“Medicine Is Not Business, Health Is Not a Commodity, Physicians Are Not Salesmen!” Clinical Labor and Ukraine’s Health Reform

Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1111/awr.12224
Maryna Nading
{"title":"“Medicine Is Not Business, Health Is Not a Commodity, Physicians Are Not Salesmen!” Clinical Labor and Ukraine’s Health Reform","authors":"Maryna Nading","doi":"10.1111/awr.12224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2017, the Ukrainian Parliament approved a bill that marked the start of long-awaited health care reform. Yet it met opposition from the Trade Union of Health Care Workers, which organized a mass protest against the proposed reform. I argue that the union’s resistance can be understood as an accrual of insecurity experienced by providers of clinical labor in Ukraine’s changing health sector in the last several decades. Although no comprehensive overhaul of the health care system had taken place until 2017, there have been changes on the level of everyday practice; these changes have left health care providers disillusioned about the commitment and expertise of politicians to effect positive change in the health sector, forced them to combine several lines of work to generate enough income, and have left them and their patients vulnerable to the market. Supporters of the union found that the language of the reform lacked a commitment to social protections, and instead it focused on poor health indicators, eliminating inefficiencies, cost-saving mechanisms, and physicians’ failures in providing quality care. Trade union demands have attempted to refocus the narrative by drawing attention to the difficult conditions faced by clinical labor in Ukraine and the need to recommit to health care as a human right.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2017, the Ukrainian Parliament approved a bill that marked the start of long-awaited health care reform. Yet it met opposition from the Trade Union of Health Care Workers, which organized a mass protest against the proposed reform. I argue that the union’s resistance can be understood as an accrual of insecurity experienced by providers of clinical labor in Ukraine’s changing health sector in the last several decades. Although no comprehensive overhaul of the health care system had taken place until 2017, there have been changes on the level of everyday practice; these changes have left health care providers disillusioned about the commitment and expertise of politicians to effect positive change in the health sector, forced them to combine several lines of work to generate enough income, and have left them and their patients vulnerable to the market. Supporters of the union found that the language of the reform lacked a commitment to social protections, and instead it focused on poor health indicators, eliminating inefficiencies, cost-saving mechanisms, and physicians’ failures in providing quality care. Trade union demands have attempted to refocus the narrative by drawing attention to the difficult conditions faced by clinical labor in Ukraine and the need to recommit to health care as a human right.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
“医学不是商业,健康不是商品,医生不是推销员!”临床劳动与乌克兰医疗改革
2017年,乌克兰议会批准了一项法案,标志着期待已久的医疗改革的开始。然而,它遭到了卫生保健工作者工会的反对,该工会组织了一场反对拟议改革的大规模抗议活动。我认为,工会的抵抗可以理解为在过去几十年乌克兰不断变化的卫生部门临床劳动提供者所经历的不安全感的累积。尽管直到2017年才对卫生保健系统进行全面改革,但日常实践水平发生了变化;这些变化使卫生保健提供者对政治家在卫生部门实现积极变革的承诺和专业知识不再抱有幻想,迫使他们将几项工作结合起来以产生足够的收入,并使他们和他们的病人容易受到市场的影响。工会的支持者发现,改革的措辞缺乏对社会保护的承诺,而是侧重于糟糕的健康指标、消除低效率、节省成本的机制以及医生在提供高质量护理方面的失败。工会的要求试图通过提请注意乌克兰临床劳动所面临的困难条件以及重新承诺将保健作为一项人权的必要性来重新调整叙述的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1