and 2013. The countries were grouped according to their self-sufficiency ratios by Ward’s method of cluster analysis. Studies have shown that in the first group of countries in 1992-1999 and 2000-2013 there were primarily Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia and Macedonia, and they had the lowest self-sufficiency ratios for most products compared to the second and the third group of countries. In both periods, in the second group there were Azerbaijan and Turkey, which have the highest self-sufficiency ratio for fruit, and in the third group there were mainly Belarus, Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine. These countries were characterised by surplus in the production of most foods. Research showed that in the second period under consideration, Montenegro moved to a group of countries with a lower level of self-sufficiency. Studies proved that during the period under investigation the increase in the self-sufficiency of these countries resulted from greater production, lesser loss during production and lower consumption of the products under analysis.","PeriodicalId":29744,"journal":{"name":"Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30858/ZER/100700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article compares the European Union (EU) candidate countries (CC) and the Eastern Partnership countries (EPC) in terms of their self-sufficiency in basic food products by analysing the average consumption of these products between 1992 and 2013. The countries were grouped according to their self-sufficiency ratios by Ward’s method of cluster analysis. Studies have shown that in the first group of countries in 1992-1999 and 2000-2013 there were primarily Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia and Macedonia, and they had the lowest self-sufficiency ratios for most products compared to the second and the third group of countries. In both periods, in the second group there were Azerbaijan and Turkey, which have the highest self-sufficiency ratio for fruit, and in the third group there were mainly Belarus, Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine. These countries were characterised by surplus in the production of most foods. Research showed that in the second period under consideration, Montenegro moved to a group of countries with a lower level of self-sufficiency. Studies proved that during the period under investigation the increase in the self-sufficiency of these countries resulted from greater production, lesser loss during production and lower consumption of the products under analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据基本食品自给自足程度对欧盟候选国和东部伙伴关系国家进行分组
文章通过分析1992年至2013年期间欧洲联盟(欧盟)候选国和东方伙伴关系国家在基本食品自给自足方面的平均消费量,对这两个国家进行了比较。根据Ward的聚类分析方法,对这些国家的自给率进行了分组。研究表明,1992-1999年和2000-2013年,第一组国家主要是阿尔巴尼亚、亚美尼亚、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、格鲁吉亚和马其顿,与第二组和第三组国家相比,它们的大多数产品自给率最低。在这两个时期,第二组是水果自给率最高的阿塞拜疆和土耳其,第三组主要是白俄罗斯、摩尔多瓦、塞尔维亚和乌克兰。这些国家的特点是大多数食品生产过剩。研究表明,在审议的第二个时期,黑山属于自给自足水平较低的国家。研究证明,在调查期间,这些国家自给自足的增加是由于所分析产品的产量增加、生产损失减少和消费减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORGANIC FARMING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE FACE OF THE CHALLENGES OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION INFORMAL ECONOMY AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN BANGLADESH: A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS DIRECT AND INDIRECT CONSEQUENCES OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE FOR POLISH TRADE IN AGRI-FOOD PRODUCTS ENVIRONMENTAL, CLIMATE, AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF DAIRY COW FARMING COMPETITIVENESS, PRODUCTIVITY, AND EFFICIENCY OF FARMERS’ COOPERATIVES: EVIDENCE FROM THE POLISH DAIRY INDUSTRY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1