Layered Landscapes: Links between Brazil and Australia after the Second World War

A. Saniga
{"title":"Layered Landscapes: Links between Brazil and Australia after the Second World War","authors":"A. Saniga","doi":"10.1080/10331867.2021.1925491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The modern garden in Australia after the Second World War reflected international design movements along with new appreciations of the country’s indigenous landscapes. Conservation activities and concern for environmental quality expanded in the face of the development boom’s insatiable quest for resources and unprecedented threats to natural systems. The Australian profession of landscape architecture, institutionalised in 1966, emerged in response. An uneasy association of planners, architects, horticulturalists, foresters and others stemmed from sometimes vastly different standpoints that remarkably coalesced around singular points of reference. One possible source requiring clarification is the work of Brazilian landscape architect and artist, Roberto Burle Marx (1909–94). Evidence suggests that Burle Marx’s alluringly graphic landscape designs struck a chord, sometimes very clearly, influencing Australian designers such as John Oldham (1907–99), John Stevens (1920–2007), and Karl Langer (1903–69) in their landscape designs surrounding freeway interchanges, atop office block car parks, and for tourist resorts alike. This gave their practices a leading edge. In other instances, connections between Burle Marx and Australian founders of the profession were merely subtle traces, and the subliminal influence instead sheds light on the character of the Australian profession rather than overt derivations.","PeriodicalId":42105,"journal":{"name":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","volume":"31 1","pages":"85 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10331867.2021.1925491","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2021.1925491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The modern garden in Australia after the Second World War reflected international design movements along with new appreciations of the country’s indigenous landscapes. Conservation activities and concern for environmental quality expanded in the face of the development boom’s insatiable quest for resources and unprecedented threats to natural systems. The Australian profession of landscape architecture, institutionalised in 1966, emerged in response. An uneasy association of planners, architects, horticulturalists, foresters and others stemmed from sometimes vastly different standpoints that remarkably coalesced around singular points of reference. One possible source requiring clarification is the work of Brazilian landscape architect and artist, Roberto Burle Marx (1909–94). Evidence suggests that Burle Marx’s alluringly graphic landscape designs struck a chord, sometimes very clearly, influencing Australian designers such as John Oldham (1907–99), John Stevens (1920–2007), and Karl Langer (1903–69) in their landscape designs surrounding freeway interchanges, atop office block car parks, and for tourist resorts alike. This gave their practices a leading edge. In other instances, connections between Burle Marx and Australian founders of the profession were merely subtle traces, and the subliminal influence instead sheds light on the character of the Australian profession rather than overt derivations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层景观:第二次世界大战后巴西和澳大利亚之间的联系
摘要第二次世界大战后,澳大利亚的现代花园反映了国际设计运动以及对该国本土景观的新欣赏。面对发展热潮对资源的贪得无厌和对自然系统前所未有的威胁,保护活动和对环境质量的关注有所扩大。1966年制度化的澳大利亚景观建筑专业也应运而生。规划者、建筑师、园艺师、林业工作者和其他人之间的不安联系源于有时截然不同的观点,这些观点围绕着单一的参考点显著地融合在一起。需要澄清的一个可能来源是巴西景观建筑师和艺术家Roberto Burle Marx(1909-94)的作品。有证据表明,伯勒·马克思引人入胜的平面景观设计引起了共鸣,有时甚至非常明显,影响了澳大利亚设计师,如约翰·奥尔德姆(1907–99)、约翰·史蒂文斯(1920–2007)和卡尔·兰格(1903–69)在高速公路立交桥周围、办公楼停车场顶部以及旅游胜地的景观设计。这使他们的做法具有领先优势。在其他情况下,伯勒·马克思和澳大利亚职业创始人之间的联系只是微妙的痕迹,潜意识的影响反而揭示了澳大利亚职业的特征,而不是公开的衍生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
From Hilltop Landmarks to Suburban Place Makers: Brisbane’s Post-War Religious Territories and Communities The Politics of the Visual: Immigrant Architecture in Melbourne’s Tourist Brochures Magnifying the Terrace: David Saunders and the Cross Street Co-Operative Housing Development Form, Function and Monumentality: A Critical Analysis of Jørn Utzon’s Late Work on the Sydney Opera House An Antipodean Attica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1