Assessment of Sugarcane Genotypes for Red Rot Resistance and Antifungal Activity of Rhizosphere Microbiota against Colletotricum falcatum

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences International Journal of Agriculture and Biology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.17957/ijab/15.1830
S. Aslam
{"title":"Assessment of Sugarcane Genotypes for Red Rot Resistance and Antifungal Activity of Rhizosphere Microbiota against Colletotricum falcatum","authors":"S. Aslam","doi":"10.17957/ijab/15.1830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to screen the potential of locally grown sugarcane genotypes for red rot resistance and activity of native microbial strains against the pathogen. Field trials were conducted with 70 genotypes for consecutive years and results showed that only two genotypes viz., SSRI-1 and CO-0238 showed resistant behavior towards red rot of sugarcane. The red rot pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum Went was characterized and pathogenicity tests on two susceptible genotypes (NSG-59 and CPSG-2923) showed high virulence of SUCF04 isolate to develop severe disease lesions. The native rhizospheric microbiota was screened for microbial consortia exhibiting fine antifungal activity against the highly virulent pathogenic strain. The antagonism assay exposed that 10 bacterial isolates out of 46 showed great potential for antifungal activity. The selected bacterial isolates revealed 68–99% pathogen inhibition during the assay. The fungal strains with biological control potential inhibited the pathogen growth by 20–80% and a group of three strains with more than 50% antifungal activity were characterized. The molecular characterization of these microbes revealed that the isolates were belonging to Bacillus subtilus, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescence, Trichoderma harzianum and several other important taxa. This study revealed that only two sugarcane genotypes were found as resistant against red rot pathogen, while most of the genotypes showed susceptible to moderately susceptible response. Moreover, the native residential microbiota associated with sugarcane exhibited great antifungal potential and can be utilized for disease protection and improved crop productivity. © 2021 Friends Science Publishers","PeriodicalId":13769,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17957/ijab/15.1830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to screen the potential of locally grown sugarcane genotypes for red rot resistance and activity of native microbial strains against the pathogen. Field trials were conducted with 70 genotypes for consecutive years and results showed that only two genotypes viz., SSRI-1 and CO-0238 showed resistant behavior towards red rot of sugarcane. The red rot pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum Went was characterized and pathogenicity tests on two susceptible genotypes (NSG-59 and CPSG-2923) showed high virulence of SUCF04 isolate to develop severe disease lesions. The native rhizospheric microbiota was screened for microbial consortia exhibiting fine antifungal activity against the highly virulent pathogenic strain. The antagonism assay exposed that 10 bacterial isolates out of 46 showed great potential for antifungal activity. The selected bacterial isolates revealed 68–99% pathogen inhibition during the assay. The fungal strains with biological control potential inhibited the pathogen growth by 20–80% and a group of three strains with more than 50% antifungal activity were characterized. The molecular characterization of these microbes revealed that the isolates were belonging to Bacillus subtilus, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescence, Trichoderma harzianum and several other important taxa. This study revealed that only two sugarcane genotypes were found as resistant against red rot pathogen, while most of the genotypes showed susceptible to moderately susceptible response. Moreover, the native residential microbiota associated with sugarcane exhibited great antifungal potential and can be utilized for disease protection and improved crop productivity. © 2021 Friends Science Publishers
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗抗红腐病基因型及根际微生物群抗镰状炭疽菌活性评价
本研究的目的是筛选本地种植的甘蔗基因型抗红腐病的潜力和本地微生物菌株对病原菌的活性。对70个基因型进行了连续多年的田间试验,结果表明,只有2个基因型SSRI-1和CO-0238对甘蔗红腐病表现出抗性。对红腐病菌镰孢炭疽病菌(Colletotrichum falcatum go)进行了鉴定,对2个敏感基因型(NSG-59和CPSG-2923)的致病性试验表明,SUCF04分离物具有较高的毒力,可引起严重的疾病病变。对本地根际微生物群进行筛选,筛选出对高毒力病原菌具有良好抗真菌活性的微生物联合体。拮抗实验表明,46株分离菌中有10株表现出很强的抗真菌活性。结果表明,所选菌株对病原菌的抑制率为68-99%。具有生物防治潜力的真菌菌株对病原菌生长的抑制作用为20 ~ 80%,抑菌活性大于50%的一组菌株为3株。这些分离物的分子特征表明,它们属于亚贻贝芽孢杆菌、恶臭假单胞菌、荧光假单胞菌、哈茨木霉等几个重要类群。本研究发现,只有2种甘蔗基因型对红腐病病原具有抗性,而大多数基因型对红腐病病原具有中感反应。此外,与甘蔗相关的本地居住微生物群显示出巨大的抗真菌潜力,可以用于疾病保护和提高作物生产力。©2021朋友科学出版社
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The Possible Protective Effect of Luteolin in a Thioacetamide Rat Model of Testicular Toxicity Improvement of Micropropagation through Combination of Plant Growth Regulators in Indonesian Sorghum Hybrid Cultivar ‘MARKAZ-2019’: A Spring Wheat Variety for Rainfed Areas of Pakistan Field and In Vitro Evaluation of Mandarin Cultivars Resistance to Alternaria alternata Effects of Threonine Supplementation in Low Protein Diet on Broilers Growth Performance and Biochemical Parameters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1