The biogeophysical effects of idealized land cover and land management changes in Earth System Models

Steven De Hertog, Felix Havermann, Inne Vanderkelen, Suqi Guo, Fei Luo, I. Manola, D. Coumou, E. Davin, Gregory Duveiller, Q. Lejeune, J. Pongratz, C. Schleussner, S. Seneviratne, W. Thiery
{"title":"The biogeophysical effects of idealized land cover and land management changes in Earth System Models","authors":"Steven De Hertog, Felix Havermann, Inne Vanderkelen, Suqi Guo, Fei Luo, I. Manola, D. Coumou, E. Davin, Gregory Duveiller, Q. Lejeune, J. Pongratz, C. Schleussner, S. Seneviratne, W. Thiery","doi":"10.5194/esd-2022-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Land cover and land management change (LCLMC) has been highlighted for its critical role in mitigation scenarios, both in terms of global mitigation and local adaptation. Yet, the climate effect of individual LCLMC options, their dependence on the background climate and the local vs. non-local responses are still poorly understood across different Earth System Models (ESMs). Here we simulate the climatic effects of LCLMC using three state-of-the-art ESMs, including the Community Earth System Model (CESM), the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) and the European Consortium Earth System Model (EC-EARTH). We assess the LCLMC effects using four idealized experiments: (i) a fully afforested world, (ii) a world fully covered by cropland, (ii) a fully afforested world with extensive wood harvesting, and (iv) a full cropland world with extensive irrigation. In these idealized sensitivity experiments, performed under present-day climate conditions, the effects of the different LCLMC strategies represent an upper bound for the potential of global mitigation and local adaptation. To disentangle the local and non-local effects from the LCLMC, a checkerboard-like LCLMC perturbation, i.e., alternating grid boxes with and without LCLMC, is applied. The local effects of deforestation on surface temperature are largely consistent across the ESMs and the observations, with a cooling in boreal latitudes and a warming in the tropics. However, the energy balance components driving the change in surface temperature show less consistency across the ESMs and the observations. Additionally, some biases exist in specific ESMs, such as a strong albedo response in CESM mid-latitudes and a soil thawing driven warming in boreal latitudes in EC-EARTH. The non-local effects on surface temperature are broadly consistent across ESMs for afforestation, though larger model uncertainty exists for cropland expansion. Irrigation clearly induces a cooling effect, however; the ESMs disagree whether these are mainly local or non-local effects. Wood harvesting is found to have no discernible biogeophysical effects on climate. Our results overall underline the potential of ensemble simulations to inform decision making regarding future climate consequences of land-based mitigation and adaptation strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2022-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract. Land cover and land management change (LCLMC) has been highlighted for its critical role in mitigation scenarios, both in terms of global mitigation and local adaptation. Yet, the climate effect of individual LCLMC options, their dependence on the background climate and the local vs. non-local responses are still poorly understood across different Earth System Models (ESMs). Here we simulate the climatic effects of LCLMC using three state-of-the-art ESMs, including the Community Earth System Model (CESM), the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) and the European Consortium Earth System Model (EC-EARTH). We assess the LCLMC effects using four idealized experiments: (i) a fully afforested world, (ii) a world fully covered by cropland, (ii) a fully afforested world with extensive wood harvesting, and (iv) a full cropland world with extensive irrigation. In these idealized sensitivity experiments, performed under present-day climate conditions, the effects of the different LCLMC strategies represent an upper bound for the potential of global mitigation and local adaptation. To disentangle the local and non-local effects from the LCLMC, a checkerboard-like LCLMC perturbation, i.e., alternating grid boxes with and without LCLMC, is applied. The local effects of deforestation on surface temperature are largely consistent across the ESMs and the observations, with a cooling in boreal latitudes and a warming in the tropics. However, the energy balance components driving the change in surface temperature show less consistency across the ESMs and the observations. Additionally, some biases exist in specific ESMs, such as a strong albedo response in CESM mid-latitudes and a soil thawing driven warming in boreal latitudes in EC-EARTH. The non-local effects on surface temperature are broadly consistent across ESMs for afforestation, though larger model uncertainty exists for cropland expansion. Irrigation clearly induces a cooling effect, however; the ESMs disagree whether these are mainly local or non-local effects. Wood harvesting is found to have no discernible biogeophysical effects on climate. Our results overall underline the potential of ensemble simulations to inform decision making regarding future climate consequences of land-based mitigation and adaptation strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球系统模式中理想化土地覆盖和土地管理变化的生物地球物理效应
摘要土地覆盖和土地管理变化(LCLMC)因其在全球缓解和地方适应方面的缓解情景中的关键作用而受到强调。然而,不同的地球系统模型(ESM)对单个LCLMC选项的气候影响、它们对背景气候的依赖性以及本地与非本地响应的理解仍然很差。在这里,我们使用三个最先进的ESM来模拟LCLMC的气候影响,包括社区地球系统模型(CESM)、马克斯·普朗克气象研究所地球系统模型和欧洲联盟地球系统模型。我们使用四个理想化的实验来评估LCLMC效应:(i)一个完全造林的世界,(ii)一个被农田完全覆盖的世界。在这些在当今气候条件下进行的理想化敏感性实验中,不同LCLMC策略的影响代表了全球缓解和局部适应潜力的上限。为了将局部和非局部效应从LCLMC中分离出来,应用了棋盘式LCLMC扰动,即交替使用和不使用LCLMC的网格框。森林砍伐对地表温度的局部影响在ESM和观测中基本一致,北方纬度地区降温,热带地区变暖。然而,驱动表面温度变化的能量平衡成分在ESM和观测中表现出较差的一致性。此外,在特定的ESM中存在一些偏差,例如CESM中纬度地区的强烈反照率响应,以及EC-EARTH中北纬度地区的土壤融化导致的变暖。尽管农田扩张存在更大的模型不确定性,但造林的ESM对地表温度的非局部影响大致一致。然而,灌溉显然会产生降温效果;ESM不同意这些主要是局部影响还是非局部影响。木材采伐对气候没有明显的生物地球物理影响。我们的研究结果总体上强调了整体模拟的潜力,为陆地缓解和适应战略的未来气候后果决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing the estimation of future climate impacts within the United States. Carbon fluxes in spring wheat agroecosystem in India A 20-year satellite-reanalysis-based climatology of extreme precipitation characteristics over the Sinai Peninsula Impacts of anthropogenic water regulation on global riverine dissolved organic carbon transport Working at the limit: a review of thermodynamics and optimality of the Earth system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1