Social lifecycle assessment of adaptive reuse 

Q1 Engineering Buildings & cities Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.5334/bc.314
Rebecka Lundgren
{"title":"Social lifecycle assessment of adaptive reuse ","authors":"Rebecka Lundgren","doi":"10.5334/bc.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and shared spaces has been highlighted as a key circular economy concept in the built environment, with the former also having been found to increase social sustainability through the preservation of cultural heritage. However, circular economy research has focused on the economic and environmental dimensions, with the social dimension receiving less attention. The aim of this study is, therefore, to establish the social impact of an adaptive reuse case with shared spaces. A supplementary aim is to test and adapt the general social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to fit the built environment context. A qualitative single case study method is used. The study finds significant positive social impacts from the adaptive reuse case, mainly in the form of economic and cultural impact on the local community. The S-LCA framework was a useful tool in assessing the social impact of the case. Additional indicators of particular relevance to the built environment are identified relating to the end-users and local community, as well as indicators relating to society, value chain actors, and workers.\nPRACTICE RELEVANCE\nA set of sector-specific indicators is created to capture the social impact.he findings are useful for researchers and industry professionals intending to evaluate and increase the social sustainability of a construction or demolition project. The improved S-LCA framework and set of indicators allows for an improved understanding of built environment implications. Planners, designers, and clients can employ the revised framework to evaluate projects pre- and post-construction or demolition.","PeriodicalId":93168,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and shared spaces has been highlighted as a key circular economy concept in the built environment, with the former also having been found to increase social sustainability through the preservation of cultural heritage. However, circular economy research has focused on the economic and environmental dimensions, with the social dimension receiving less attention. The aim of this study is, therefore, to establish the social impact of an adaptive reuse case with shared spaces. A supplementary aim is to test and adapt the general social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to fit the built environment context. A qualitative single case study method is used. The study finds significant positive social impacts from the adaptive reuse case, mainly in the form of economic and cultural impact on the local community. The S-LCA framework was a useful tool in assessing the social impact of the case. Additional indicators of particular relevance to the built environment are identified relating to the end-users and local community, as well as indicators relating to society, value chain actors, and workers. PRACTICE RELEVANCE A set of sector-specific indicators is created to capture the social impact.he findings are useful for researchers and industry professionals intending to evaluate and increase the social sustainability of a construction or demolition project. The improved S-LCA framework and set of indicators allows for an improved understanding of built environment implications. Planners, designers, and clients can employ the revised framework to evaluate projects pre- and post-construction or demolition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应性重用的社会生命周期评估
现有建筑和共享空间的适应性再利用已被强调为建筑环境中的一个关键循环经济概念,前者也被发现通过保护文化遗产来提高社会可持续性。然而,循环经济的研究主要集中在经济和环境层面,而社会层面的关注较少。因此,本研究的目的是建立具有共享空间的适应性再利用案例的社会影响。补充目标是测试和调整一般社会生命周期评估(S-LCA)框架,以适应建筑环境。采用了定性的单一案例研究方法。研究发现,适应性再利用案例产生了显著的积极社会影响,主要表现为对当地社区的经济和文化影响。S-LCA框架是评估案件社会影响的有用工具。确定了与建筑环境特别相关的与最终用户和当地社区有关的其他指标,以及与社会、价值链参与者和工人有关的指标。实践相关性创建了一套针对特定行业的指标,以捕捉社会影响。这些发现对打算评估和提高建筑或拆迁项目的社会可持续性的研究人员和行业专业人员很有用。改进的S-LCA框架和一套指标有助于更好地理解建筑环境影响。规划者、设计师和客户可以使用修订后的框架来评估项目的施工前和施工后或拆除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place Non-domestic building stock: linking dynamics and spatial distributions Assessing the social values of historic shopping arcades: building biographies The feeling of comfort in residential settings I: a qualitative model Policy tensions in demolition: Dutch social housing and circularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1