John Locke on Reading the Bible: Rational Obscurity and the Lockean “Rule”

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Political Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/1462317X.2022.2083627
J. Brown
{"title":"John Locke on Reading the Bible: Rational Obscurity and the Lockean “Rule”","authors":"J. Brown","doi":"10.1080/1462317X.2022.2083627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay resists the tendency to separate Lockean reason from revelation, and his political concerns from his Christian theology. Rather than a repudiation, in significant ways, Locke’s Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St. Paul is the application of his methodological or hermeneutic approach to reading scripture laid out in the Essay Concerning Human Understanding. While the fundamental articles of Christianity were “plain” and “clear” in the gospels, requiring minimal interpretation, far more labor was required to render Paul’s sense “plain” and “clear.” Rather than a simplistic notion of doctrinal minimalism, Locke’s Christianity amplified order, duty, and obedience. It is his commitment to the interdependence of faith and reason which grounds Locke’s conviction that expressions of faith contrary to reason and destructive of civil order exceeded the bounds of legitimate religious expression.","PeriodicalId":43759,"journal":{"name":"Political Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2022.2083627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay resists the tendency to separate Lockean reason from revelation, and his political concerns from his Christian theology. Rather than a repudiation, in significant ways, Locke’s Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St. Paul is the application of his methodological or hermeneutic approach to reading scripture laid out in the Essay Concerning Human Understanding. While the fundamental articles of Christianity were “plain” and “clear” in the gospels, requiring minimal interpretation, far more labor was required to render Paul’s sense “plain” and “clear.” Rather than a simplistic notion of doctrinal minimalism, Locke’s Christianity amplified order, duty, and obedience. It is his commitment to the interdependence of faith and reason which grounds Locke’s conviction that expressions of faith contrary to reason and destructive of civil order exceeded the bounds of legitimate religious expression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约翰·洛克谈读经:理性的朦胧与洛克的“规则”
摘要本文抵制将洛克理性与启示分离的倾向,抵制将洛克的政治关切与基督教神学分离的倾向。洛克的《圣保罗书信释义》在很大程度上不是一种否定,而是他在阅读《关于人类理解的散文》中所阐述的经文时运用了方法论或解释学方法。虽然基督教的基本条款在福音书中是“朴素”和“清晰”的,需要最少的解释,但要让保罗的感觉变得“平淡”和“明确”,需要付出更多的努力。洛克的基督教不是简单的教义极简主义概念,而是放大了秩序、责任和服从。正是他对信仰和理性相互依存的承诺,使洛克坚信,违背理性和破坏民事秩序的信仰表达超出了合法宗教表达的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Theology
Political Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊最新文献
Queer Madonnas, Nonviolence, and the Macho Christian Right; or “How to Do Mariology Without Men” Political Intertheology Amīna and the Breaking of the Secular Silence: Revisiting The Cairo Trilogy by Naguib Mahfouz All Her Sons: Politics and Gender in the Jewish Cult at Rachel’s Tomb of the Last Three Decades Colonial Sense and Religious Sensibility: Understanding Injury and the Body of Nation in Censored Literature in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1