Co-created research agenda to support advocacy toward social inclusion for sexual and gender minorities in sub-Saharan Africa

E. Igonya, A. Ajayi, E. Otukpa, Kenneth Juma, Ramatou Ouedraogo, G. Kibunja, Meggie Mwoka, Winnie Opondo, C. Kabiru, B. Ushie
{"title":"Co-created research agenda to support advocacy toward social inclusion for sexual and gender minorities in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"E. Igonya, A. Ajayi, E. Otukpa, Kenneth Juma, Ramatou Ouedraogo, G. Kibunja, Meggie Mwoka, Winnie Opondo, C. Kabiru, B. Ushie","doi":"10.1080/10538720.2022.2041523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Advocacy actors play a unique role in promoting changes in policy, legal, and social environments for sexual and gender minorities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, their efforts may be hampered by limited incorporation of evidence because there is a massive gulf between what researchers focus on and what evidence users need. Together with fifty key stakeholders across SSA, we—a team of researchers and policy engagement specialists—co-created a research agenda and identified policy goals and research priorities to support evidence-informed policy and advocacy that can foster social inclusion of sexual and gender minorities in the region. We identified six research priority areas: (1) The history of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people and people whose identities do not conform to typical binary notions of male and female, or identify themselves using other categories to describe sexuality (LGBT+) in Africa and their lived realities; (2) Cost of non-inclusion and benefits of inclusion; (3) Strategies fostering inclusion; (4) Challenges and needs of LGBT + people; and (5) Implementation science on the effectiveness of provisions in sexual and reproductive health and HIV strategies or guidelines; and (6) Understanding the existing policy and legal architecture. This co-created research agenda can guide the generation of policy-relevant evidence, increase collaboration between researchers and policy actors, and increase research uptake to support efforts toward inclusion.","PeriodicalId":46685,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2022.2041523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Advocacy actors play a unique role in promoting changes in policy, legal, and social environments for sexual and gender minorities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, their efforts may be hampered by limited incorporation of evidence because there is a massive gulf between what researchers focus on and what evidence users need. Together with fifty key stakeholders across SSA, we—a team of researchers and policy engagement specialists—co-created a research agenda and identified policy goals and research priorities to support evidence-informed policy and advocacy that can foster social inclusion of sexual and gender minorities in the region. We identified six research priority areas: (1) The history of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people and people whose identities do not conform to typical binary notions of male and female, or identify themselves using other categories to describe sexuality (LGBT+) in Africa and their lived realities; (2) Cost of non-inclusion and benefits of inclusion; (3) Strategies fostering inclusion; (4) Challenges and needs of LGBT + people; and (5) Implementation science on the effectiveness of provisions in sexual and reproductive health and HIV strategies or guidelines; and (6) Understanding the existing policy and legal architecture. This co-created research agenda can guide the generation of policy-relevant evidence, increase collaboration between researchers and policy actors, and increase research uptake to support efforts toward inclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同制定研究议程,支持倡导撒哈拉以南非洲的性少数群体和性别少数群体融入社会
摘要倡导行动者在促进撒哈拉以南非洲性少数群体和性别少数群体的政策、法律和社会环境变化方面发挥着独特作用。然而,他们的努力可能会受到证据有限的阻碍,因为研究人员关注的内容和用户需要的证据之间存在巨大差距。我们——一个由研究人员和政策参与专家组成的团队——与SSA的50个关键利益相关者一起,共同制定了一项研究议程,确定了政策目标和研究重点,以支持基于证据的政策和倡导,从而促进该地区性少数群体和性别少数群体的社会包容。我们确定了六个研究重点领域:(1)女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的历史,以及那些身份不符合典型的男性和女性二元观念的人,或者使用其他类别来描述非洲的性行为(LGBT+)及其生活现实的人;(2) 非包容性的成本和包容性的好处;(3) 促进包容性的战略;(4) LGBT的挑战和需求 + 人以及(5)关于性健康和生殖健康以及艾滋病毒战略或准则中各项规定的有效性的执行科学;(6)了解现有的政策和法律架构。这一共同创建的研究议程可以指导政策相关证据的生成,增加研究人员和政策参与者之间的合作,并增加研究吸收,以支持包容性的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services provides empirical knowledge and conceptual information related to sexual minorities and their social environment. Filled with innovative ideas and resources for the design, evaluation, and delivery of social services for these populations at all stages of life, the journal is a positive influence on the development of public and social policy, programs and services, and social work practice. Dedicated to the development of knowledge which meets the practical needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people in their social context, the Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services is a forum for studying.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services Sexual and gender minoritized youth on the impact of a community-based program The absolute truth: Alcohol companies sponsored disproportionately more queer Pride festivals than July Fourth festivals in 2019 Factors associated with Peruvian LGBTI people’s knowledge of organizations that defend their human rights Iconic illustrations initiate critical dialogues among heterosexual men who then develop critical consciousness around homophobia and sexism: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1