Mother Lords: Original Maternal Dominion and the Practice of Preservation in Hobbes

IF 1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1017/hyp.2023.9
Meghan Robison
{"title":"Mother Lords: Original Maternal Dominion and the Practice of Preservation in Hobbes","authors":"Meghan Robison","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hobbes's justification for original maternal dominion is often evaluated in connection to the ambiguous status of women in his political thought. Many feminist interpreters explain this ambiguity as a contradiction: following Carole Pateman, they see maternal dominion as one term of the “paradox of parental power.” The first aim of this article is to elaborate a second, alternative approach within some critical responses to Pateman's reading. Rather than as one part of a contradiction, in these interpretations maternal dominion emerges as a self-standing form of authority that is very different from patriarchal domination. By offering a new synthesis of some of these interpretations, I aim to show this second view as more comprehensive and compelling than that offered by Pateman. Then, building upon this view, I give a new reading of the concept of preservation that establishes the mother's dominion as an intersubjective practice that reflects an awareness about the interdependent conditions for human well-being and, hence, challenges the standard approach to Hobbesian individualism and sovereign power. Finally, drawing from my interpretation of preservation, I offer a new way to understand Hobbes's argument that “parental authority is derived from the child's consent.”","PeriodicalId":47921,"journal":{"name":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Hobbes's justification for original maternal dominion is often evaluated in connection to the ambiguous status of women in his political thought. Many feminist interpreters explain this ambiguity as a contradiction: following Carole Pateman, they see maternal dominion as one term of the “paradox of parental power.” The first aim of this article is to elaborate a second, alternative approach within some critical responses to Pateman's reading. Rather than as one part of a contradiction, in these interpretations maternal dominion emerges as a self-standing form of authority that is very different from patriarchal domination. By offering a new synthesis of some of these interpretations, I aim to show this second view as more comprehensive and compelling than that offered by Pateman. Then, building upon this view, I give a new reading of the concept of preservation that establishes the mother's dominion as an intersubjective practice that reflects an awareness about the interdependent conditions for human well-being and, hence, challenges the standard approach to Hobbesian individualism and sovereign power. Finally, drawing from my interpretation of preservation, I offer a new way to understand Hobbes's argument that “parental authority is derived from the child's consent.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲领主:霍布斯的原始母性统治与保护实践
摘要霍布斯对母性原始性统治的论证,常常与妇女在其政治思想中的模糊地位联系起来加以评价。许多女权主义者将这种模糊性解释为一种矛盾:跟随卡罗尔·帕特曼(Carole Pateman),他们将母性统治视为“父母权力悖论”的一个术语。本文的第一个目的是在对帕特曼阅读的一些批判性回应中阐述第二种替代方法。而不是作为矛盾的一部分,在这些解释中,母性统治作为一种独立的权威形式出现,与父权统治非常不同。通过对其中一些解释进行新的综合,我的目的是展示第二种观点,它比帕特曼提供的观点更全面、更有说服力。然后,在此观点的基础上,我对保护概念进行了新的解读,将母亲的统治建立为一种主体间的实践,反映了对人类福祉的相互依存条件的认识,因此,挑战了霍布斯个人主义和主权权力的标准方法。最后,根据我对保存的解释,我提供了一种新的方式来理解霍布斯的论点,即“父母的权威来源于孩子的同意”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
“My Soul Hurt, and I Felt as If I Was Going to Die”: Obstetric Violence as Torture “Obstetric Violence,” “Mistreatment,” and “Disrespect and Abuse”: Reflections on the Politics of Naming Violations During Facility-Based Childbirth Animating the Affect–Care–Labor Link in the Wake of “The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill”: Care Ethics and Policymaking on Indian Surrogacy Thinking through Vulnerability Me, Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism. Alison Phipps. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2020 (ISBN: 978-1526147172)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1