Technology Advancements for Whistleblowing Reporting Platforms and Employees' Decision to Blow the Whistle

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Accounting and the Public Interest Pub Date : 2020-10-08 DOI:10.2308/api-2020-001
Lei Gao
{"title":"Technology Advancements for Whistleblowing Reporting Platforms and Employees' Decision to Blow the Whistle","authors":"Lei Gao","doi":"10.2308/api-2020-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires public companies to maintain platforms for employees to report questionable practices anonymously. Technological advancements have now enabled many firms to incorporate technology into their whistleblowing platforms. An online platform is often promoted as a medium that offers more anonymity than the traditional phone platform. Furthermore, developments in artificial intelligence have enhanced the creation of virtual agents, which can run 24/7/365 at a low cost. Using an experimental paradigm, this study found no significant difference in perceived anonymity between online reporting and phone reporting. The phone platform attracted more reporting intention when a live agent handled reports because witnesses feel more support when talking to a live agent over the phone. However, the witnesses were more likely to report to an online platform when a virtual agent handled the reports because witnesses believed that it is more efficient and provides greater control while reporting.\n Data Availability: Please contact the author.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2020-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires public companies to maintain platforms for employees to report questionable practices anonymously. Technological advancements have now enabled many firms to incorporate technology into their whistleblowing platforms. An online platform is often promoted as a medium that offers more anonymity than the traditional phone platform. Furthermore, developments in artificial intelligence have enhanced the creation of virtual agents, which can run 24/7/365 at a low cost. Using an experimental paradigm, this study found no significant difference in perceived anonymity between online reporting and phone reporting. The phone platform attracted more reporting intention when a live agent handled reports because witnesses feel more support when talking to a live agent over the phone. However, the witnesses were more likely to report to an online platform when a virtual agent handled the reports because witnesses believed that it is more efficient and provides greater control while reporting. Data Availability: Please contact the author.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
举报平台的技术进步与员工的举报决定
《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)第302条要求上市公司为员工提供匿名举报可疑行为的平台。技术的进步使许多公司能够将技术融入他们的举报平台。在线平台通常被宣传为一种比传统电话平台提供更多匿名性的媒介。此外,人工智能的发展促进了虚拟代理的创建,虚拟代理可以以低成本全天候运行。采用实验范式,本研究发现网络举报与电话举报在感知匿名性上无显著差异。当现场代理处理报告时,电话平台吸引了更多的报告意愿,因为目击者在与现场代理通过电话交谈时感受到更多的支持。然而,当虚拟代理处理报告时,证人更有可能向在线平台报告,因为证人认为这更有效,并且在报告时提供了更大的控制。资料可得性:请联系作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Self-Concept Priming and Message Framing As Strategies for Improving Individuals’ Compliance: A Case Study of Bicultural Taxpayers’ Tip Reporting Editorial Policy The Impact of the Global Pandemic on Ethics, Professionalism, and Judgment in Accounting and Financial Reporting Data Breach Severity and Debt Market Responses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1