La gestión del recurso hídrico en Brasil y Colombia, una comparación de sus instrumentos

Luis Fernando Murillo-Bermúdez, Ana Claudia da Silva Abreu
{"title":"La gestión del recurso hídrico en Brasil y Colombia, una comparación de sus instrumentos","authors":"Luis Fernando Murillo-Bermúdez, Ana Claudia da Silva Abreu","doi":"10.15446/ga.v22n2.82554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brazil and Colombia are considered countries with high water availability. They currently present great advances in the effort of Integrated Water Resource Management, although they still exhibit common problems in relation to the various users and uses within their territories. This work comparatively analyzes five management instruments (planning, classification of water bodies, concessions and charges for water use and finally the use of information systems on water resources), renewing the discussion about the established management models, denoting deficiencies in the application of the regulations for both countries. In Brazil, the system is more mature and has more guarantees of citizen participation. The Colombian system is at an earlier stage of development, with a strong connection to environmental management. The adoption of the watershed as a management unit is a conflict point for not coinciding with the traditional political-administrative limits. The Alto Lebrija river basin, in Colombia and the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiai basins, in Brazil, are taken as local examples for a better understanding of the proposed comparison.","PeriodicalId":30434,"journal":{"name":"Gestion y Ambiente","volume":"22 1","pages":"173-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestion y Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n2.82554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Brazil and Colombia are considered countries with high water availability. They currently present great advances in the effort of Integrated Water Resource Management, although they still exhibit common problems in relation to the various users and uses within their territories. This work comparatively analyzes five management instruments (planning, classification of water bodies, concessions and charges for water use and finally the use of information systems on water resources), renewing the discussion about the established management models, denoting deficiencies in the application of the regulations for both countries. In Brazil, the system is more mature and has more guarantees of citizen participation. The Colombian system is at an earlier stage of development, with a strong connection to environmental management. The adoption of the watershed as a management unit is a conflict point for not coinciding with the traditional political-administrative limits. The Alto Lebrija river basin, in Colombia and the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiai basins, in Brazil, are taken as local examples for a better understanding of the proposed comparison.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西和哥伦比亚水资源管理及其工具的比较
巴西和哥伦比亚被认为是水资源充足的国家。它们目前在水资源综合管理方面取得了巨大进展,尽管它们在其领土内的各种用户和用途方面仍然存在共同问题。这项工作比较分析了五种管理手段(规划、水体分类、用水特许权和收费,最后是水资源信息系统的使用),重新讨论了已建立的管理模式,指出了两国在应用法规方面的不足。在巴西,这一制度更加成熟,公民参与也有更多保障。哥伦比亚的系统正处于早期发展阶段,与环境管理有着密切的联系。采用流域作为管理单位是一个冲突点,因为它不符合传统的政治行政限制。以哥伦比亚的Alto Lebrija河流域和巴西的Piraciba、Capivari和Jundiai流域为当地实例,以更好地理解拟议的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metodologías participativas en la elaboración de estrategias de monitoreo comunitario de cantidad de agua para su gestión. Estudio de caso: Acueducto Comunitario Asoporquera, vereda Mochuelo Alto, Bogotá, DC Un enfoque desde la sustentabilidad: análisis de ciclo de vida como herramienta para la toma de decisiones en el desarrollo de proyectos hidroeléctricos en Colombia Energías comunitarias para la transición justa Política y emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero: el caso de Hidrosogamoso como Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio Participación ciudadana y conflictos ambientales en el Proyecto Hidroeléctrico Montebonito, Caldas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1