The Historical Record on Active versus Passive Mutual Fund Performance

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Investing Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.3905/joi.2021.1.212
David Nanigian
{"title":"The Historical Record on Active versus Passive Mutual Fund Performance","authors":"David Nanigian","doi":"10.3905/joi.2021.1.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the risk-adjusted performance of actively managed mutual funds versus passively managed mutual funds between 1991 and 2019 and finds that there is no statistically significant difference in performance between the two types of funds when the passively managed funds are compared to competitively priced actively managed funds. The practical implication of this study is that, setting tax considerations aside, as long as investors are cost-conscious in their fund selection process, investing in passively managed funds does not meaningfully improve investor outcomes.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2021.1.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the risk-adjusted performance of actively managed mutual funds versus passively managed mutual funds between 1991 and 2019 and finds that there is no statistically significant difference in performance between the two types of funds when the passively managed funds are compared to competitively priced actively managed funds. The practical implication of this study is that, setting tax considerations aside, as long as investors are cost-conscious in their fund selection process, investing in passively managed funds does not meaningfully improve investor outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动与被动共同基金业绩的历史记录
本研究考察了1991年至2019年间主动管理共同基金与被动管理共同基金的风险调整后业绩,发现当被动管理基金与定价有竞争力的主动管理基金相比时,这两类基金的业绩没有统计学上的显著差异。这项研究的实际含义是,抛开税收因素不谈,只要投资者在基金选择过程中有成本意识,投资被动管理基金就不会有意义地改善投资者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
A New Global Portfolio Weighting Strategy Based on Cointegration Methods “I Have Never Seen a Bad Backtest”: Modeling Reality in Quantitative Investing Predicting Market Risk Premiums with Historical Patterns How Many Securities Should an Active Manager hold? What Makes the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy So Popular Today? A Critical Review of the Benefits and Risks of a Controversial Investment Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1