SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity rate and predictor factors for RT-PCR results in COVID-19 disease

Melike Badoglu, S. Gulgosteren, Ş. Atikcan
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity rate and predictor factors for RT-PCR results in COVID-19 disease","authors":"Melike Badoglu, S. Gulgosteren, Ş. Atikcan","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_36_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus was identified and caused the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. The gold standard diagnostic method is the detection of nucleic acid in respiratory tract samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). But there might be false-negative results. The aim of this retrospective study was to find the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity rate in patients hospitalized due to viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19 disease and to find predictor factors for RT-PCR results. Materials and methods: Adult (≥18 years of age) patients hospitalized due to viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19 were enrolled. Results: One hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled in the study. Sixty six (34.6%) were female, and 125 (65.4%) were male. The mean age was 59.7. The RT-PCR positivity rate was 11.5%. Smoking status, confirmed fever, bronchial changes, left lower lobe involvement, and ≥3 affected lobes in CT, leukopenia, high PCT level, and <3 RT-PCR examinations per patient were found to be independent factors for the PCR result (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We found independent predictors for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity and negativity in viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19. Despite false negative results, COVID-19 patients could be diagnosed with the help of clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_36_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus was identified and caused the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. The gold standard diagnostic method is the detection of nucleic acid in respiratory tract samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). But there might be false-negative results. The aim of this retrospective study was to find the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity rate in patients hospitalized due to viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19 disease and to find predictor factors for RT-PCR results. Materials and methods: Adult (≥18 years of age) patients hospitalized due to viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19 were enrolled. Results: One hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled in the study. Sixty six (34.6%) were female, and 125 (65.4%) were male. The mean age was 59.7. The RT-PCR positivity rate was 11.5%. Smoking status, confirmed fever, bronchial changes, left lower lobe involvement, and ≥3 affected lobes in CT, leukopenia, high PCT level, and <3 RT-PCR examinations per patient were found to be independent factors for the PCR result (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We found independent predictors for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity and negativity in viral pneumonia consistent with COVID-19. Despite false negative results, COVID-19 patients could be diagnosed with the help of clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性率及预测因素
背景/目的:2019年12月,一种新型冠状病毒被发现并引起了SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)大流行。金标准诊断方法是实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测呼吸道样本中的核酸。但可能会有假阴性结果。本回顾性研究的目的是寻找符合COVID-19疾病的病毒性肺炎住院患者的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性率,并寻找RT-PCR结果的预测因素。材料与方法:纳入与COVID-19相符的病毒性肺炎住院的成人(≥18岁)患者。结果:191例患者入组研究。其中女性66例(34.6%),男性125例(65.4%)。平均年龄为59.7岁。RT-PCR阳性率为11.5%。吸烟、确诊发热、支气管改变、左下肺叶受累、CT≥3个受累肺叶、白细胞减少、PCT水平高、RT-PCR检查<3次均为影响PCR结果的独立因素(P < 0.05)。结论:我们发现了与COVID-19一致的病毒性肺炎中SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性和阴性的独立预测因子。尽管结果为假阴性,但在临床、实验室和放射检查的帮助下,COVID-19患者仍可得到诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with prognostic risk factors: A study in the hilly state of North India A radiolucent cystic lesion in a chest radiograph of a breathless child − a case report Persistent residual lung abnormalities as final outcome in recovered severe COVID-19 pneumonia with lung function abnormalities in spirometry: Pulmonologist and radiologist perspective Wegener’s granulomatosis versus pulmonary tuberculosis: a dilemma Carcinoid tumorlet/typical carcinoid of the lung: An incidental bronchoscopic finding and cytological dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1