Assessment of Relationship for Both Seedling and Maturity Traits with SSR Markers under Drought Conditions in Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum L.)

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY Egyptian Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.21608/agro.2021.70975.1255
M. El-rawy, M. Sayed, M. Said
{"title":"Assessment of Relationship for Both Seedling and Maturity Traits with SSR Markers under Drought Conditions in Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum L.)","authors":"M. El-rawy, M. Sayed, M. Said","doi":"10.21608/agro.2021.70975.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-one cultivars of bread wheat were evaluated for drought-stress tolerance at seedling ‎and maturity stages under non-drought and drought-stress conditions. Significant differences among ‎genotypes were obtained under non-drought and drought-stress conditions for all seedling and ‎maturity characteristics. Highly positive and significant correlations were found for root length with ‎respect to fresh weight of 0.74 and dry weight seedling of 0.80. However, negative and highly ‎significant correlations were found for both drought susceptible index based on seedling traits ‎‎(DSIST) and maturity traits (DSIST) with all seedling traits except root: shoot ratio, whereas no ‎correlations were obtained for either DSIST or DSIMT with all maturity traits except 1000 kernel ‎weight. Positive and highly significant correlation found between DSIST and DSIMT (0.85). SSR ‎markers analysis showed that three bands produced by Xgwm596-7A (507 bp), Xgwm497-1A (556 ‎bp) and Xgwm174-5D (409 bp), they were presented in all tolerant genotypes based on DSIST. The ‎three bands (507, 556 and 409 bp) were correlated to DSIST, with R2 values of 81.05%, whereas the ‎three bands were correlated to DSIMT with R2 values of 61.96%. Strong association was observed for ‎genotypic distance with phenotypic distance based on seedling characteristics, that amounted to ‎‎0.66, whereas the correlation was less strong between genotypic distance and phenotypic distance ‎based on maturity traits by 0.30. The seedling traits at 15% PEG were more association than maturity ‎traits under drought-stress with SSR markers, this gives preference to using seedling traits as an ‎indicator of drought-stress tolerance in breeding programs.‎","PeriodicalId":42226,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2021.70975.1255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty-one cultivars of bread wheat were evaluated for drought-stress tolerance at seedling ‎and maturity stages under non-drought and drought-stress conditions. Significant differences among ‎genotypes were obtained under non-drought and drought-stress conditions for all seedling and ‎maturity characteristics. Highly positive and significant correlations were found for root length with ‎respect to fresh weight of 0.74 and dry weight seedling of 0.80. However, negative and highly ‎significant correlations were found for both drought susceptible index based on seedling traits ‎‎(DSIST) and maturity traits (DSIST) with all seedling traits except root: shoot ratio, whereas no ‎correlations were obtained for either DSIST or DSIMT with all maturity traits except 1000 kernel ‎weight. Positive and highly significant correlation found between DSIST and DSIMT (0.85). SSR ‎markers analysis showed that three bands produced by Xgwm596-7A (507 bp), Xgwm497-1A (556 ‎bp) and Xgwm174-5D (409 bp), they were presented in all tolerant genotypes based on DSIST. The ‎three bands (507, 556 and 409 bp) were correlated to DSIST, with R2 values of 81.05%, whereas the ‎three bands were correlated to DSIMT with R2 values of 61.96%. Strong association was observed for ‎genotypic distance with phenotypic distance based on seedling characteristics, that amounted to ‎‎0.66, whereas the correlation was less strong between genotypic distance and phenotypic distance ‎based on maturity traits by 0.30. The seedling traits at 15% PEG were more association than maturity ‎traits under drought-stress with SSR markers, this gives preference to using seedling traits as an ‎indicator of drought-stress tolerance in breeding programs.‎
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干旱条件下面包小麦(Triticum asetivum L.)幼苗和成熟性状与SSR标记关系的评价
对21个面包小麦品种的幼苗抗旱性进行了评价‎以及在非干旱和干旱胁迫条件下的成熟阶段。在‎在非干旱和干旱胁迫条件下获得了所有幼苗的基因型‎成熟度特征。根长与‎鲜重0.74,干重0.80。然而,消极和高度‎基于幼苗性状的两个干旱敏感指数均存在显著相关性‎‎(DSIST)和成熟度性状(DSIST),除根冠比外的所有幼苗性状,而没有‎DSIST或DSIMT与除1000粒外的所有成熟度性状都具有相关性‎重量DSIST与DSIMT呈正相关(0.85)。SSR‎标记分析表明,Xgwm596-7A(507 bp)、Xgwm497-1A(556‎bp)和Xgwm174-5D(409bp),它们在基于DSIST的所有耐受基因型中都存在。这个‎三个条带(507556和409bp)与DSIST相关,R2值为81.05%,而‎三个谱带与DSIMT相关,R2值为61.96%‎基因型距离与基于幼苗特征的表型距离,相当于‎‎0.66,而基因型距离和表型距离之间的相关性不那么强‎基于成熟度性状增加0.30。在15%PEG条件下,幼苗性状的相关性大于成熟度‎利用SSR标记对干旱胁迫下的性状进行标记,这优先使用幼苗性状作为‎育种项目中抗旱性指标。‎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Phyto-extraction Potential of Duranta erecta's Against Heavy Metal Assisting by EDTA and Citric Acid for Mitigating Industrial Polluted Soil Exploring genetic variation through line x tester analysis of sunflower genotypes for yield and oil traits under adverse environment Environmental stability and adaptation of several rice (Oryza Sativa L.) cultivars with different climate change . The possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles in agricultural activities in Turkey Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality For Some Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1