Classical deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY European Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1177/14773708211072415
Juste Abramovaite, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Samrat Bhattacharya, Nick Cowen
{"title":"Classical deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales","authors":"Juste Abramovaite, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Samrat Bhattacharya, Nick Cowen","doi":"10.1177/14773708211072415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The severity, certainty and celerity (swiftness) of punishment are theorised to influence offending through deterrence. Yet celerity is rarely included in empirical studies of criminal activity and the three deterrence factors have never been analysed in one empirical model. We address this gap with an analysis using unique panel data of recorded theft, burglary and violence against the person for 41 Police Force Areas in England and Wales using variables that capture these three theorised factors of deterrence. We find that the three factors affect crime in different ways. Increased detection by the police (certainty) is associated with reduced theft and burglary but not violence. We find that variation in the celerity of sanction has a significant impact on theft offences but not on burglary or violence offences. Increased average prison sentences (severity) reduce burglary only. We account for these results in terms of data challenges and the likely different motivations underlying violent and acquisitive crime.","PeriodicalId":51475,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Criminology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The severity, certainty and celerity (swiftness) of punishment are theorised to influence offending through deterrence. Yet celerity is rarely included in empirical studies of criminal activity and the three deterrence factors have never been analysed in one empirical model. We address this gap with an analysis using unique panel data of recorded theft, burglary and violence against the person for 41 Police Force Areas in England and Wales using variables that capture these three theorised factors of deterrence. We find that the three factors affect crime in different ways. Increased detection by the police (certainty) is associated with reduced theft and burglary but not violence. We find that variation in the celerity of sanction has a significant impact on theft offences but not on burglary or violence offences. Increased average prison sentences (severity) reduce burglary only. We account for these results in terms of data challenges and the likely different motivations underlying violent and acquisitive crime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温经典威慑理论:对英格兰和威尔士警察部队地区的实证分析
惩罚的严重性、确定性和快速性(快速性)被理论化为通过威慑来影响犯罪。然而,犯罪活动的实证研究很少包括快速性,也从未在一个实证模型中分析过这三个威慑因素。我们利用英格兰和威尔士41个警察部队地区记录的盗窃、入室盗窃和暴力侵害人行为的独特面板数据进行分析,利用捕捉这三个理论威慑因素的变量来解决这一差距。我们发现这三个因素以不同的方式影响犯罪。警方侦查的增加(确定性)与盗窃和入室盗窃的减少有关,但与暴力无关。我们发现,制裁速度的变化对盗窃犯罪有显著影响,但对入室盗窃或暴力犯罪没有影响。平均刑期(严重程度)的增加只会减少入室盗窃。我们从数据挑战以及暴力和获取性犯罪背后可能存在的不同动机的角度来解释这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Criminology
European Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Criminology is a refereed journal published by SAGE publications and the European Society of Criminology. It provides a forum for research and scholarship on crime and criminal justice institutions. The journal published high quality articles using varied approaches, including discussion of theory, analysis of quantitative data, comparative studies, systematic evaluation of interventions, and study of institutions of political process. The journal also covers analysis of policy, but not description of policy developments. Priority is given to articles that are relevant to the wider Europe (within and beyond the EU) although findings may be drawn from other parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
A meta-evaluative synthesis of the effects of custodial and community-based offender rehabilitation Punitiveness of society and criminal policy in six Central European countries Non-consensual intimate image distribution: Nature, removal, and implications for the Online Safety Act Self-legitimacy of prison workers: A comparative study in Slovenian prisons Exploring the factors influencing prison incentive scheme status among adult males: A prospective longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1