Identification and characterization of slimming-targeted diets in Oran population

Nutrition Sante Pub Date : 2019-01-31 DOI:10.30952/NS.7.2.4
Adila A. Chiluvane, S. Louala
{"title":"Identification and characterization of slimming-targeted diets in Oran population","authors":"Adila A. Chiluvane, S. Louala","doi":"10.30952/NS.7.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Overweight and obesity are a public health problem that may require monitoring of a diet as a part of care, by a health professional. However, dieting is often followed, in the absence of overweight or medical indication, for mainly aesthetic reasons and may expose individuals obsessed with thinness to potential health hazards. Objective. Characterize dieting to aim slimming and evaluate the perception and eating habits of weight loss in Oran population. Subjects and methods. Adults (16 men (M) and 51 women (W)), aged between 18 and 65 years, were recruited in different institutions, neighborhoods and sports halls, in Oran city. Data were collected using an anonymous questionnaire on type and perception of practiced dieting, and circumstances of its adoption. Results. 64.7% of W and 62.5% of M reported at least one dieting in their lifetime; 25% of M and W were dieting for at least 3 months; 37.5% of M and 21.6% of W have been dieting for at least 1 year, and 55.5% of subjects followed a low-calorie diet. The most frequently cited dieting was the Cohen method. For the starch reduction or suppression diet, 54.8% of subjects reported having followed it, among them 25% of the M and 13.7% of the W preferred the Low Carb method. 44.7% of the subjects chose the dissociated diet, 12.5% of the M practiced the Montignac method. For the protein-enhanced diet, the most commonly cited method was Dukan (43.8% for M and 21.6% for W). The most common diets were for M: less sugar (25%), less fat (18.8%), lemon-detox and vegetarian (12.5%), and for W, less sugar (43.1%), less fat (39.2%), cabbage soup (35.3%), lemon-detox (31.4%). Conclusion. Dieting practice in studied population is comparable to that found in European populations. A preventing politic for our population must be proposed to better identify the possible harmful consequences of slimming diets, carried out without a referral or follow-up by a specialist.","PeriodicalId":31426,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Sante","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Sante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30952/NS.7.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Overweight and obesity are a public health problem that may require monitoring of a diet as a part of care, by a health professional. However, dieting is often followed, in the absence of overweight or medical indication, for mainly aesthetic reasons and may expose individuals obsessed with thinness to potential health hazards. Objective. Characterize dieting to aim slimming and evaluate the perception and eating habits of weight loss in Oran population. Subjects and methods. Adults (16 men (M) and 51 women (W)), aged between 18 and 65 years, were recruited in different institutions, neighborhoods and sports halls, in Oran city. Data were collected using an anonymous questionnaire on type and perception of practiced dieting, and circumstances of its adoption. Results. 64.7% of W and 62.5% of M reported at least one dieting in their lifetime; 25% of M and W were dieting for at least 3 months; 37.5% of M and 21.6% of W have been dieting for at least 1 year, and 55.5% of subjects followed a low-calorie diet. The most frequently cited dieting was the Cohen method. For the starch reduction or suppression diet, 54.8% of subjects reported having followed it, among them 25% of the M and 13.7% of the W preferred the Low Carb method. 44.7% of the subjects chose the dissociated diet, 12.5% of the M practiced the Montignac method. For the protein-enhanced diet, the most commonly cited method was Dukan (43.8% for M and 21.6% for W). The most common diets were for M: less sugar (25%), less fat (18.8%), lemon-detox and vegetarian (12.5%), and for W, less sugar (43.1%), less fat (39.2%), cabbage soup (35.3%), lemon-detox (31.4%). Conclusion. Dieting practice in studied population is comparable to that found in European populations. A preventing politic for our population must be proposed to better identify the possible harmful consequences of slimming diets, carried out without a referral or follow-up by a specialist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥兰群体减肥目标饮食的鉴定与表征
介绍超重和肥胖是一个公共卫生问题,可能需要健康专业人员对饮食进行监测,作为护理的一部分。然而,在没有超重或医学指征的情况下,通常会进行节食,主要是出于审美原因,这可能会使痴迷于苗条的人面临潜在的健康危害。客观的以减肥为目标的节食为特征,并评估奥兰人群对减肥的看法和饮食习惯。主题和方法。在奥兰市的不同机构、社区和体育馆招募了年龄在18至65岁之间的成年人(16名男性(M)和51名女性(W))。数据是使用一份匿名问卷收集的,内容涉及节食的类型和认知,以及采用节食的情况。后果64.7%的W和62.5%的M一生中至少有一次节食;25%的男性和女性节食至少3个月;37.5%的男性和21.6%的女性已经节食至少一年,55.5%的受试者遵循低热量饮食。最常被提及的节食法是科恩减肥法。对于减少淀粉或抑制淀粉的饮食,54.8%的受试者报告遵循了该方法,其中25%的M和13.7%的W更喜欢低碳水化合物方法。44.7%的受试者选择游离饮食,12.5%的M采用Montignac方法。对于蛋白质强化饮食,最常用的方法是杜坎(M为43.8%,W为21.6%)。最常见的饮食是M:少糖(25%),少脂肪(18.8%),柠檬排毒和素食(12.5%),W:少糖,少脂肪,卷心菜汤(35.3%),柠檬解毒(31.4%)。研究人群的饮食习惯与欧洲人群相当。必须为我们的人口提出一种预防策略,以更好地识别减肥饮食可能带来的有害后果,在没有专家转诊或随访的情况下进行减肥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gluten-free pasta enriched with whey for celiac patients Food Policy in Algeria: Between economic priorities and social constraints Influence of the salt addition on the couscous quality Assessment of iodine concentrations of cooking salt commercialized in some municipalities in eastern Algeria. Study of antimicrobial, antifungal and healing properties of Kefir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1