Limits to Party Autonomy in Appointing Counsel in International Commercial Arbitration

Mikhail Batsura
{"title":"Limits to Party Autonomy in Appointing Counsel in International Commercial Arbitration","authors":"Mikhail Batsura","doi":"10.54648/joia2021032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right of a party to appoint its own counsel is an integral aspect of party autonomy and one of the fundamental rights enjoyed by the parties in international arbitration. However, party autonomy is not absolute and has its limitations. This article discusses whether the parties are free to appoint their legal counsel or face any applicable restrictions when making such appointment. The article invites a discussion on an existence of the immutability principle in international commercial arbitration and its tension with party autonomy in the selection of legal counsel (if any). Finally, the article proposes possible solutions for regulation of a party’s right to appoint a counsel of choice.\ninternational commercial arbitration, party autonomy, due process, right to appoint a counsel, arbitral tribunal, immutability principle, inherent powers, IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration, LCIA Rules: General Guidelines for the Authorised Representatives of the Parties, disqualificationMikhail Batsura","PeriodicalId":43527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Arbitration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2021032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right of a party to appoint its own counsel is an integral aspect of party autonomy and one of the fundamental rights enjoyed by the parties in international arbitration. However, party autonomy is not absolute and has its limitations. This article discusses whether the parties are free to appoint their legal counsel or face any applicable restrictions when making such appointment. The article invites a discussion on an existence of the immutability principle in international commercial arbitration and its tension with party autonomy in the selection of legal counsel (if any). Finally, the article proposes possible solutions for regulation of a party’s right to appoint a counsel of choice. international commercial arbitration, party autonomy, due process, right to appoint a counsel, arbitral tribunal, immutability principle, inherent powers, IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration, LCIA Rules: General Guidelines for the Authorised Representatives of the Parties, disqualificationMikhail Batsura
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际商事仲裁中当事人委任律师自主权的限制
当事人指定自己的律师的权利是当事人意思自治的一个组成部分,也是当事人在国际仲裁中享有的基本权利之一。然而,政党自治并不是绝对的,也有其局限性。本条讨论了当事人是否可以自由任命其法律顾问,或者在任命时是否面临任何适用的限制。本文邀请讨论国际商事仲裁中不可变更原则的存在及其与当事人在选择法律顾问(如有)时的自主权之间的紧张关系。最后,文章提出了规范当事人指定律师权的可能解决方案。国际商事仲裁、当事人自主权、正当程序、指定律师权、仲裁庭、不变性原则、固有权力、IBA《国际仲裁当事人代表准则》,LCIA规则:双方授权代表的一般指南,取消Mikhail Batsura的资格
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Since its 1984 launch, the Journal of International Arbitration has established itself as a thought provoking, ground breaking journal aimed at the specific requirements of those involved in international arbitration. Each issue contains in depth investigations of the most important current issues in international arbitration, focusing on business, investment, and economic disputes between private corporations, State controlled entities, and States. The new Notes and Current Developments sections contain concise and critical commentary on new developments. The journal’s worldwide coverage and bimonthly circulation give it even more immediacy as a forum for original thinking, penetrating analysis and lively discussion of international arbitration issues from around the globe.
期刊最新文献
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Providing for Arbitration in Mainland China Administered by Overseas Arbitration Institutions ZF Auto. v. Luxshare: Supreme Court’s Withdrawal of Judicial Assistance for Discovery from Private Arbitration Political Risk and Its Key Role in Mining Disputes Around the World A New Era of Maritime Arbitration: Ex Machina Determinations Arbitrating Investment Disputes in Time of Geopolitical Unrest: Focus on Investment Protection in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1