Predicting Malignancy in FDG-avid Thyroid Nodules based on Standardized Uptake Value in Oncology Patients

Anita Skandarajah, M. Bozin, J. Callahan, E. Drummond, M. Henderson
{"title":"Predicting Malignancy in FDG-avid Thyroid Nodules based on Standardized Uptake Value in Oncology Patients","authors":"Anita Skandarajah, M. Bozin, J. Callahan, E. Drummond, M. Henderson","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"determine if maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-max), representing the maximum uptake of 18-FDG, used a surrogate Aim and objective: Concomitant thyroid nodules and cancer found incidentally on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients imaged for investigation or staging of malignancy have been progressively encountered. Maximum SUV (SUV-max) may aid diagnosis of concomitant thyroid malignancy. Materials and methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed between 2009 and 2014 in which FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas were included. Patients who were investigated with biopsy or surgery were further assessed to determine the utility of SUV-max, mean, and nodule size as a determinate of malignancy. Results: A total of 325 of 35,586 patients were identified with FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (TI)–99 were investigated. The incidence was 0.88%. Forty nine were malignant, with a median SUV-max of 14.5 (range 2.7–60.4). Malignant nodules had higher median SUV-max than benign nodules at a threshold of 5 ( p < 0.0001). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55–0.77, p = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity were 73.4 and 46.9, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 3.12 (95%CI 1.80–5.50) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38. Conclusion: As FDG-avid TI can demonstrate variable uptake, SUV-max is not a useful tool to discriminate benign from malignant TI. SUV-max should remain a theoretical adjunctive tool for predicting thyroid cancer. Clinical significance: The threshold for investigating PET-avid thyroid nodules with ultrasound and FNAC (in the context of primary nonthyroidal malignancy) should be determined by the prognosis of the primary malignancy.","PeriodicalId":53556,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

determine if maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-max), representing the maximum uptake of 18-FDG, used a surrogate Aim and objective: Concomitant thyroid nodules and cancer found incidentally on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients imaged for investigation or staging of malignancy have been progressively encountered. Maximum SUV (SUV-max) may aid diagnosis of concomitant thyroid malignancy. Materials and methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed between 2009 and 2014 in which FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas were included. Patients who were investigated with biopsy or surgery were further assessed to determine the utility of SUV-max, mean, and nodule size as a determinate of malignancy. Results: A total of 325 of 35,586 patients were identified with FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (TI)–99 were investigated. The incidence was 0.88%. Forty nine were malignant, with a median SUV-max of 14.5 (range 2.7–60.4). Malignant nodules had higher median SUV-max than benign nodules at a threshold of 5 ( p < 0.0001). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55–0.77, p = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity were 73.4 and 46.9, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 3.12 (95%CI 1.80–5.50) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38. Conclusion: As FDG-avid TI can demonstrate variable uptake, SUV-max is not a useful tool to discriminate benign from malignant TI. SUV-max should remain a theoretical adjunctive tool for predicting thyroid cancer. Clinical significance: The threshold for investigating PET-avid thyroid nodules with ultrasound and FNAC (in the context of primary nonthyroidal malignancy) should be determined by the prognosis of the primary malignancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于肿瘤患者标准摄取值预测FDG密集型甲状腺结节的恶性肿瘤
确定最大标准化摄取值(SUV-max)(代表18-FDG的最大摄取)是否使用了替代目的和目的:在为恶性肿瘤调查或分期而成像的患者中,18-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET-CT)偶然发现的伴发甲状腺结节和癌症已逐渐出现。最大SUV(SUV max)可能有助于诊断伴随的甲状腺恶性肿瘤。材料和方法:回顾了2009年至2014年间的PET/CT扫描,其中包括FDG狂热的甲状腺偶发瘤。对通过活检或手术进行调查的患者进行进一步评估,以确定SUV最大值、平均值和结节大小作为恶性肿瘤确定因素的效用。结果:35586名患者中,共有325人被确定为FDG狂热型甲状腺偶发瘤(TI),其中99人接受了调查。发病率为0.88%。49例为恶性结节,中位数SUV最大值为14.5(范围2.7-60.4)。在阈值为5(p<0.0001)时,恶性结节的中位数SUV最高值高于良性结节。受试者-操作者曲线(ROC)分析显示,曲线下面积为0.66(95%CI 0.55-0.77,p=0.005)。敏感性和特异性分别为73.4和46.9。阳性和阴性似然比分别为3.12(95%CI 1.80–5.50)和0.38。结论:由于FDG-avid TI可表现出不同的摄取,SUV-max不是区分良性和恶性TI的有用工具,因此SUV-max应仍然是预测甲状腺癌症的理论辅助工具。临床意义:用超声和FNAC(在原发性非甲状腺恶性肿瘤的情况下)研究PET狂热的甲状腺结节的阈值应根据原发性恶性肿瘤的预后来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Case Series on Planned and Accidental Pheochromocytoma Resection Surgery: Role of Preoperative Preparation Parathyroid Carcinoma: A Case Series and Review of Literature Long-standing Renal Amyloidosis Leading to Massive Amyloid Goiter Evaluation of Ultrasound Characteristics and Serum TSH Level in Predicting Malignancy among Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy with FNAC-proven Diagnosis of Multinodular Goiter and Follicular Neoplasia: A Prospective Observational Study Utility of Reticulin Algorithm in Diagnosis of Adrenocortical Tumors: A Re-visit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1