Influencing factors and gaps of blood donation knowledge among university and college students in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Research Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.1108/JHR-10-2020-0500
P. Viwattanakulvanid, Aye Chan Oo
{"title":"Influencing factors and gaps of blood donation knowledge among university and college students in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study","authors":"P. Viwattanakulvanid, Aye Chan Oo","doi":"10.1108/JHR-10-2020-0500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Blood donation knowledge of healthy young students is crucial to donate blood voluntarily and regularly in long-term. This study aimed to determine the influencing factors on the blood donation knowledge, to identify gaps of blood donation knowledge and reasons for not donating blood among university and college students in Yangon, Myanmar. Design/methodology/approach – Cross-section survey (May 2019) was conducted in students of Yangon Technological University (YTU) and National Management Degree College (NMDC) with the use of quota and convenience sampling method. The questionnaires covered sociodemographic characteristics, blood donation knowledge and reasons for not donating blood. Findings –Total 320 students (129males and 191 females) with age of 18 to 23 years old participated. Previous blood donation had statistically significant influence on blood donation knowledge scores (ß5 0.396, p<0.001). Gaps of knowledge between nondonors and blood donors were recorded, especially in universal recipient blood groups, Rh blood groups, blood donation interval, eligibility criteria, transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs), amount of blood removed in donation, benefits of blood donations and misbelief of infections from blood donation. Top three reasons for not donating blood among nondonorswere (1) no opportunity, (2) fear to donate and (3) still underage to donate. Originality/value – Blood donations programs should extend awareness-raising programs in academic society and population at large. Raising awareness should focus on the knowledge gaps such as donor eligibility, interval of blood donations, TTIs and benefits of donating blood to recipients.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-10-2020-0500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose – Blood donation knowledge of healthy young students is crucial to donate blood voluntarily and regularly in long-term. This study aimed to determine the influencing factors on the blood donation knowledge, to identify gaps of blood donation knowledge and reasons for not donating blood among university and college students in Yangon, Myanmar. Design/methodology/approach – Cross-section survey (May 2019) was conducted in students of Yangon Technological University (YTU) and National Management Degree College (NMDC) with the use of quota and convenience sampling method. The questionnaires covered sociodemographic characteristics, blood donation knowledge and reasons for not donating blood. Findings –Total 320 students (129males and 191 females) with age of 18 to 23 years old participated. Previous blood donation had statistically significant influence on blood donation knowledge scores (ß5 0.396, p<0.001). Gaps of knowledge between nondonors and blood donors were recorded, especially in universal recipient blood groups, Rh blood groups, blood donation interval, eligibility criteria, transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs), amount of blood removed in donation, benefits of blood donations and misbelief of infections from blood donation. Top three reasons for not donating blood among nondonorswere (1) no opportunity, (2) fear to donate and (3) still underage to donate. Originality/value – Blood donations programs should extend awareness-raising programs in academic society and population at large. Raising awareness should focus on the knowledge gaps such as donor eligibility, interval of blood donations, TTIs and benefits of donating blood to recipients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缅甸大学生献血知识的影响因素及差距:横断面研究
目的——健康青年学生的献血知识对于长期自愿、定期献血至关重要。本研究旨在确定影响献血知识的因素,找出缅甸仰光地区大学生献血知识的差距和不献血的原因。设计/方法/方法——采用配额和方便抽样法,对仰光理工大学(YTU)和国家管理学位学院(NMDC)的学生进行了横断面调查(2019年5月)。调查问卷涵盖了社会人口特征、献血知识和不献血的原因。调查结果——共有320名18至23岁的学生(129名男性和191名女性)参加了调查。既往献血对献血知识得分有统计学显著影响(ß5 0.396,p<0.001)。记录了非献血者和献血者之间的知识差距,特别是在通用受体血型、Rh血型、献血间隔时间、合格标准、输血传播感染(TTI)、献血中去除的血液量,献血的好处和对献血感染的误解。非献血者不献血的三大原因是:(1)没有机会,(2)害怕献血,(3)还未成年。原创性/价值-献血计划应扩大学术社会和广大民众的意识提高计划。提高认识应侧重于知识差距,如献血者资格、献血间隔、TTI和向接受者献血的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Cancer Education Program in Rural Counties with the Lowest HPV Vaccination Rates and Health Rankings. The Evaluation of Collaborative Disease Prevention and Control Measures for Border Health Between Thailand and Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia Development and Implementation of a Unique, Tailored School Lunch Training Program for Teachers and their Stakeholders at Public Primary Schools in Thailand Understanding Digital Well-being and Insights From Technological Impacts on University Students’ Everyday Lives in Bangkok Anxiety and depression in palliative care cancer patients in Vietnam: baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary palliative care versus standard care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1